Literature DB >> 29064899

Variation in Drain Management After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Early Versus Delayed Removal.

Joal D Beane1, Michael G House1, Eugene P Ceppa1, Scott C Dolejs1, Henry A Pitt2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objectives are to report practice patterns and management of operatively placed drains and to compare outcomes in patients with early versus delayed drain removal after pancreatoduodenectomy.
BACKGROUND: Early drain removal after pancreatoduodenectomy, when guided by postoperative day (POD) 1 drain fluid amylase (DFA-1), is associated with reduced rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). However, whether surgeons have altered their management based on this strategy is unknown.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2014 Participant Use File was queried to identify patients having undergone pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 3093). Patients with intraoperatively placed drains were stratified according to measurement of DFA-1 and day of drain removal. Patients with POD 1 DFA-1 of ≤5000 U/L whose drains were removed by POD 3 were propensity score-matched with patients whose drains were removed after POD 3.
RESULTS: Of 2698 patients, 580 (21.5%) had a DFA-1 recorded. Measurement of DFA-1 was associated with earlier time to drain removal and shorter postoperative length of stay (P < 0.01). Propensity score matching revealed that early drain removal when DFA-1 was ≤5000 U/L was associated with significant (P < 0.05) reductions in overall morbidity (35.3% vs 52.3%), CR-POPF (0.9% vs 7.9%), and length of stay (6 vs 8 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation exists in the use of drain fluid amylase in the management and timing of surgical drain removal after pancreatoduodenectomy. Clinical outcomes are best when drain fluid amylase is low and operatively placed drains are removed by POD 3.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 29064899     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

1.  Evolving the Paradigm of Early Drain Removal Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Seykora; Laura Maggino; Giuseppe Malleo; Major K Lee; Robert Roses; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Evidence Versus Practice in Early Drain Removal After Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Nicole Villafane-Ferriol; Katherine A Baugh; Amy L McElhany; George Van Buren; Andrew Fang; Erisha K Tashakori; Jose E Mendez Reyes; Hop S Tran Cao; Eric J Silberfein; Nader Massarweh; Cary Hsu; Omar Barakat; Carl Schmidt; Nicholas J Zyromski; Mary Dillhoff; Joshua A Villarreal; William E Fisher
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Development and validation of risk prediction nomogram for pancreatic fistula and risk-stratified strategy for drainage management after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jie Yin; Qicong Zhu; Kai Zhang; Wentao Gao; Junli Wu; Zipeng Lu; Kuirong Jiang; Yi Miao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

4.  Prophylactic octreotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with pancreatoduodenectomy: Risk-stratified analysis.

Authors:  So Jeong Yoon; Okjoo Lee; Ji Hye Jung; Sang Hyun Shin; Jin Seok Heo; In Woong Han
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xuehai Xie; Kai Chen; Zonghao Liu; Feng Wang; Yongsu Ma; Shupeng Zhang; Zhijiang Shao; Yinmo Yang; Xiaodong Tian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.