Elizabeth R Rayburn1, Liang Gao2, Jiayi Ding3, Hongxia Ding4, Jun Shao3, Haibo Li5,6. 1. CLIA Laboratory Director, Birmingham, AL, 35242, USA. 2. Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Nantong Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Nantong, 226018, China. 3. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Nantong Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Nantong, 226018, China. 4. Pharmacodia (Beijing) Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100085, China. 5. Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Nantong Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Nantong, 226018, China. ntlihaibo2015@163.com. 6. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Nantong Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Nantong, 226018, China. ntlihaibo2015@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study reviews FDA-approved drugs that negatively impact spermatozoa in animals, as well as how these findings reflect on observations in human male gametes. METHODS: The FDA drug warning labels included in the DailyMed database and the peer-reviewed literature in the PubMed database were searched for information to identify single-ingredient, FDA-approved prescription drugs with spermatotoxic effects. RESULTS: A total of 235 unique, single-ingredient, FDA-approved drugs reported to be spermatotoxic in animals were identified in the drug labels. Forty-nine of these had documented negative effects on humans in either the drug label or literature, while 31 had no effect or a positive impact on human sperm. For the other 155 drugs that were spermatotoxic in animals, no human data was available. CONCLUSION: The current animal models are not very effective for predicting human spermatotoxicity, and there is limited information available about the impact of many drugs on human spermatozoa. New approaches should be designed that more accurately reflect the findings in men, including more studies on human sperm in vitro and studies using other systems (ex vivo tissue culture, xenograft models, in silico studies, etc.). In addition, the present data is often incomplete or reported in a manner that prevents interpretation of their clinical relevance. Changes should be made to the requirements for pre-clinical testing, drug surveillance, and the warning labels of drugs to ensure that the potential risks to human fertility are clearly indicated.
PURPOSE: This study reviews FDA-approved drugs that negatively impact spermatozoa in animals, as well as how these findings reflect on observations in human male gametes. METHODS: The FDA drug warning labels included in the DailyMed database and the peer-reviewed literature in the PubMed database were searched for information to identify single-ingredient, FDA-approved prescription drugs with spermatotoxic effects. RESULTS: A total of 235 unique, single-ingredient, FDA-approved drugs reported to be spermatotoxic in animals were identified in the drug labels. Forty-nine of these had documented negative effects on humans in either the drug label or literature, while 31 had no effect or a positive impact on human sperm. For the other 155 drugs that were spermatotoxic in animals, no human data was available. CONCLUSION: The current animal models are not very effective for predicting human spermatotoxicity, and there is limited information available about the impact of many drugs on human spermatozoa. New approaches should be designed that more accurately reflect the findings in men, including more studies on human sperm in vitro and studies using other systems (ex vivo tissue culture, xenograft models, in silico studies, etc.). In addition, the present data is often incomplete or reported in a manner that prevents interpretation of their clinical relevance. Changes should be made to the requirements for pre-clinical testing, drug surveillance, and the warning labels of drugs to ensure that the potential risks to human fertility are clearly indicated.
Entities:
Keywords:
Drug warning labels; Infertility; Reproductive toxicology; Spermatotoxicity
Authors: J K Amory; C H Muller; S T Page; E Leifke; E R Pagel; A Bhandari; B Subramanyam; W Bone; A Radlmaier; W J Bremner Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2006-10-25 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: J M Douglas; L G Davis; M L Remington; C A Paulsen; E B Perrin; P Goodman; J D Conner; D King; L Corey Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1988-03 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Omar José; Oscar Hernández-Hernández; Mayel Chirinos; María Elena González-González; Fernando Larrea; Angélica Almanza; Ricardo Felix; Alberto Darszon; Claudia L Treviño Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 3.575