Literature DB >> 32518213

Oncogenic Gene-Expression Programs in Leiomyosarcoma and Characterization of Conventional, Inflammatory, and Uterogenic Subtypes.

Matthew L Hemming1,2, Changyu Fan3, Chandrajit P Raut4, George D Demetri5,6, Scott A Armstrong7, Ewa Sicinska8, Suzanne George5.   

Abstract

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a mesenchymal neoplasm with complex copy-number alterations and characteristic loss of tumor suppressor genes without known recurrent activating mutations. Clinical management of advanced LMS relies on chemotherapy and complementary palliative approaches, and research efforts to date have had limited success identifying clinically actionable biomarkers or targeted therapeutic vulnerabilities. To explore the biological underpinning of LMS, we evaluated gene-expression patterns of this disease in comparison with diverse sarcomas, nonmesenchymal neoplasms, and normal myogenic tissues. We identified a recurrent gene-expression program in LMS, with evidence of oncogenic evolution of an underlying smooth-muscle lineage-derived program characterized by activation of E2F1 and downstream effectors. Recurrently amplified or highly expressed genes in LMS were identified, including IGF1R and genes involved in retinoid signaling pathways. Though the majority of expressed transcripts were conserved across LMS samples, three separate subtypes were identified that were enriched for muscle-associated transcripts (conventional LMS), immune markers (inflammatory LMS), or a uterine-like gene-expression program (uterogenic LMS). Each of these subtypes expresses a unique subset of genes that may be useful in the management of LMS: IGF1R was enriched in conventional LMS, worse disease-specific survival was observed in inflammatory LMS, and prolactin was elaborated by uterogenic LMS. These results extend our understanding of LMS biology and identify several strategies and challenges for further translational investigation. IMPLICATIONS: LMS has a recurrent oncogenic transcriptional program and consists of molecular subtypes with biological and possible clinical implications. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32518213      PMCID: PMC7484251          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  58 in total

Review 1.  Transcriptional and nontranscriptional functions of E2F1 in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Anup K Biswas; David G Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Polyclonal RB1 mutations and acquired resistance to CDK 4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  R Condorelli; L Spring; J O'Shaughnessy; L Lacroix; C Bailleux; V Scott; J Dubois; R J Nagy; R B Lanman; A J Iafrate; F Andre; A Bardia
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Risk of new cancers after radiotherapy in long-term survivors of retinoblastoma: an extended follow-up.

Authors:  Ruth A Kleinerman; Margaret A Tucker; Robert E Tarone; David H Abramson; Johanna M Seddon; Marilyn Stovall; Frederick P Li; Joseph F Fraumeni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The E2F family and the role of E2F1 in apoptosis.

Authors:  Zhenlong Wu; Shunsheng Zheng; Qiang Yu
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.085

6.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumor enhancers support a transcription factor network predictive of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Matthew L Hemming; Matthew A Lawlor; Rhamy Zeid; Tom Lesluyes; Jonathan A Fletcher; Chandrajit P Raut; Ewa T Sicinska; Frédéric Chibon; Scott A Armstrong; George D Demetri; James E Bradner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  TRIM16 acts as a tumour suppressor by inhibitory effects on cytoplasmic vimentin and nuclear E2F1 in neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  G M Marshall; J L Bell; J Koach; O Tan; P Kim; A Malyukova; W Thomas; E O Sekyere; T Liu; A M Cunningham; V Tobias; M D Norris; M Haber; M Kavallaris; B B Cheung
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  Transcription factors in heart: promising therapeutic targets in cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors:  Shrey Kohli; Suchit Ahuja; Vibha Rani
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2011-11

9.  Prolactin receptor antagonism reduces the clonogenic capacity of breast cancer cells and potentiates doxorubicin and paclitaxel cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Sacha J Howell; Elizabeth Anderson; Tom Hunter; Gillian Farnie; Robert B Clarke
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  The microtubule-associated protein PRC1 promotes early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in association with the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway.

Authors:  Jianxiang Chen; Muthukumar Rajasekaran; Hongping Xia; Xiaoqian Zhang; Shik Nie Kong; Karthik Sekar; Veerabrahma Pratap Seshachalam; Amudha Deivasigamani; Brian Kim Poh Goh; London Lucien Ooi; Wanjin Hong; Kam M Hui
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  5 in total

1.  Computational Discovery of Cancer Immunotherapy Targets by Intercellular CRISPR Screens.

Authors:  Soorin Yim; Woochang Hwang; Namshik Han; Doheon Lee
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Gamma Secretase Inhibitors as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Notch Signaling in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Yasmin Abedin; Sofia Gabrilovich; Emily Alpert; Erica Rego; Salma Begum; Qingshi Zhao; Debra Heller; Mark H Einstein; Nataki C Douglas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Leiomyosarcoma: Does Location of Primary Help to Determine the Best Systemic Therapy Options?

Authors:  Jan Philipp Novotny; Suzanne George
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-09-15

4.  Preclinical Modeling of Leiomyosarcoma Identifies Susceptibility to Transcriptional CDK Inhibitors through Antagonism of E2F-Driven Oncogenic Gene Expression.

Authors:  Matthew L Hemming; Patrick Bhola; Michael A Loycano; Justin A Anderson; Madeleine L Taddei; Leona A Doyle; Elizaveta Lavrova; Jessica L Andersen; Kelly S Klega; Morgan R Benson; Brian D Crompton; Chandrajit P Raut; Suzanne George; Anthony Letai; George D Demetri; Ewa Sicinska
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 13.801

5.  Epigenetic signatures differentiate uterine and soft tissue leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Nesrin M Hasan; Anup Sharma; Nensi M Ruzgar; Hari Deshpande; Kelly Olino; Sajid Khan; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2021-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.