Literature DB >> 29063301

Significance of a frozen section analysis of the ureteral margin in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Kyohei Hakozaki1, Eiji Kikuchi2, Keishiro Fukumoto1, Suguru Shirotake3, Yasumasa Miyazaki4, Takahiro Maeda5, Gou Kaneko6, Shunsuke Yoshimine7, Nobuyuki Tanaka7, Kunimitsu Kanai8, Masafumi Oyama3, Yosuke Nakajima4, Tetsuo Momma8, Mototsugu Oya1.   

Abstract

Although the clinical utility of a frozen section analysis (FSA) at the time of radical cystectomy (RC) has already been established, its significance and utility in bladder cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have not yet been fully evaluated. We identified 458 patients (937 ureters) who underwent open RC for bladder cancer at our 7 Japanese institutions between 2004 and 2015. Among these patients, 139 (284 ureters) received NAC before RC (NAC group), while 319 (653 ureters) underwent RC alone (non-NAC group). FSA was performed on 356 out of 937 (38.0%) ureters and 179 out of 458 (39.1%) patients. FSA was positive in 30 out of 356 (8.4%) ureters and its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 89.3, 98.5, and 97.8%, respectively. In the NAC group, FSA was performed on 138 out of 284 (48.6%) ureters and 68 out of 139 (48.9%) patients. FSA was positive in 8 out of 138 ureters (5.8%), and its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 77.8, 99.2, and 97.8%, respectively. In the non-NAC group, FSA was performed on 218 out of 653 (33.4%) ureters and 111 out of 319 (34.8%) patients. FSA was positive in 22 out of 218 (10.1%) ureters, and its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 94.7, 98.0, and 97.7%, respectively. No correlation was observed between preoperative clinical factors and FSA positivity in the NAC group; however, in the non-NAC group, the incidence of FSA positivity in the ureters of patients with concomitant CIS in TUR-BT specimens was 8/41 (19.5%), which was significantly higher than that in their counterpart (14/177, 7.9%, p = 0.033). Even in the era of NAC in the management of bladder cancer patients, the performance of FSA does not change and FSA at the time of RC may provide useful diagnostic information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Frozen section analysis; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Radical cystectomy; Ureters

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29063301     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-1048-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  18 in total

1.  Utility and significance of ureteric frozen section analysis during radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Raj Satkunasivam; Brian Hu; Charles Metcalfe; Saum B Ghodoussipour; Manju Aron; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Inderbir Gill; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Clinical significance of ureteric 'skip lesions' at the time of radical cystectomy: the M.D. Anderson experience and literature review.

Authors:  Anthony N Hoang; Piyush K Agarwal; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Christopher G Wood; Adam R Metwalli; Wassim Kassouf; Gordon A Brown; Peter C Black; Diana L Urbauer; H Barton Grossman; Colin P N Dinney; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Significance of intraoperative ureteral evaluation at radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Ganesh V Raj; Raanan Tal; Andrew Vickers; Bernard H Bochner; Angel Serio; S Machele Donat; Harry Herr; Semra Olgac; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Sequential resection of malignant ureteral margins at radical cystectomy: a critical assessment of the value of frozen section analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Gakis; David Schilling; Sven Perner; Christian Schwentner; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Use of radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  John L Gore; Mark S Litwin; Julie Lai; Elizabeth M Yano; Rodger Madison; Claude Setodji; John L Adams; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; V O Speights; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ralph W deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; David P Wood; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The clinical significance of intra-operative ureteral frozen section analysis at radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Hyung Suk Kim; Kyung Chul Moon; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Correlation of pathologic complete response with survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer treated with cystectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Andrea Coinu; Mary Cabiddu; Mara Ghilardi; Ivano Vavassori; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Randomised phase III study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, doxorubicin, vinblastine and cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy compared with radical cystectomy alone for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0209.

Authors:  H Kitamura; T Tsukamoto; T Shibata; N Masumori; H Fujimoto; Y Hirao; K Fujimoto; Y Kitamura; Y Tomita; K Tobisu; M Niwakawa; S Naito; M Eto; Y Kakehi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes; Eva Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Georgios Gakis; Thierry Lebret; Maria J Ribal; Antoine G Van der Heijden; Amir Sherif
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.