Literature DB >> 29063609

Integrated genome analysis of uterine leiomyosarcoma to identify novel driver genes and targetable pathways.

Tine Cuppens1,2, Matthieu Moisse3, Jeroen Depreeuw1,2,3, Daniela Annibali1, Eva Colas4, Antonio Gil-Moreno4,5, Jutta Huvila6, Olli Carpén6,7, Michal Zikán8, Xavier Matias-Guiu9, Philippe Moerman10, Sabrina Croce11, Diether Lambrechts2,3, Frédéric Amant1,12.   

Abstract

Uterine leiomyosarcomas (uLMS) are rare, aggressive malignancies for which limited treatment options are available. To gain novel molecular insights into uLMS and identify potential novel therapeutic targets, we characterized 84 uLMS samples for genome-wide somatic copy number alterations, mutations, gene fusions and gene expression and performed a data integration analysis. We found that alterations affecting TP53, RB1, PTEN, MED12, YWHAE and VIPR2 were present in the majority of uLMS. Pathway analyses additionally revealed that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR, estrogen-mediated S-phase entry and DNA damage response signaling pathways, for which inhibitors have already been developed and approved, frequently harbored genetic changes. Furthermore, a significant proportion of uLMS was characterized by amplifications and overexpression of known oncogenes (CCNE1, TDO2), as well as deletions and reduced expression of tumor suppressor genes (PTEN, PRDM16). Overall, it emerged that the most frequently affected gene in our uLMS samples was VIPR2 (96%). Interestingly, VIPR2 deletion also correlated with unfavorable survival in uLMS patients (multivariate analysis; HR = 4.5, CI = 1.4-14.3, p = 1.2E-02), while VIPR2 protein expression was reduced in uLMS vs. normal myometrium. Moreover, stimulation of VIPR2 with its natural agonist VIP decreased SK-UT-1 uLMS cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. These data suggest that VIPR2, which is a negative regulator of smooth muscle cell proliferation, might be a novel tumor suppressor gene in uLMS. Our work further highlights the importance of integrative molecular analyses, through which we were able to uncover the genes and pathways most frequently affected by somatic alterations in uLMS.
© 2017 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA sequencing; copy number alteration; data integration; molecular profiling; uterine leiomyosarcoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29063609     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  22 in total

1.  Identification of key genes and pathways in uterine leiomyosarcoma through bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Yuqin Zang; Lina Gu; Yanfang Zhang; Yingmei Wang; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Systemic Treatment of Metastatic/Recurrent Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Changing Paradigm.

Authors:  Rebecca C Arend; Michael D Toboni; Allison M Montgomery; Robert A Burger; Alexander B Olawaiye; Bradley J Monk; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-23

3.  Clinical Outcome of Leiomyosarcomas With Somatic Alteration in Homologous Recombination Pathway Genes.

Authors:  Evan Rosenbaum; Philip Jonsson; Kenneth Seier; Li-Xuan Qin; Ping Chi; Mark Dickson; Mrinal Gounder; Ciara Kelly; Mary L Keohan; Benjamin Nacev; Mark T A Donoghue; Sarah Chiang; Samuel Singer; Marc Ladanyi; Cristina R Antonescu; Martee L Hensley; Sujana Movva; Sandra P D'Angelo; William D Tap
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-11-06

4.  Oncogenic Gene-Expression Programs in Leiomyosarcoma and Characterization of Conventional, Inflammatory, and Uterogenic Subtypes.

Authors:  Matthew L Hemming; Changyu Fan; Chandrajit P Raut; George D Demetri; Scott A Armstrong; Ewa Sicinska; Suzanne George
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 5.  Reasons to Reconsider Risk Associated With Power Morcellation of Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Burkhard Helmke; Joern Bullerdiek; Carsten Holzmann; Wolfgang Kuepker; Birgit Rommel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 6.  Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: What Can We Learn from Other Cancer Types?

Authors:  Wout De Wispelaere; Daniela Annibali; Sandra Tuyaerts; Diether Lambrechts; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Leiomyosarcoma With Progressive Disease.

Authors:  Matthew L Hemming; Kelly S Klega; Justin Rhoades; Gavin Ha; Kate E Acker; Jessica L Andersen; Edwin Thai; Anwesha Nag; Aaron R Thorner; Chandrajit P Raut; Suzanne George; Brian D Crompton
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-01-24

8.  Genomic Profiling Aids Classification of Diagnostically Challenging Uterine Mesenchymal Tumors With Myomelanocytic Differentiation.

Authors:  Pier Selenica; Niamh Conlon; Carlene Gonzalez; Denise Frosina; Achim A Jungbluth; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Mamta K Rao; Yanming Zhang; Ryma Benayed; Marc Ladanyi; David B Solit; Sarah Chiang; David M Hyman; Martee L Hensley; Robert A Soslow; Britta Weigelt; Rajmohan Murali
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 9.  Genomic alterations in gynecological malignancies: histotype-associated driver mutations, molecular subtyping schemes, and tumorigenic mechanisms.

Authors:  Seiichi Mori; Osamu Gotoh; Kazuma Kiyotani; Siew Kee Low
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Characterizing the Invasive Tumor Front of Aggressive Uterine Adenocarcinoma and Leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Sabina Sanegre; Núria Eritja; Carlos de Andrea; Juan Diaz-Martin; Ángel Diaz-Lagares; María Amalia Jácome; Carmen Salguero-Aranda; David García Ros; Ben Davidson; Rafel Lopez; Ignacio Melero; Samuel Navarro; Santiago Ramon Y Cajal; Enrique de Alava; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Rosa Noguera
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.