Objectives: Precision medicine requires the measurement, quantification, and cataloging of medical characteristics to identify the most effective medical intervention. However, the amount of available data exceeds our current capacity to extract meaningful information. We examine the informatics needs to achieve precision medicine from the perspective of quantitative imaging and oncology. Methods: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) organized several workshops on the topic of medical imaging and precision medicine. The observations and recommendations are summarized herein. Results: Recommendations include: use of standards in data collection and clinical correlates to promote interoperability; data sharing and validation of imaging tools; clinician's feedback in all phases of research and development; use of open-source architecture to encourage reproducibility and reusability; use of challenges which simulate real-world situations to incentivize innovation; partnership with industry to facilitate commercialization; and education in academic communities regarding the challenges involved with translation of technology from the research domain to clinical utility and the benefits of doing so. Conclusions: This article provides a survey of the role and priorities for imaging informatics to help advance quantitative imaging in the era of precision medicine. While these recommendations were drawn from oncology, they are relevant and applicable to other clinical domains where imaging aids precision medicine. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.
Objectives: Precision medicine requires the measurement, quantification, and cataloging of medical characteristics to identify the most effective medical intervention. However, the amount of available data exceeds our current capacity to extract meaningful information. We examine the informatics needs to achieve precision medicine from the perspective of quantitative imaging and oncology. Methods: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) organized several workshops on the topic of medical imaging and precision medicine. The observations and recommendations are summarized herein. Results: Recommendations include: use of standards in data collection and clinical correlates to promote interoperability; data sharing and validation of imaging tools; clinician's feedback in all phases of research and development; use of open-source architecture to encourage reproducibility and reusability; use of challenges which simulate real-world situations to incentivize innovation; partnership with industry to facilitate commercialization; and education in academic communities regarding the challenges involved with translation of technology from the research domain to clinical utility and the benefits of doing so. Conclusions: This article provides a survey of the role and priorities for imaging informatics to help advance quantitative imaging in the era of precision medicine. While these recommendations were drawn from oncology, they are relevant and applicable to other clinical domains where imaging aids precision medicine. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.
Authors: Christian J Herold; Jonathan S Lewin; Andreas G Wibmer; James H Thrall; Gabriel P Krestin; Adrian K Dixon; Stefan O Schoenberg; Rena J Geckle; Ada Muellner; Hedvig Hricak Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Elizabeth J Sutton; Jung Hun Oh; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya P Apte; Sunitha B Thakur; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: James C Ross; Raúl San José Estépar; Alejandro Díaz; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Ron Kikinis; Edwin K Silverman; George R Washko Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2009
Authors: Liangjia Zhu; Yi Gao; Vikram Appia; Anthony Yezzi; Chesnal Arepalli; Tracy Faber; Arthur Stillman; Allen Tannenbaum Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper; Scott N Hwang; Chad A Holder; Jingjing Gao; Tarun D Aurora; William D Dunn; Lisa Scarpace; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Manal Jilwan; Prashant Raghavan; Erich Huang; Robert J Clifford; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Pascal O Zinn; Carlos S Moreno; Carl Jaffe; Rivka Colen; Daniel L Rubin; Joel Saltz; Adam Flanders; Daniel J Brat Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Xin Qi; Daihou Wang; Ivan Rodero; Javier Diaz-Montes; Rebekah H Gensure; Fuyong Xing; Hua Zhong; Lauri Goodell; Manish Parashar; David J Foran; Lin Yang Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2014-08-26 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Chao Wang; Thierry Pécot; Debra L Zynger; Raghu Machiraju; Charles L Shapiro; Kun Huang Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Frank Rojas; Sharia Hernandez; Rossana Lazcano; Caddie Laberiano-Fernandez; Edwin Roger Parra Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Andriy Fedorov; Michael Schwier; David Clunie; Christian Herz; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis; Clare Tempany; Fiona Fennessy Journal: Sci Data Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: David J Foran; Eric B Durbin; Wenjin Chen; Evita Sadimin; Ashish Sharma; Imon Banerjee; Tahsin Kurc; Nan Li; Antoinette M Stroup; Gerald Harris; Annie Gu; Maria Schymura; Rajarsi Gupta; Erich Bremer; Joseph Balsamo; Tammy DiPrima; Feiqiao Wang; Shahira Abousamra; Dimitris Samaras; Isaac Hands; Kevin Ward; Joel H Saltz Journal: J Pathol Inform Date: 2022-01-05