| Literature DB >> 29062573 |
Hong Sheng Cheng1, So Ha Ton1, Sonia Chew Wen Phang2, Joash Ban Lee Tan1, Khalid Abdul Kadir2.
Abstract
The present study aimed to examine the effects of the types of high-calorie diets (high-fat and high-fat-high-sucrose diets) and two different developmental stages (post-weaning and young adult) on the induction of metabolic syndrome. Male, post-weaning and adult (3- and 8-week old, respectively) Sprague Dawley rats were given control, high-fat (60% kcal), and high-fat-high-sucrose (60% kcal fat + 30% sucrose water) diets for eight weeks (n = 6 to 7 per group). Physical, biochemical, and transcriptional changes as well as liver histology were noted. Post-weaning rats had higher weight gain, abdominal fat mass, fasting glucose, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, faster hypertension onset, but lower circulating advanced glycation end products compared to adult rats. This is accompanied by upregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α and γ in the liver and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) in the visceral adipose tissue. Post-weaning rats on high-fat diet manifested all phenotypes of metabolic syndrome and increased hepatic steatosis, which are linked to increased hepatic and adipocyte PPARγ expression. Adult rats on high-fat-high-sucrose diet merely became obese and hypertensive within the same treatment duration. Thus, it is more effective and less time-consuming to induce metabolic syndrome in male post-weaning rats with high-fat diet compared to young adult rats. As male rats were selectively included into the study, the results may not be generalisable to all post-weaning rats and further investigation on female rats is required.Entities:
Keywords: Dyslipidaemia; Hepatic steatosis; High-fat diet; Hypertension; Obesity; Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
Year: 2017 PMID: 29062573 PMCID: PMC5645161 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2017.10.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Macronutrient composition and ingredients of control, high-fat and high-fat-high-sucrose diets.
| Macronutrient | Control diet | High-fat diet | High-fat-high-sucrose diet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein (kcal%) | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Carbohydrate (kcal%) | 70 | 20 | 20 |
| Lipid (kcal%) | 10 | 60 | 60 |
| Saturated (%) | 36.6 | 57.9 | 57.9 |
| Monounsaturated (%) | 29.0 | 28.8 | 28.8 |
| Polyunsaturated (%) | 32.0 | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Trans (%) | 1.8 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| Energy content (kcal/g) | 3.9 | 5.3 | 5.3 + 1.2 kcal/mL from sucrose water |
| Casein | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Corn starch | 525.5 | 18 | 18 |
| Maltodextrin | 125 | 125 | 125 |
| Sugar | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Cellulose | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Milk fat | 20 | 245 | 245 |
| Corn oil | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| AIN-93G Mineral mix | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| AIN-93-VX Vitamin mix | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Choline bitartrate | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | |
| Additional supplement | – | – | 30% (w/v) sucrose water |
Nucleotide sequences of the primers and hydrolysis probes.
| Target gene | Nucleotide sequence (5′ → 3′) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward primer | Reverse primer | Hydrolysis probe | |
| β-actin | GTA TGG GTC AGA AGG ACT CC | GTT CAA TGG GGT ACT TCA GG | [TET] CCT CTC TTG CTC TGG GC [BHQ1] |
| HPRT1 | CTG GAA AGA ACG TCT TGA TTG | GTA TCC AAC ACT TCG AGA GG | [6FAM] AGC CCC AAA /[ZEN]/ATG GTT AAG GTT GCA AG [Iowa Black® FQ] |
| RAGE | CCC TGA CCT GTG CCA TCT CT | GGG TGT GCC ATC TTT TAT CCA | [6FAM] CCC AGC CTC CCC CTC AAA TCC A [BHQ1] |
| PPARα | TGT GGA GAT CGG CCT GGC CTT | CCG GAT GGT TGC TCT GCA GGT | [6FAM] TGC AGG AGG GGA TTG TGC ACG TGC TCA [BHQ1] |
| PPARγ | CCC TGG CAA AGC ATT TGT AT | GGT GAT TTG TCT GTT GTC TTT C | [6FAM] TCC TTC CCG CTG ACC A [BHQ1] |
| LPL | CAG CAA GGC ATA CAG GTG | CGA GTC TTC AGG TAC ATC TTA C | [6FAM] TTC TCT TGG CTC TGA CC [BHQ1] |
HPRT1, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end product.
Denotes reference genes.
Fig. 1Cumulative weight gain of the post-weaning (A) and adult rats (B) as well as the retroperitoneal white adipose tissue mass (C) and daily calorie intake (D) of the rats on different diets for eight weeks. Error bars indicate SEM. The sample size was n = 6–7 per group. * indicates P < 0.05 between groups. CD, control diet; HFD, high-fat diet; HFSD, high-fat-high-sucrose diet; rWAT, retroperitoneal white adipose tissue.
Effects of HFD and HFSD on the consumption of food and water and glycaemic parameters of post-weaning and adult rats after eight-week long treatment.
| Parameter | Post-weaning rat | Adult rat | Post-weaning rat vs. Adult rat | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | HFD | HFSD | CD | HFD | HFSD | ||
| Food intake (g/day) | 18.11 ± 0.90 | 14.36 ± 0.37 | 8.06 ± 0.77 | 18.82 ± 0.89 | 12.31 ± 0.59 | 7.65 ± 0.52 | |
| Water intake (mL/day) | 21.59 ± 0.44 | 21.38 ± 0.73 | 23.71 ± 1.19 | 20.19 ± 0.90 | 19.70 ± 0.78 | 28.96 ± 1.17 | |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.52 ± 0.12 | 6.53 ± 0.15 | 5.84 ± 0.21 | 5.02 ± 0.18 | 5.12 ± 0.17 | 5.54 ± 0.20 | Post-weaning > Adult ( |
| HbA1c (%) | 3.81 ± 0.42 | 5.95 ± 0.51 | 5.72 ± 0.63 | 5.01 ± 0.31 | 5.73 ± 0.50 | 5.75 ± 0.32 | |
| AGE (µg/mL) | 61.23 ± 15.45 | 79.85 ± 5.62 | 43.48 ± 7.41 | 104.56 ± 23.66 | 114.46 ± 17.81 | 61.85 ± 7.80 | Post-weaning < Adult ( |
| FPI (mU/L) | 10.96 ± 1.95 | 5.69 ± 0.70 | 7.94 ± 1.06 | 6.51 ± 1.37 | 10.47 ± 3.46 | 8.91 ± 3.28 | |
| HOMA-IR | 1.26 ± 0.21 | 0.72 ± 0.10 | 0.82 ± 0.08 | 0.63 ± 0.16 | 0.87 ± 0.23 | 0.67 ± 0.19 | |
| HOMA%β (%) | 108.0 ± 12.9 | 40.8 ± 2.9 | 63.8 ± 3.9 | 81.4 ± 17.5 | 80.0 ± 21.7 | 47.9 ± 8.0 | |
| HOMA%S (%) | 92.9 ± 19.9 | 132.4 ± 13.4 | 116.5 ± 13.2 | 129.0 ± 20.0 | 89.8 ± 14.2 | 119.3 ± 32.8 | |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. The sample size was n = 6–7 per group.
AGE, advanced glycation end products; CD, control diet; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; FPI, fasting plasma insulin; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin A1c; HFD, high-fat diet; HFSD, high-fat-high-sucrose diet; HOMA %β, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function; HOMA%S, homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; NS, non-significant.
P < 0.05 compared to CD.
P < 0.01 compared to CD.
P < 0.001 compared to CD.
P < 0.05 compared to HFD.
P < 0.001 compared to HFD.
Fig. 2Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of the post-weaning (A and C) and adult (B and D) rats on different diets over eight weeks. Error bars indicate SEM. The sample size was n = 6–7 per group. * indicates P < 0.05, ** indicates P < 0.01 and *** indicates P < 0.001 between groups.
Effects of HFD and HFSD on the lipid profile and hepatic lipid deposition of post-weaning and adult rats after eight-week long treatment.
| Parameter | Post-weaning rat | Adult rat | Post-weaning rat vs. Adult rat | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | HFD | HFSD | CD | HFD | HFSD | ||
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.08 ± 0.07 | 1.88 ± 0.29 | 1.15 ± 0.11 | 1.30 ± 0.19 | 0.95 ± 0.16 | 1.59 ± 0.17 | |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.80 ± 0.22 | 2.16 ± 0.20 | 1.59 ± 0.10 | 2.11 ± 0.21 | 1.79 ± 0.22 | 1.32 ± 0.07 | |
| HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.54 ± 0.18 | 1.17 ± 0.08 | 0.94 ± 0.09 | 1.23 ± 0.21 | 1.12 ± 0.14 | 0.51 ± 0.07 | Post-weaning > Adult |
| Non-HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 0.55 ± 0.10 | 1.12 ± 0.32 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.58 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.09 | |
| NEFA (mmol/L) | 0.57 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.46 ± 0.07 | 0.66 ± 0.12 | 0.45 ± 0.07 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | |
| Hepatic lipid deposition (%) | 1.95 ± 0.33 | 4.26 ± 0.33 | 4.14 ± 0.64 | 1.29 ± 0.17 | 1.80 ± 0.17 | 2.53 ± 0.33 | Post-weaning > Adult |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. The sample size was n = 6–7 per group.
CD, control diet; HFD, high-fat diet; HFSD, high-fat-high-sucrose diet; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acids; NS, non-significant.
P < 0.05 compared to CD.
P < 0.01 compared to CD.
P < 0.001 compared to CD.
P < 0.01 compared to HFD.
Fig. 3Representative H&E-stained liver sections (x200 magnification) of the post-weaning and adult rats given different diets for eight weeks. The black arrows indicate the lipid deposition sites in the liver tissues. The sample size was n = 6–7 per group.
Fig. 4Normalized Ct values (ΔCt) of RAGE expression in the liver (A) and rWAT (B) of the post-weaning and adult rats on different diets at the end of eight-week treatment. HPRT1 and β-actin were used as reference genes. Error bars indicate SEM. The sample size was 6–7 per group. RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end products; rWAT, retroperitoneal white adipose tissue.
Fig. 5Normalized Ct values (ΔCt) of PPARγ in the rWAT (A) and liver (B), LPL in the rWAT (C) and PPARα in the liver (D) of post-weaning and adult rats on different diets at the end of eight-week treatment. HPRT1 and β-actin were used as reference genes. Error bars indicate SEM. The sample size was 6–7 per group. * indicates P < 0.05, ** indicates P < 0.01 between groups. LPL, lipoprotein lipase; PPARα, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ; rWAT, retroperitoneal white adipose tissue.