Background: Fueled by rapid technological advances over the past decade, there is growing interest in the use of smartphones to aid in smoking cessation. Hundreds of applications have been developed for this purpose, but little is known about how these applications are accessed and used by smokers or what features smokers believe would be most useful. Purpose: The present study sought to understand the prevalence of smartphone ownership and patterns of use among smokers as well as the perceived utility of various smartphone application features for smoking cessation that are currently in development or already available. Methods: Daily cigarette smokers (n = 224) reported on smartphone ownership, their patterns of smartphone usage, and perceived utility of features. Features were ranked according to perceived utility and differences in both perceived utility and general smartphone use patterns were examined as a function of demographic and smoking-related variables. Results: Most smokers (80.4%) own a smartphone, but experience with smoking cessation applications is extremely rare (6.1%). Ownership and patterns of usage differed as a function of demographic and smoking-related variables. Overall, gain-framed features were rated as most useful, while loss-framed and interpersonal features were rated as least useful. Conclusions: Mobile health interventions have the potential to reach a large number of smokers but are currently underutilized. Additional effort is needed to ensure parity in treatment access. Gain-framed messages may be especially useful for engaging smokers, even if other features ultimately drive treatment effects. Implications: This study describes patterns of smartphone usage among smokers and identifies the smartphone application features smokers believe would be most useful during a quit attempt. Findings indicate which subgroups of smokers are most likely to be reached with mobile health interventions and suggests that inclusion of specific features may be helpful for engaging smokers in the smoking cessation process.
Background: Fueled by rapid technological advances over the past decade, there is growing interest in the use of smartphones to aid in smoking cessation. Hundreds of applications have been developed for this purpose, but little is known about how these applications are accessed and used by smokers or what features smokers believe would be most useful. Purpose: The present study sought to understand the prevalence of smartphone ownership and patterns of use among smokers as well as the perceived utility of various smartphone application features for smoking cessation that are currently in development or already available. Methods: Daily cigarette smokers (n = 224) reported on smartphone ownership, their patterns of smartphone usage, and perceived utility of features. Features were ranked according to perceived utility and differences in both perceived utility and general smartphone use patterns were examined as a function of demographic and smoking-related variables. Results: Most smokers (80.4%) own a smartphone, but experience with smoking cessation applications is extremely rare (6.1%). Ownership and patterns of usage differed as a function of demographic and smoking-related variables. Overall, gain-framed features were rated as most useful, while loss-framed and interpersonal features were rated as least useful. Conclusions: Mobile health interventions have the potential to reach a large number of smokers but are currently underutilized. Additional effort is needed to ensure parity in treatment access. Gain-framed messages may be especially useful for engaging smokers, even if other features ultimately drive treatment effects. Implications: This study describes patterns of smartphone usage among smokers and identifies the smartphone application features smokers believe would be most useful during a quit attempt. Findings indicate which subgroups of smokers are most likely to be reached with mobile health interventions and suggests that inclusion of specific features may be helpful for engaging smokers in the smoking cessation process.
Authors: David B Buller; Ron Borland; Erwin P Bettinghaus; James H Shane; Donald E Zimmerman Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Bettina B Hoeppner; Susanne S Hoeppner; Lourah Seaboyer; Melissa R Schick; Gwyneth W Y Wu; Brandon G Bergman; John F Kelly Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jonathan B Bricker; Kristin E Mull; Julie A Kientz; Roger Vilardaga; Laina D Mercer; Katrina J Akioka; Jaimee L Heffner Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Benjamin A Toll; Peter Salovey; Stephanie S O'Malley; Carolyn M Mazure; Amy Latimer; Sherry A McKee Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Harveen Kaur Ubhi; Daniel Kotz; Susan Michie; Onno C P van Schayck; David Sheard; Abiram Selladurai; Robert West Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Sharon Lawn; Joseph Van Agteren; Sara Zabeen; Sue Bertossa; Christopher Barton; James Stewart Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Minda A Gowarty; Meghan R Longacre; Roger Vilardaga; Nathan J Kung; Ashley E Gaughan-Maher; Mary F Brunette Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2021-07-07
Authors: Chaelin K Ra; Emily T Hébert; Adam C Alexander; Angela Helt; Rachel Moisiuc; Darla E Kendzor; Damon J Vidrine; Rachel K Funk-Lawler; Michael S Businelle Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 5.428