Literature DB >> 29061760

Combinations of Respiratory Chain Inhibitors Have Enhanced Bactericidal Activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Bryan J Berube1, Tanya Parish2.   

Abstract

As an obligate aerobe, Mycobacterium tuberculosis uses its electron transport chain (ETC) to produce energy via oxidative phosphorylation. This pathway has recently garnered a lot of attention and is a target for several new antimycobacterials. We tested the respiratory adaptation of M. tuberculosis to phenoxyalkylbenzimidazoles (PABs), compounds proposed to target QcrB, a component of the cytochrome bc1 complex. We show that M. tuberculosis is able to reroute its ETC to provide temporary resistance to PABs. However, combination treatment of PAB with agents targeting other components of the electron transport chain overcomes this respiratory flexibility. PAB in combination with clofazimine resulted in synergistic killing of M. tuberculosis under both replicating and nonreplicating conditions. PABs in combination with bedaquiline demonstrated antagonism at early time points, particularly under nonreplicating conditions. However, this antagonistic effect disappeared within 3 weeks, when PAB-BDQ combinations became highly bactericidal; in some cases, they were better than either drug alone. This study highlights the potential for combination treatment targeting the ETC and supports the development of PABs as part of a novel drug regimen against M. tuberculosis.
Copyright © 2017 Berube and Parish.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mycobacterium; antibacterial; bactericidal; respiration; tuberculosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29061760      PMCID: PMC5740367          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01677-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


INTRODUCTION

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB) and the leading cause of death by infectious disease in the world (1). With 1.8 million attributable deaths and nearly 11 million new infections in 2015, TB is not only a major health burden, but it also contributes a societal and economic burden of ∼$12 billion annually (1). In addition, there is an alarming increase in the rate of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) M. tuberculosis, which not only lengthens the normal drug regimen from 6 months to 2 years but still causes a mortality rate in treated individuals of ∼50%. Given these facts, there is a dire need for the discovery of novel preventatives and therapeutics to combat M. tuberculosis infections. M. tuberculosis is an obligate aerobe and, as such, performs respiration for energy production via the electron transport chain (ETC) and oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos). During OxPhos, M. tuberculosis uses energy derived from nutrients to shuttle electrons through a menaquinone intermediate to oxygen via a branched respiratory chain (2, 3). During replicative growth, electrons are shuttled to a cytochrome bc1-aa3-type oxidase (cyt-bc), which is energetically efficient due to its proton-pumping capabilities. As electrons flow through cyt-bc, protons are pumped across the membrane to help establish an electrochemical gradient that is used by ATP synthase to generate ATP. Under hypoxic and stress-inducing conditions, electrons can transfer directly to the less energetically favorable but higher-affinity cytochrome bd oxidase (cyt-bd). Electron transfer to cyt-bd does not allow for the efficient establishment of a proton gradient, but it does serve to balance redox equivalents and maintain the proton motive force across the membrane (3). Recently, much attention has been focused on a group of inhibitors that target different components of the mycobacterial ETC. Bedaquiline, recently approved by the FDA for limited use in MDR-TB patients, targets ATP synthase and presumably inhibits the growth of M. tuberculosis by depleting ATP stores within the cell (4–6). Clofazimine (CFZ), originally an antileprosy drug, serves as a direct competitor of menaquinone by shuttling electrons from the NADH dehydrogenase (NDH-2) to oxygen (7). Upon reoxidation by O2, CFZ releases reactive oxygen species (ROS) that kill M. tuberculosis (8). In addition, a number of compound series appear to target QcrB, a component of the cytochrome bc1 complex, and result in the depletion of intracellular ATP stores (9–11). Of these, the most advanced is Q203, which has recently entered into clinical trials (12). The phenoxyalkylbenzimidazoles (PABs) are a series of compounds in the early stages of development that have shown promising activity against M. tuberculosis (13). Originally identified from a high-throughput screen (14), PABs are highly adaptable compounds with MICs against M. tuberculosis in the low nanomolar range. PABs exhibit good selectivity for M. tuberculosis, as they inhibit the growth of M. tuberculosis inside macrophages with little to no cytotoxicity against eukaryotic cells (13). We recently identified the probable target of PABs to be QcrB (32), indicating that this series of compounds likely works by inhibiting the cytochrome bc1 reductase. Combinations of ETC-targeting compounds have the potential for synergistic activity. For example, combinations of CFZ with BDQ or Q203 demonstrated enhanced killing of M. tuberculosis compared to individual drug treatments (15), thus highlighting the potential efficacy of this approach in establishing new drug regimens. In this study, we tested PABs against a range of strains and confirmed that respiratory flexibility can affect sensitivity to this series, as a strain lacking the cytochrome bd oxidase is more sensitive to PABs. However, this respiratory flexibility can be overcome by using PABs in combination with other agents. Here, we demonstrate the synergistic killing of M. tuberculosis with PAB and CFZ against both replicating and nonreplicating bacteria.

RESULTS

M. tuberculosis has a respiratory flexibility that responds to the inhibition of QcrB by upregulating the alternative cytochrome bd oxidase (15, 16). This response has been seen with several different compound series which apparently target QcrB directly (16). To determine whether this holds true for PAB compounds, we looked at the ability of the PAB series to inhibit bacterial growth against different variants of M. tuberculosis H37Rv (Fig. 1). The key laboratory strains of H37Rv exist as two different ATCC types (ATCC 25618 and ATCC 27294), which have a number of genotypic differences (17). Since previous work demonstrating respiratory remodeling used H37Rv ATCC 27294, we compared the effectiveness of the PAB series against this strain in comparison to the strain in use in our laboratory (ATCC 2618).
FIG 1

Phenoxyalkylbenzamidazole compounds used in this study.

Phenoxyalkylbenzamidazole compounds used in this study. Strain H37Rv-MA was slightly more resistant to PAB compounds than strain H37Rv-LP (up to 5-fold increase), but large shifts (>10-fold) were not seen (Table 1). There was also a change in sensitivity to CFZ, BDQ, and rifampin, suggesting that these small changes between parental strains are not specific and may relate to differences in the cell wall. However, in the cydA::aph mutant strain (in the H37Rv-MA background), PAB compounds were significantly more active than against the parental strain, with a 3- to 9-fold increase in potency. In addition, this strain was also slightly more susceptible to CFZ and BDQ, which target other components of the ETC (Table 1). There was no change in rifampin susceptibility, indicating that the differences in the cydC::aph mutant strain are not due to a general increase in susceptibility to antimicrobials; rather, this strain is more sensitive to perturbation of the ETC.
TABLE 1

Activities of PAB compounds against M. tuberculosis strains

CompoundMIC (μM)a
H37Rv-LPH37Rv-MAH37Rv-MA cydC::aph
IDR-03419300.340.780.14
IDR-03515531.15.30.62
IDR-03419391.72.70.82
IDR-03419260.441.60.18
IDR-03574330.340.790.17
Clofazimine0.210.460.19
Bedaquiline0.240.700.43
Rifampin0.0080.0360.031

ETC-targeting compounds and rifampin were tested against select M. tuberculosis strains. MIC is calculated as the concentration at which growth is inhibited by 90%. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

Activities of PAB compounds against M. tuberculosis strains ETC-targeting compounds and rifampin were tested against select M. tuberculosis strains. MIC is calculated as the concentration at which growth is inhibited by 90%. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Disruption of the cyd locus also resulted in a striking change in the shape of the concentration-response curves (CRCs) with PAB compounds. In both parental strains, H37Rv-LP and H37Rv-MA, there were gradual reductions in growth with increasing concentrations of compounds, resulting in a shallow curve, with Hill slopes of −3.13 and −2.57, respectively (Fig. 2A). In contrast, in the cydC::aph mutant strain, the curves were steeper and achieved complete inhibition of growth at much lower concentrations, with a Hill slope of −8.5 (Fig. 2A). Of interest, the same phenomenon was seen in Mycobacterium smegmatis, a bacterial species generally insensitive to PAB compounds (13). For the wild-type strain, mc2155, an MIC could not be calculated, as there was still ∼30% growth at the highest concentration tested (Hill slope, −3.3; Fig. 2B). The M. smegmatis ΔcydA mutant strain was more sensitive to IDR-0341930 (MIC, 110 μM) and displayed a steeper slope (Hill slope, −5.4; Fig. 2B). Together, these data indicate that the cyd system affects the activities of PAB compounds. The shallowness of the inhibition curves in relation to the cyd mutants suggests an adaptive response that allows reduced growth in direct proportion to compound concentration, consistent with the hypothesis that switching to the only other terminal oxidase (cyt-bd) occurs and is sufficient to sustain some short-term growth.
FIG 2

cyt-bd confers resistance to PAB compounds. Concentration-response curves for IDR-0341930 against M. tuberculosis (A) or M. smegmatis (B) strains. (C) Kill kinetics of IDR-0341930 against aerobically growing M. tuberculosis H37Rv-MA or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph. IDR-0341930 was added at 10× the MIC of the individual strains. Data are representative are at least three independent experiments. The dotted line represents the limit of detection (10 bacteria/ml).

cyt-bd confers resistance to PAB compounds. Concentration-response curves for IDR-0341930 against M. tuberculosis (A) or M. smegmatis (B) strains. (C) Kill kinetics of IDR-0341930 against aerobically growing M. tuberculosis H37Rv-MA or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph. IDR-0341930 was added at 10× the MIC of the individual strains. Data are representative are at least three independent experiments. The dotted line represents the limit of detection (10 bacteria/ml). We wanted to determine if respiratory remodeling affected compound-mediated bactericidal activity, so we determined the kill kinetics by exposing each strain to 10× their respective MICs. The PAB series is bacteriostatic against aerobically grown replicating M. tuberculosis (13). We confirmed that a representative PAB compound (IDR-0341930) has the same profile against H37Rv-MA, where it was unable to effect a 3-log reduction in 21 days, even at 10× its MIC (Fig. 2C). In the absence of inhibitory compounds, the cydC::aph mutant strain has growth kinetics identical to the parental strain (data not shown). However, the cydC::aph mutant was more sensitive to IDR-0341930, with a low rate of kill, resulting in a >3-log reduction in CFU after 21 days (Fig. 2C). These data confirmed the importance of the cytochrome bd oxidase as an adaptive response to QcrB inhibition. The dose-response curves in Fig. 2A show that PAB compounds begin to inhibit the growth of H37Rv-MA and the cydC::aph mutant strain at about the same concentrations. However, there appears to be a concentration of PAB compound above which the cydC::aph mutant strain is no longer able to grow and instead becomes susceptible to killing by PAB compounds. This strongly suggests that M. tuberculosis uses the cytochrome bd oxidase for survival in response to QcrB inhibition. Since the respiratory adaptation of M. tuberculosis affects the potency of PAB compounds, we hypothesized that we would see synergy with other agents that target the ETC, as these might overcome ETC rerouting. Therefore, we tested whether PABs work synergistically with CFZ and BDQ. We exposed M. tuberculosis H37Rv-LP to drug combinations for 7 days in a 96-well plate and plated it for viability. The PAB compound enhanced the antibacterial activity of CFZ in a range of combinations from 0.1× to 100× the MIC (Fig. 3). IDR-0341930 at 10× the MIC led to reduced viability in combination with either 1× or 10× the MIC of CFZ compared to either IDR-0341930 or CFZ alone (Fig. 3). Even combinations at 1× the MIC of each compound resulted in reduced bacterial viability compared to individual compound treatments (Fig. 3).
FIG 3

PAB has synergistic bactericidal activity in combination with CFZ. IDR-0341930 and CFZ were tested singly and in combination at the indicated multiples of the MIC against H37Rv-LP for 7 days. Liquid cultures from a 96-well plate were spot-plated onto 7H10-OADC agar. Pictures are representative of two independent experiments.

PAB has synergistic bactericidal activity in combination with CFZ. IDR-0341930 and CFZ were tested singly and in combination at the indicated multiples of the MIC against H37Rv-LP for 7 days. Liquid cultures from a 96-well plate were spot-plated onto 7H10-OADC agar. Pictures are representative of two independent experiments. To quantify the increased activity of combinations, we performed kill kinetic assays to enumerate viable bacteria after exposure in liquid medium. Compound concentrations were adjusted for each strain depending on their respective MICs. Consistent with our previous data (Fig. 2), IDR-0341930 was bacteriostatic against H37Rv-LP and H37Rv-MA (Fig. 4A and B) but had increased bactericidal activity against H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (Fig. 4C). In contrast, CFZ at 10× the MIC resulted in complete culture sterilization within 21 days for H37Rv-LP (Fig. 4A). For the H37Rv-MA strains (wild type and cydC::aph mutant), CFZ did not lead to complete sterilization, with an initial decrease in CFU followed by recovery, possibly due to outgrowth of resistant mutants, upregulation of intrinsic resistance mechanisms, or compound instability (Fig. 2B and C). When given in combination, PAB and CFZ at 10× the MIC were more effective against all three strains, with sterilization of the cultures occurring within 17 days (Fig. 4A to C). At lower concentrations of CFZ roughly equivalent to the MIC, combination with 10× the MIC of PAB led to an increase in bactericidal activity, with almost complete sterilization by 21 days for all three strains. CFZ alone resulted in delayed growth over 10 days but had complete outgrowth by 21 days (Fig. 4D to F). Together, these data highlight the synergistic bactericidal activity of PAB and CFZ in combination.
FIG 4

PAB-CFZ combination causes enhanced killing of M. tuberculosis under replicating conditions. Kill kinetics under replicating conditions of IDR-0341930 at 10× the MIC in combination with CFZ at either 10× the MIC (A to C) or 1× the MIC. Combinations were tested against H37Rv-LP (A and D), H37Rv-MA (B and E), or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (H37Rv-MA cydKO) (C and F). Samples were taken at the indicated times. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. The dotted lines represent the upper and lower limits of detection (108 and 10 bacteria/ml, respectively).

PAB-CFZ combination causes enhanced killing of M. tuberculosis under replicating conditions. Kill kinetics under replicating conditions of IDR-0341930 at 10× the MIC in combination with CFZ at either 10× the MIC (A to C) or 1× the MIC. Combinations were tested against H37Rv-LP (A and D), H37Rv-MA (B and E), or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (H37Rv-MA cydKO) (C and F). Samples were taken at the indicated times. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. The dotted lines represent the upper and lower limits of detection (108 and 10 bacteria/ml, respectively). We next tested IDR-0341930 in combination with BDQ. The addition of IDR-0341930 to BDQ at high concentrations had no effect against the H37Rv-MA strains and a small additive effect against H37Rv-LP at the last time point (Fig. 5A to C). Similarly, at lower concentrations of BDQ, the addition of IDR-0341930 only increased activity against H37Rv-LP but not against the H37Rv-MA strains (Fig. 5D to F). If anything, for the H37Rv-MA cydC::aph strain, PAB and BDQ were antagonistic at the earliest time points (10 to 15 days), although this effect disappeared by 21 days (Fig. 5C). When IDR-0341930 was tested in combination with rifampin, as a control compound not targeting the ETC, there was no additive activity between the two compounds (data not shown).
FIG 5

PAB and BDQ show minimal synergistic activity. Kill kinetics under replicating conditions of IDR-0341930 at 10× the MIC in combination with BDQ at either 10× the MIC (A to C) or 1× the MIC. Combinations were tested against H37Rv-LP (A and D), H37Rv-MA (B and E), or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (H37Rv-MA cydKO) (C and F). Samples were taken at the indicated times. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. The dotted lines represent the upper and lower limits of detection (108 and 10 bacteria/ml, respectively).

PAB and BDQ show minimal synergistic activity. Kill kinetics under replicating conditions of IDR-0341930 at 10× the MIC in combination with BDQ at either 10× the MIC (A to C) or 1× the MIC. Combinations were tested against H37Rv-LP (A and D), H37Rv-MA (B and E), or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (H37Rv-MA cydKO) (C and F). Samples were taken at the indicated times. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. The dotted lines represent the upper and lower limits of detection (108 and 10 bacteria/ml, respectively). A major benefit of PAB compounds is their sterilizing activity against nutrient-starved nonreplicating M. tuberculosis (13). We tested whether CFZ or BDQ could enhance this sterilizing activity in M. tuberculosis under starvation. As seen previously, IDR-0341930 had sterilizing activity against H37Rv-LP over a 17-day period (Fig. 6A). CFZ alone was less active, with a <2-log reduction (Fig. 6A). The PAB-CFZ combination treatment had slightly enhanced activity but did not drastically alter the kill kinetics against H37Rv-LP compared to IDR-0341930 alone (Fig. 6A). H37Rv-MA was slightly more resistant to killing by IDR-0341930, as there was an initial delay in kill compared to H37Rv-LP before the strain was sterilized by 21 days (Fig. 6B). Similar to H37Rv-LP, IDR-0341930 had slightly enhanced sterilizing capabilities against H37Rv-MA when given in combination with CFZ (Fig. 6B), although this too was not drastic. When the IDR-0341930–CFZ combination was tested against H37Rv-MA cydC::aph, there was a drastic reduction in CFU with sterilization of the culture in less than 10 days (Fig. 6C). Taken together, these data show that CFZ and PAB compounds have synergistic activity under both replicating and nonreplicating conditions and that this combination can overcome any respiratory remodeling in the bacteria.
FIG 6

PAB-CFZ combination causes enhanced killing of M. tuberculosis under starvation conditions. Kill kinetics under PBS-starved conditions of IDR-0341930 and CFZ at 10× the MIC against H37Rv-LP (A), H37Rv-MA (B), or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (H37Rv-MA cydKO) (C). Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. The dotted line represents the lower limit of detection (10 bacteria/ml).

PAB-CFZ combination causes enhanced killing of M. tuberculosis under starvation conditions. Kill kinetics under PBS-starved conditions of IDR-0341930 and CFZ at 10× the MIC against H37Rv-LP (A), H37Rv-MA (B), or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (H37Rv-MA cydKO) (C). Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. The dotted line represents the lower limit of detection (10 bacteria/ml). We also tested BDQ in combination with PAB. As expected from an agent with activity against nonreplicating bacteria (6), we saw a time-dependent decrease in bacterial viability for all three strains treated with BDQ (Fig. 7). Surprisingly, we saw antagonism between BDQ and PAB at early time points, with bacteria surviving better under combination treatment than with individual drugs. For all strains, this antagonism disappeared within 2 to 3 weeks, at which point all cultures became sterilized (Fig. 7).
FIG 7

PAB-BDQ combinations are active under starvation conditions but are antagonistic at early time points. Kill kinetics under PBS-starved conditions of IDR-0341930 and BDQ at 10× the MIC against H37Rv-LP (A), H37Rv-MA (B), or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (H37Rv-MA cydKO) (C). Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. The dotted line represents the lower limit of detection (10 bacteria/ml).

PAB-BDQ combinations are active under starvation conditions but are antagonistic at early time points. Kill kinetics under PBS-starved conditions of IDR-0341930 and BDQ at 10× the MIC against H37Rv-LP (A), H37Rv-MA (B), or H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (H37Rv-MA cydKO) (C). Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. The dotted line represents the lower limit of detection (10 bacteria/ml).

DISCUSSION

The mycobacterial electron transport chain has garnered significant attention as a novel pathway for chemical inhibition. M. tuberculosis can adapt to changing environmental conditions or chemical inhibition of the cyt-bc by switching the respiratory pathway to use of the cytochrome bd oxidase (15, 16, 18). We show that this respiratory flexibility also occurs in response to treatment with PAB compounds, and a strain lacking cytochrome bd is more sensitive to both inhibition of growth and killing by PABs. Any new treatment for M. tuberculosis is sure to be given in combination with other antimycobacterial drugs. This opens the possibility of combination therapies targeting the ETC, which would have the dual benefit of limiting the possibility of resistant mutant generation and counteracting M. tuberculosis respiratory flexibility and tolerance networks (2, 19). Kalia and colleagues recently provided support for this idea by describing a synthetic lethal relationship in a mouse model of infection when using Q203 to target QcrB in a strain with a genetic knockout of cyt-bd (20). Additionally, a combination of Q203 and CFZ is more active against M. tuberculosis cultures than either compound alone (15). Our data support the concept that any inhibitor of QcrB would have synergy with CFZ, as we see similar results with an entirely different QcrB-targeting compound series. We also demonstrate that this synergy occurs under nonreplicating conditions as well. This is an important finding due to the heterogeneity among lesion types found in both human and mouse infections where bacteria can reside in distinct microenvironments containing various levels of nutrients and/or oxygen tensions (21, 22). Drug combinations active against multiple states of M. tuberculosis growth and/or persistence will allow for enhanced killing and a reduced rate of resistant mutant generation. A major benefit of PAB-CFZ combination treatment is that the compounds appear to work synergistically against M. tuberculosis across a range of concentrations, and this effect is seen with more than one method of measurement. The fact that this synergy is seen both at low (including subinhibitory concentrations) and high (10× the inhibitory concentrations) concentrations is important, since during treatment, the effective concentrations of drugs at the infection site are likely to vary. It was interesting to note that at lower concentrations of CFZ, there was a delay in the time before bacterial death was observed. This delay is likely due to initial rerouting of the ETC following chemical inhibition of QcrB and/or NDH-2, which can maintain viability over a short time. However, with sustained treatment, the lethal effect of the drug combination eventually overcomes any respiratory adaptation. We saw minimal synergy between PAB and BDQ, consistent with previous reports that a Q203-BDQ combination had kill kinetics nearly identical to that of BDQ alone (15). However, we did see antagonism between IDR-0341930 and BDQ at early time points, particularly under starvation conditions (Fig. 5 and 7). This is surprising, since QcrB inhibitors result in reduced intracellular ATP levels (11, 23) and so seem to be ideal candidates for combination treatment with BDQ. However, similar effects have been seen in M. smegmatis, where mutant strains with a deletion of the cytochrome bc1 system are less sensitive to BDQ (24). Additionally, BDQ treatment leads to a transient increase in ATP levels in M. tuberculosis, possibly due to rerouting of respiration or increases in substrate-level phosphorylation. This effect may account for the antagonism. BDQ may also have other effects, and recent data suggest it can act as an uncoupler, allowing proton flow across the membrane without the benefit of ATP production (25). An alternative possibility is that the upregulation of the bd oxidase induced by BDQ could antagonize PAB activity (16, 26, 27); since Q203 also induced bd oxidase, the combination might lead to even greater expression than either drug treatment alone, in the process conferring enhanced protection to PAB-BDQ treatment until ATP levels are sufficiently suppressed so as to cause bacterial killing. Understanding the precise mechanisms of action of the different compounds will be important to predict their effect in combination. These different possibilities are under investigation. The work described herein highlights combination drug treatments that are highly effective at killing M. tuberculosis under both aerobic and starvation conditions, particularly PAB-CFZ. Future work will need to focus on understanding the true extent of respiratory flexibility of the mycobacterial ETC in order to determine the optimal combination of ETC-targeting compounds. More detailed understanding, including transcriptional profiling, of the rerouting of the ETC in response to chemical or genetic perturbations will allow for the rational design of combination treatments to most effectively kill M. tuberculosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

M. tuberculosis H37Rv-LP (London Pride) (ATCC 25618) (17), H37Rv-MA (ATCC 27294) (provided by Chris Sassetti), H37Rv-MA cydC::aph (28) (provided by Helena Boshoff), M. smegmatis mc2155, and M. smegmatis mc2155 ΔcydA (29) (provided by Bavesh Kana) were used in this study. Mycobacterial strains were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 medium containing 10% (vol/vol) oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC) supplement (Becton Dickinson) and 0.05% (wt/vol) Tween 80 (7H9-Tw-OADC) under aerobic conditions.

Determination of MIC.

MICs were determined as previously described (30); briefly, MICs were determined against M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis strains grown in 7H9-Tw-OADC under aerobic conditions. M. tuberculosis growth was measured by the optical density at 590 nm (OD590) after 5 days of incubation at 37°C, while M. smegmatis growth was measured after 24 h. The MIC is defined as the concentration of compound required to inhibit the growth of M. tuberculosis by 90% and was determined from the Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares plot (31).

Determination of compound kill kinetics.

Compound kill kinetics were performed as previously described (13). Briefly, M. tuberculosis was grown in 7H9-Tw-OADC. Standing cultures were inoculated with 1 × 105 CFU/ml and compound at the indicated dose (final dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO] concentration of 2%). Starved cells were generated by resuspending M. tuberculosis in phosphate-buffered saline plus 0.05% tyloxapol (PBS-Ty) at 1 × 105 CFU/ml and incubating at 37°C standing for 2 weeks before adding compounds. Cultures were serially diluted and plated onto 7H10-OADC agar, and the CFU were counted after 3 to 4 weeks of incubation at 37°C. For the spot-based assay, bacteria and compounds were cultured in 96-well plates for 7 days. Cultures were diluted 1:10 using a plate stamper (Sorenson Biosciences), and 5 μl from each well was stamped onto 7H10-OADC agar.
  30 in total

1.  Susceptibility testing: accurate and reproducible minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and non-inhibitory concentration (NIC) values.

Authors:  R J Lambert; J Pearson
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 2.  Oxidative Phosphorylation as a Target Space for Tuberculosis: Success, Caution, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Gregory M Cook; Kiel Hards; Elyse Dunn; Adam Heikal; Yoshio Nakatani; Chris Greening; Dean C Crick; Fabio L Fontes; Kevin Pethe; Erik Hasenoehrl; Michael Berney
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2017-06

3.  Respiratory flexibility in response to inhibition of cytochrome C oxidase in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Kriti Arora; Bernardo Ochoa-Montaño; Patricia S Tsang; Tom L Blundell; Stephanie S Dawes; Valerie Mizrahi; Tracy Bayliss; Claire J Mackenzie; Laura A T Cleghorn; Peter C Ray; Paul G Wyatt; Eugene Uh; Jinwoo Lee; Clifton E Barry; Helena I Boshoff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Bactericidal mode of action of bedaquiline.

Authors:  Kiel Hards; Jennifer R Robson; Michael Berney; Lisa Shaw; Dirk Bald; Anil Koul; Koen Andries; Gregory M Cook
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Reduction of clofazimine by mycobacterial type 2 NADH:quinone oxidoreductase: a pathway for the generation of bactericidal levels of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Takahiro Yano; Sacha Kassovska-Bratinova; J Shin Teh; Jeffrey Winkler; Kevin Sullivan; Andre Isaacs; Norman M Schechter; Harvey Rubin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Arrival of Imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole-5-carboxamides: Potent Anti-tuberculosis Agents That Target QcrB.

Authors:  Garrett C Moraski; Natalie Seeger; Patricia A Miller; Allen G Oliver; Helena I Boshoff; Sanghyun Cho; Surafel Mulugeta; Jeffery R Anderson; Scott G Franzblau; Marvin J Miller
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.084

Review 7.  Targeting Energy Metabolism in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a New Paradigm in Antimycobacterial Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Dirk Bald; Cristina Villellas; Ping Lu; Anil Koul
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 7.867

8.  A dual read-out assay to evaluate the potency of compounds active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Juliane Ollinger; Mai Ann Bailey; Garrett C Moraski; Allen Casey; Stephanie Florio; Torey Alling; Marvin J Miller; Tanya Parish
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Identification of novel imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine inhibitors targeting M. tuberculosis QcrB.

Authors:  Katherine A Abrahams; Jonathan A G Cox; Vickey L Spivey; Nicholas J Loman; Mark J Pallen; Chrystala Constantinidou; Raquel Fernández; Carlos Alemparte; Modesto J Remuiñán; David Barros; Lluis Ballell; Gurdyal S Besra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bedaquiline and Pyrazinamide Treatment Responses Are Affected by Pulmonary Lesion Heterogeneity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infected C3HeB/FeJ Mice.

Authors:  Scott M Irwin; Brendan Prideaux; Edward R Lyon; Matthew D Zimmerman; Elizabeth J Brooks; Christopher A Schrupp; Chao Chen; Matthew J Reichlen; Bryce C Asay; Martin I Voskuil; Eric L Nuermberger; Koen Andries; Michael A Lyons; Véronique Dartois; Anne J Lenaerts
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.084

View more
  15 in total

1.  Assessment of Clofazimine and TB47 Combination Activity against Mycobacterium abscessus Using a Bioluminescent Approach.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yaoju Tan; M Mahmudul Islam; Yuanyuan Cao; Xiaoyun Lu; Sheng Zeng; H M Adnan Hameed; Peipei Zhou; Xingshan Cai; Shuai Wang; Julius N Mugweru; Guoliang Zhang; Huancai Yin; Jianxiong Liu; Eric Nuermberger; Tianyu Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Triazolopyrimidines Target Aerobic Respiration in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Catherine Shelton; Matthew McNeil; Renee Allen; Lindsay Flint; Dara Russell; Bryan Berube; Aaron Korkegian; Yulia Ovechkina; Tanya Parish
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Bacterial Oxidases of the Cytochrome bd Family: Redox Enzymes of Unique Structure, Function, and Utility As Drug Targets.

Authors:  Vitaliy B Borisov; Sergey A Siletsky; Alessandro Paiardini; David Hoogewijs; Elena Forte; Alessandro Giuffrè; Robert K Poole
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 7.468

4.  The anti-mycobacterial activity of the cytochrome bcc inhibitor Q203 can be enhanced by small-molecule inhibition of cytochrome bd.

Authors:  Ping Lu; Amer H Asseri; Martijn Kremer; Janneke Maaskant; Roy Ummels; Holger Lill; Dirk Bald
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Novel MenA Inhibitors Are Bactericidal against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Synergize with Electron Transport Chain Inhibitors.

Authors:  Bryan J Berube; Dara Russell; Lina Castro; Seoung-Ryoung Choi; Prabagaran Narayanasamy; Tanya Parish
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Identification of 4-Amino-Thieno[2,3-d]Pyrimidines as QcrB Inhibitors in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Gregory A Harrison; Anne E Mayer Bridwell; Megh Singh; Keshav Jayaraman; Leslie A Weiss; Rachel L Kinsella; Janessa S Aneke; Kelly Flentie; Miranda E Schene; Margaret Gaggioli; Samantha D Solomon; Scott A Wildman; Marvin J Meyers; Christina L Stallings
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.389

7.  Sterilizing Effects of Novel Regimens Containing TB47, Clofazimine, and Linezolid in a Murine Model of Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Wei Yu; Buhari Yusuf; Shuai Wang; Xirong Tian; H M Adnan Hameed; Zhili Lu; Gift Chiwala; Md Shah Alam; Gregory M Cook; Dmitry A Maslov; Nanshan Zhong; Tianyu Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Nitric Oxide-Dependent Electron Transport Chain Inhibition by the Cytochrome bc1 Inhibitor and Pretomanid Combination Kills Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Sheng Zeng; Jingran Zhang; Mingwei Sun; Xiaofei Zhang; Gregory M Cook; Tianyu Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Arylvinylpiperazine Amides, a New Class of Potent Inhibitors Targeting QcrB of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Caroline S Foo; Andréanne Lupien; Maryline Kienle; Anthony Vocat; Andrej Benjak; Raphael Sommer; Dirk A Lamprecht; Adrie J C Steyn; Kevin Pethe; Jérémie Piton; Karl-Heinz Altmann; Stewart T Cole
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Intracellular and in vivo evaluation of imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole-5-carboxamide anti-tuberculosis compounds.

Authors:  Garrett C Moraski; Nathalie Deboosère; Kate L Marshall; Heath A Weaver; Alexandre Vandeputte; Courtney Hastings; Lisa Woolhiser; Anne J Lenaerts; Priscille Brodin; Marvin J Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.