Jacqueline A Augustine1, Kayla N Nunemacher2, Kevin S Heffernan2. 1. The Department of Exercise Science, Syracuse University, 820 Comstock Avenue, Room 202, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA. Jaimse@syr.edu. 2. The Department of Exercise Science, Syracuse University, 820 Comstock Avenue, Room 202, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Aerobic exercise has a favorable effect on systemic vascular function, reducing both central (large elastic artery) and peripheral (smaller muscular artery) stiffness. The effects of resistance exercise (RE) on arterial stiffness are more complex. Acute RE increases central artery stiffness while decreasing peripheral stiffness. To date, the majority of studies have been performed in predominantly male participants. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of acute RE on central and peripheral arterial stiffnesses in women, a secondary purpose was to explore the influence of cyclic changes in estrogen status across the menstrual cycle on the arterial response to acute RE. METHODS: 18 healthy women [28 ± 7 years, body mass index (BMI) 22.6 ± 2.9 kg/m2] completed an acute RE bout during the early follicular and the early luteal phase of their menstrual cycle. Salivary 17β-Estradiol concentration was measured during each phase, using a passive drool technique. Pulse-wave velocity (PWV) was obtained from the carotid-femoral and carotid-radial pulse sites to measure central and peripheral stiffness, respectively, using applanation tonometry. PWV was measured at rest, immediately, 10, 20, and 30 min post-RE. RESULTS: 17β-Estradiol concentration was significantly lower in the early follicular vs. the early luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (1.78 ± 0.51 vs. 2.40 ± 0.26 pg/ml, p = 0.01). Central PWV significantly increased (p < 0.05) and peripheral PWV significantly decreased (p < 0.05) post-RE in both the early follicular and early luteal phases. No phase-by-time interaction was detected for either vascular segment (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Women experience increases in central arterial stiffness and reductions in peripheral arterial stiffness following acute RE. Menstrual cycle phase may not influence changes in arterial stiffness in response to acute RE.
INTRODUCTION: Aerobic exercise has a favorable effect on systemic vascular function, reducing both central (large elastic artery) and peripheral (smaller muscular artery) stiffness. The effects of resistance exercise (RE) on arterial stiffness are more complex. Acute RE increases central artery stiffness while decreasing peripheral stiffness. To date, the majority of studies have been performed in predominantly male participants. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of acute RE on central and peripheral arterial stiffnesses in women, a secondary purpose was to explore the influence of cyclic changes in estrogen status across the menstrual cycle on the arterial response to acute RE. METHODS: 18 healthy women [28 ± 7 years, body mass index (BMI) 22.6 ± 2.9 kg/m2] completed an acute RE bout during the early follicular and the early luteal phase of their menstrual cycle. Salivary 17β-Estradiol concentration was measured during each phase, using a passive drool technique. Pulse-wave velocity (PWV) was obtained from the carotid-femoral and carotid-radial pulse sites to measure central and peripheral stiffness, respectively, using applanation tonometry. PWV was measured at rest, immediately, 10, 20, and 30 min post-RE. RESULTS: 17β-Estradiol concentration was significantly lower in the early follicular vs. the early luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (1.78 ± 0.51 vs. 2.40 ± 0.26 pg/ml, p = 0.01). Central PWV significantly increased (p < 0.05) and peripheral PWV significantly decreased (p < 0.05) post-RE in both the early follicular and early luteal phases. No phase-by-time interaction was detected for either vascular segment (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION:Women experience increases in central arterial stiffness and reductions in peripheral arterial stiffness following acute RE. Menstrual cycle phase may not influence changes in arterial stiffness in response to acute RE.
Authors: Paul D Thompson; David Buchner; Ileana L Pina; Gary J Balady; Mark A Williams; Bess H Marcus; Kathy Berra; Steven N Blair; Fernando Costa; Barry Franklin; Gerald F Fletcher; Neil F Gordon; Russell R Pate; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Antronette K Yancey; Nanette K Wenger Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Allison E DeVan; Maria M Anton; Jill N Cook; Daria B Neidre; Miriam Y Cortez-Cooper; Hirofumi Tanaka Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2005-02-17
Authors: Kevin S Heffernan; Eshan A Patvardhan; Michael Hession; Jenny Ruan; Richard H Karas; Jeffrey T Kuvin Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Miriam Y Cortez-Cooper; Allison E DeVan; Maria M Anton; Roger P Farrar; Kimberly A Beckwith; Janice S Todd; Hirofumi Tanaka Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Eun Sun Yoon; Su Jin Jung; Sung Kun Cheun; Yoo Sung Oh; Seol Hyang Kim; Sae Young Jae Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Henry Fok; Antoine Guilcher; Ye Li; Sally Brett; Ajay Shah; Brian Clapp; Phil Chowienczyk Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Samuel Palmiere; Marcus Wade; Jacob P DeBlois; Wesley K Lefferts; Kevin S Heffernan Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2018-07-28 Impact factor: 3.078