| Literature DB >> 29058615 |
Idris Njanje1, Victor P Bagla2, Brian K Beseni2, Vusi Mbazima2, Kgomotso W Lebogo2, Leseilane Mampuru2, Matlou P Mokgotho2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional drugs used to treat diabetes are too expensive, toxic and rarely available to rural communities. This study was aimed at investigating the phytochemical differences and hypoglycaemic effects (α-amylase enzyme inhibition, glucose uptake, GLUT4 translocation and phosphorylation of MAPKs) of non-defatted and defatted acetone leaf extract of Acacia karroo.Entities:
Keywords: Acacia karroo; Diabetes; Enzyme inhibition; GLUT4; Glucose uptake; MAPKs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29058615 PMCID: PMC5651630 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1987-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Qualitative phytochemical tests of A. karroo extracts
| Phenols | Flavonoids | Tannins | Terpenoids | Cardiac glycosides | carbohydrates | Steroids | Saponins | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-defatted | ++ | ++ | ++ | _ | ++ | _ | _ | ++ |
| Defatted | ++ | ++ | ++ | _ | ++ | _ | _ | + |
Total phenols, antioxidants and pancreatic α-amylase enzyme inhibition
| Phenols (TAE/mg) | DPPH scavenging activity SC50 (mg/ml) | Ferric Reducing power EC50 (mg/ml) | α-amylase enzyme inhibition IC50 (μg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-defatted | 0.449 ± 0.025 | 0.37 ± 0.027***a | 1.65 ± 0.023***a | 39.3 ± 1.715***a |
| Defatted | 0.432 ± 0.014 | 0.40 ± 0.012***a | 1.13 ± 0.017a | 30.2 ± 3.037***a |
| Ascorbic acid | _ | 0.59 ± 0.003 | 1.06 ± 0.006 | _ |
| Acarbose | _ | _ | _ | 109.8 ± 3.914 |
Data is expressed as ± SEM from averages of three to four independent repeats. Significant difference between the control and extracts and between the extracts was considered at P < 0.05. A superscript asignifies significant difference between the extracts and the asterisk significant difference between the control and extracts
Cytotoxic concentration killing 50% of cells
| Cytotoxic concentration values (CC50 μg/ml) | ||
|---|---|---|
| C2C12 Muscle cells | 3T3-L1 Adipose cells | |
| Non-defatted | 491.95 ± 2.309 | 312.74 ± 1.975 |
| Defatted | 568.09 ± 5.029 | 329.71 ± 10.0 |
Data is presented as ± SEM from three average determinations
Fig. 1Glucose uptake by C2C12 muscle (a) and 3T3-L1 adipose cells (b) following 3 h treatment with extracts of A. karroo. Insulin at 3000 mIU/ml was used as a positive control. Untreated cells and DMSO were used as standard controls. NDAK = Non-defatted extract of A. karroo, DAK = Defatted extract of A. karroo. The results are presented as ± SEM from triplicate of three independent experiments. The statistical significance of the results was tested using One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) employing the Turkey-Kramer multiple comparison test between the control and different groups and between groups. The results were considered significant at (*) P < 0.05, (**) P < 0.01 and (***) P < 0.001
Fig. 2Fluorescence intensity (a) and mean intensity (b) following 3 h of treatment with insulin (positive control), A. karroo (AK) and insulin + A. karroo (AK + I) and untreated C2C12 cells (standard control). a 1 = green fluorescence represent FITC bound GLUT4 molecules, 2 = blue represent Wuchi stained nucleus, 3 = Overlay of images 1 and 2 and 4 = intensity surface plot. All the images were taken at a magnification of 40X. b The results obtained were expressed as means ± SEM. The statistical significance of the results was tested using one way ANOVA, employing the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test. The P value significance was represented by an asterisk (*) for P < 0.05, two asterisks (**) for P < 0.01 and three asterisks (***) for P < 0.001
Fig. 3The C2C12 muscle cells were either untreated or treated with insulin (3000 mIU/ml), defatted extract of A. karroo (25 μg/ml) and a combination of the plant extract and insulin for 3 h. Data shown are from a four minute exposure to X-ray. The results obtained were expressed as means ± SEM. The statistical significance of the results was tested using one way ANOVA employing the Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test. The P value significance was represented by an asterisk (*) for P < 0.05, two asterisks (**) for P < 0.01 and three asterisks (***) for P < 0.001