| Literature DB >> 29064449 |
Francoise Neil D Dacanay1, Ma Carmina Joyce A Ladra2, Hiyas A Junio3, Ricky B Nellas4.
Abstract
Essential oils extracted from plants are composed of volatile organic compounds that can affect insect behavior. Identifying the active components of the essential oils to their biochemical target is necessary to design novel biopesticides. In this study, essential oils extracted from Diospyros discolor (Willd.) were analyzed using gas chromatography mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) to create an untargeted metabolite profile. Subsequently, a conformational ensemble of the Drosophila melanogaster octopamine receptor in mushroom bodies (OAMB) was created from a molecular dynamics simulation to resemble a flexible receptor for docking studies. GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of several metabolites, i.e. mostly aromatic esters. Interestingly, these aromatic esters were found to exhibit relatively higher binding affinities to OAMB than the receptor's natural agonist, octopamine. The molecular origin of this observed enhanced affinity is the π -stacking interaction between the aromatic moieties of the residues and ligands. This strategy, computational inspection in tandem with untargeted metabolomics, may provide insights in screening the essential oils as potential OAMB inhibitors.Entities:
Keywords: Diospyros discolor (Willd.); Drosophila melanogaster; ensemble docking; flexible receptor-ligand docking; untargeted metabolomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29064449 PMCID: PMC6151447 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22101677
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chromatogram of essential oils extracted from mabolo fruit using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. The peaks are labeled according to each compound identified. (1) Methyl butanoate, (2) Ethyl butanoate, (3) Butyl butanoate, (4) Methyl benzoate, (5) Butyl benzoate, (6) Benzyl butanoate, (7) Benzyl alcohol.
Isolated essential oil components by gas chromatography with their retention time (in min) and their percent abundance in the extracted oils.
| Compounds Identified | Retention Time (min) | Relative Abundance |
|---|---|---|
| Methyl benzoate | 8.2 | 53.4 |
| Benzyl butanoate | 11.5 | 15.2 |
| Benzyl alcohol | 11.6 | 9.8 |
| Ethyl butanoate | 3.4 | 8.5 |
| Butyl butanoate | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| Methyl butanoate | 3.0 | 5.6 |
| Butyl benzoate | 11.4 | 1.4 |
Figure 2Transmembrane helix sequence alignment of Drosophila melanogaster OAMB and the top templates used in the homology modeling. Helix numbers are specified by the overbars.
Average binding energies of the OAMB-ligand complexes formed and their calculated inhibition constants computed using the Gibbs free energy relation . The mean binding affinities of the ligands, at 95% confidence level, to OAMB were obtained from the ensemble docking procedure. Statistical data presented is computed at 95% confidence interval. where n = 100.
| Ligand | Average Binding Affinity (kcal·mol | Average |
|---|---|---|
| Octopamine | −5.18 ± 0.07 | 191.9 ± 27.4 |
| Benzyl butanoate | −6.03 ± 0.09 | 54.0 ± 12.3 |
| Butyl benzoate | −6.02 ± 0.01 | 47.6 ± 7.2 |
| Methyl benzoate | −5.61 ± 0.07 | 94.2 ± 15.0 |
| Benzyl alcohol | −4.93 ± 0.06 | 280.3 ± 37.9 |
| Butyl butanoate | −4.88 ± 0.06 | 304.1 ± 32.4 |
| Ethyl butanoate | −4.41 ± 0.06 | 657.8 ± 65.2 |
| Methyl butanoate | −4.06 ± 0.05 | 1140.7 ± 93.6 |
Figure 3Different binding sites were observed from the ensemble docking since the ensemble is a collection of different conformations of the protein. Here, probability (p) of the ligands to interact with several residues is shown.