Literature DB >> 29061725

Relationship Between 24-Hour Ambulatory Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Mass: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Thomas Weber1, Siegfried Wassertheurer2, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss2, Enrique Rodilla2, Cornelia Ablasser2, Piotr Jankowski2, Maria Lorenza Muiesan2, Cristina Giannattasio2, Claudia Mang2, Ian Wilkinson2, Jörg Kellermair2, Bernhard Hametner2, Jose Maria Pascual2, Robert Zweiker2, Danuta Czarnecka2, Anna Paini2, Massimo Salvetti2, Alessandro Maloberti2, Carmel McEniery2.   

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between left ventricular mass and brachial office as well as brachial and central ambulatory systolic blood pressure in 7 European centers. Central systolic pressure was measured with a validated oscillometric device, using a transfer function, and mean/diastolic pressure calibration. M-mode images were obtained by echocardiography, and left ventricular mass was determined by one single reader blinded to blood pressure. We studied 289 participants (137 women) free from antihypertensive drugs (mean age: 50.8 years). Mean office blood pressure was 145/88 mm Hg and mean brachial and central ambulatory systolic pressures were 127 and 128 mm Hg, respectively. Mean left ventricular mass was 93.3 kg/m2, and 25.6% had left ventricular hypertrophy. The correlation coefficient between left ventricular mass and brachial office, brachial ambulatory, and central ambulatory systolic pressure was 0.29, 0.41, and 0.47, respectively (P=0.003 for comparison between brachial office and central ambulatory systolic pressure and 0.32 for comparison between brachial and central ambulatory systolic pressure). The results were consistent for men and women, and young and old participants. The areas under the curve for prediction of left ventricular hypertrophy were 0.618, 0.635, and 0.666 for brachial office, brachial, and central ambulatory systolic pressure, respectively (P=0.03 for comparison between brachial and central ambulatory systolic pressure). In younger participants, central ambulatory systolic pressure was superior to both other measurements. Central ambulatory systolic pressure, measured with an oscillometric cuff, shows a strong trend toward a closer association with left ventricular mass and hypertrophy than brachial office/ambulatory systolic pressure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01278732.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory; echocardiography; hypertrophy, left ventricular; multicenter study

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29061725     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  20 in total

Review 1.  Pulsatile arterial haemodynamics in heart failure.

Authors:  Thomas Weber; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Vascular Aging and Disease of the Small Vessels.

Authors:  Damiano Rizzoni; Marco Rizzoni; Matteo Nardin; Giulia Chiarini; Claudia Agabiti-Rosei; Carlo Aggiusti; Anna Paini; Massimo Salvetti; Maria Lorenza Muiesan
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2019-05-29

Review 3.  Ambulatory monitoring of central arterial pressure, wave reflections, and arterial stiffness in patients at cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Ayana Arystan; Bela Benczur
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 4.  The Role of Arterial Stiffness and Central Hemodynamics in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Thomas Weber
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-23

5.  Menstrual phase and the vascular response to acute resistance exercise.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Augustine; Kayla N Nunemacher; Kevin S Heffernan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  24-hour aortic blood pressure variability showed a stronger association with carotid damage than 24-hour brachial blood pressure variability: The SAFAR study.

Authors:  Shikai Yu; Chen Chi; Athanase D Protogerou; Michel E Safar; Jacques Blacher; Antonis A Argyris; Efthimia G Nasothimiou; Petros P Sfikakis; Theodore G Papaioannou; Henry Xu; Yi Zhang; Yawei Xu
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Pulsatile and steady-state 24-hour hemodynamics in adolescents and young adults: The next steps ahead.

Authors:  Thomas Weber; Athanasios D Protogerou; James E Sharman; Siegfried Wassertheurer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Evaluation of Arterial Stiffness Using Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index in Patients with Chronic Venous Insufficiency.

Authors:  Mustafa Dogdus; Onur Akhan; Mehmet Ozyasar; Ahmet Yilmaz; Mehmet Sait Altintas
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2018-12-02

9.  Insight into the 24-hour ambulatory central blood pressure in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Angeliki Ntineri; Anastasios Kollias; Maria Elena Zeniodi; Andriani Vazeou; Alexandra Soldatou; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Associations of central and peripheral blood pressure with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in healthy young adults: the African-PREDICT study.

Authors:  Lebo F Gafane-Matemane; Nametsegang L Mokae; Yolandi Breet; Marko Poglitsch; Aletta E Schutte
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.