OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of routine frozen section analysis of ureters at the time of radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial cancer (UC), and the long-term outcomes of adverse ureteric pathology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pathological data on 2 047 patients undergoing RC for UC with routine frozen section analysis of ureters (January 1971 to December 2009) were analysed. Univariate and multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the risk of upper tract UC (UTUC) recurrence, local recurrence and overall survival in those identified as having adverse pathology (severe atypia/carcinoma in situ [CIS] or UC) at time of frozen section analysis. RESULTS: Adverse pathology was identified by frozen section analysis in 178 patients (8.6%). Frozen section analysis was found to have poor sensitivity in identifying adverse pathology (59.1%), which was improved in patients with preoperative CIS (68.0%). After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 12.4 (1.9-10.1) years, 28 patients (1.4%) developed UTUC recurrence. There were no uretero-enteric anastomotic recurrences. Adverse pathology on frozen section analysis was associated with UTUC recurrence on univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 6.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-13.5), but 15/28 patients (54%) with UTUC recurrence had benign ureteric frozen section analysis on initial sectioning. Adverse pathology on frozen section analysis was not independently associated with the risk of local recurrence (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.61-1.89) or overall survival (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.94-1.35) in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteric frozen section analysis has poor sensitivity and may be marginally improved in pre-existing CIS. UTUC recurrence is rare and can occur despite negative frozen section analysis. Our data question the utility of routine frozen section analysis of the distal ureteric margin at the time of RC.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of routine frozen section analysis of ureters at the time of radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial cancer (UC), and the long-term outcomes of adverse ureteric pathology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pathological data on 2 047 patients undergoing RC for UC with routine frozen section analysis of ureters (January 1971 to December 2009) were analysed. Univariate and multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the risk of upper tract UC (UTUC) recurrence, local recurrence and overall survival in those identified as having adverse pathology (severe atypia/carcinoma in situ [CIS] or UC) at time of frozen section analysis. RESULTS: Adverse pathology was identified by frozen section analysis in 178 patients (8.6%). Frozen section analysis was found to have poor sensitivity in identifying adverse pathology (59.1%), which was improved in patients with preoperative CIS (68.0%). After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 12.4 (1.9-10.1) years, 28 patients (1.4%) developed UTUC recurrence. There were no uretero-enteric anastomotic recurrences. Adverse pathology on frozen section analysis was associated with UTUC recurrence on univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 6.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-13.5), but 15/28 patients (54%) with UTUC recurrence had benign ureteric frozen section analysis on initial sectioning. Adverse pathology on frozen section analysis was not independently associated with the risk of local recurrence (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.61-1.89) or overall survival (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.94-1.35) in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteric frozen section analysis has poor sensitivity and may be marginally improved in pre-existing CIS. UTUC recurrence is rare and can occur despite negative frozen section analysis. Our data question the utility of routine frozen section analysis of the distal ureteric margin at the time of RC.
Authors: Anthony N Hoang; Piyush K Agarwal; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Christopher G Wood; Adam R Metwalli; Wassim Kassouf; Gordon A Brown; Peter C Black; Diana L Urbauer; H Barton Grossman; Colin P N Dinney; Ashish M Kamat Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Ganesh V Raj; Raanan Tal; Andrew Vickers; Bernard H Bochner; Angel Serio; S Machele Donat; Harry Herr; Semra Olgac; Guido Dalbagni Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Martin C Schumacher; Michael Scholz; Erik S Weise; Achim Fleischmann; George N Thalmann; Urs E Studer Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Georgios Gakis; Peter C Black; Bernard H Bochner; Stephen A Boorjian; Arnulf Stenzl; George N Thalmann; Wassim Kassouf Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Joanne Tang; Weranja Ranasinghe; Janice Cheng; Sabiena Van Es; Mike Monsour; Richard Cetti; Robert Jensen; Steve Brough Journal: Curr Urol Date: 2019-03-08
Authors: Francesco Claps; Maaike W van de Kamp; Roman Mayr; Peter J Bostrom; Joost L Boormans; Markus Eckstein; Laura S Mertens; Egbert R Boevé; Yann Neuzillet; Maximilian Burger; Damien Pouessel; Carlo Trombetta; Bernd Wullich; Theo H van der Kwast; Arndt Hartmann; Yves Allory; Yair Lotan; Shahrokh F Shariat; Tahlita C M Zuiverloon; M Carmen Mir; Bas W G van Rhijn Journal: World J Urol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 4.226