Catherine R Glenn1, Evan M Kleiman2, Christine B Cha3, Charlene A Deming2, Joseph C Franklin4, Matthew K Nock2. 1. Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, Columbia University Teachers College, New York City, NY, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The field is in need of novel and transdiagnostic risk factors for suicide. The National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) provides a framework that may help advance research on suicidal behavior. METHOD: We conducted a meta-analytic review of existing prospective risk and protective factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (ideation, attempts, and deaths) that fall within one of the five RDoC domains or relate to a prominent suicide theory. Predictors were selected from a database of 4,082 prospective risk and protective factors for suicide outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 460 predictors met inclusion criteria for this meta-analytic review and most examined risk (vs. protective) factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The overall effect of risk factors was statistically significant, but relatively small, in predicting suicide ideation (weighted mean odds ratio: wOR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.59-1.87), suicide attempt (wOR = 1.66 [1.57-1.76), and suicide death (wOR = 1.41 [1.24-1.60]). Across all suicide outcomes, most risk factors related to the Negative Valence Systems domain, although effect sizes were of similar magnitude across RDoC domains. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the RDoC framework provides a novel and promising approach to suicide research; however, relatively few studies of suicidal behavior fit within this framework. Future studies must go beyond the "usual suspects" of suicide risk factors (e.g., mental disorders, sociodemographics) to understand the processes that combine to lead to this deadly outcome.
BACKGROUND: The field is in need of novel and transdiagnostic risk factors for suicide. The National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) provides a framework that may help advance research on suicidal behavior. METHOD: We conducted a meta-analytic review of existing prospective risk and protective factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (ideation, attempts, and deaths) that fall within one of the five RDoC domains or relate to a prominent suicide theory. Predictors were selected from a database of 4,082 prospective risk and protective factors for suicide outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 460 predictors met inclusion criteria for this meta-analytic review and most examined risk (vs. protective) factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The overall effect of risk factors was statistically significant, but relatively small, in predicting suicide ideation (weighted mean odds ratio: wOR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.59-1.87), suicide attempt (wOR = 1.66 [1.57-1.76), and suicide death (wOR = 1.41 [1.24-1.60]). Across all suicide outcomes, most risk factors related to the Negative Valence Systems domain, although effect sizes were of similar magnitude across RDoC domains. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the RDoC framework provides a novel and promising approach to suicide research; however, relatively few studies of suicidal behavior fit within this framework. Future studies must go beyond the "usual suspects" of suicide risk factors (e.g., mental disorders, sociodemographics) to understand the processes that combine to lead to this deadly outcome.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Christopher H Warner; Christopher Ivany; Maria V Petukhova; Sherri Rose; Evelyn J Bromet; Millard Brown; Tianxi Cai; Lisa J Colpe; Kenneth L Cox; Carol S Fullerton; Stephen E Gilman; Michael J Gruber; Steven G Heeringa; Lisa Lewandowski-Romps; Junlong Li; Amy M Millikan-Bell; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Anthony J Rosellini; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein; Simon Wessely; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert J Ursano Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Yuval Barak-Corren; Victor M Castro; Solomon Javitt; Alison G Hoffnagle; Yael Dai; Roy H Perlis; Matthew K Nock; Jordan W Smoller; Ben Y Reis Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Kate H Bentley; Joseph C Franklin; Jessica D Ribeiro; Evan M Kleiman; Kathryn R Fox; Matthew K Nock Journal: Clin Psychol Rev Date: 2015-12-02
Authors: Matthew K Nock; Irving Hwang; Nancy Sampson; Ronald C Kessler; Matthias Angermeyer; Annette Beautrais; Guilherme Borges; Evelyn Bromet; Ronny Bruffaerts; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Chiyi Hu; Yueqin Huang; Elie G Karam; Norito Kawakami; Viviane Kovess; Daphna Levinson; Jose Posada-Villa; Rajesh Sagar; Toma Tomov; Maria Carmen Viana; David R Williams Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Gil Zalsman; Keith Hawton; Danuta Wasserman; Kees van Heeringen; Ella Arensman; Marco Sarchiapone; Vladimir Carli; Cyril Höschl; Ran Barzilay; Judit Balazs; György Purebl; Jean Pierre Kahn; Pilar Alejandra Sáiz; Cendrine Bursztein Lipsicas; Julio Bobes; Doina Cozman; Ulrich Hegerl; Joseph Zohar Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: B P Chang; J C Franklin; J D Ribeiro; K R Fox; K H Bentley; E M Kleiman; M K Nock Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Christine B Cha; Peter J Franz; Eleonora M Guzmán; Catherine R Glenn; Evan M Kleiman; Matthew K Nock Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Krista Brucker; Carter Duggan; Joseph Niezer; Kyle Roseberry; Helen Le-Niculescu; Alexander B Niculescu; Jeffrey A Kline Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 3.451