Literature DB >> 29058367

CRISPR/Cas9-Based Counterselection Boosts Recombineering Efficiency in Pseudomonas putida.

Tomás Aparicio1, Víctor de Lorenzo1, Esteban Martínez-García1.   

Abstract

While adoption of single-stranded DNA recombineering techniques has greatly eased genetic design of the platform strain Pseudomonas putida KT2440, available methods still produce the desired modifications/deletions at low frequencies. This makes isolation of mutants that do not display selectable or conspicuous phenotypes considerably difficult. To overcome this limitation, the authors have merged ssDNA recombineering with CRISPR/Cas9 technology in this bacterium for efficient killing of unmodified cells and thus non-phenotypic selection of bacteria bearing the mutations of interest. After incorporating the system into standardized pSEVA plasmids the authors tested its functional efficiency by targeting different types of changes that ranged from single nucleotide substitutions to one-gene deletions-to even the removal of the large flagellar cluster (≈69 kb). Simultaneous introduction of two independent gene deletions was tested as well. In all cases, directing the crRNA/Cas9 complexes toward non-modified, wild-type genomic sequences boosted dramatically the appearance of the mutants at stake in the absence of any phenotypic selection. The results presented here upgrade the engineering possibilities of the genome of this environmental bacterium (and possibly other Gram-negatives) to obtain modifications that are otherwise cumbersome to generate.
© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; crRNA; escapers; genome engineering; spacer; ssDNA recombineering

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29058367     DOI: 10.1002/biot.201700161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1860-6768            Impact factor:   4.677


  32 in total

1.  Fatty Acid and Alcohol Metabolism in Pseudomonas putida: Functional Analysis Using Random Barcode Transposon Sequencing.

Authors:  Mitchell G Thompson; Matthew R Incha; Allison N Pearson; Matthias Schmidt; William A Sharpless; Christopher B Eiben; Pablo Cruz-Morales; Jacquelyn M Blake-Hedges; Yuzhong Liu; Catharine A Adams; Robert W Haushalter; Rohith N Krishna; Patrick Lichtner; Lars M Blank; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay; Adam M Deutschbauer; Patrick M Shih; Jay D Keasling
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Genetic tools for reliable gene expression and recombineering in Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  Taylor B Cook; Jacqueline M Rand; Wasti Nurani; Dylan K Courtney; Sophia A Liu; Brian F Pfleger
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 3.  Barriers to genome editing with CRISPR in bacteria.

Authors:  Justin M Vento; Nathan Crook; Chase L Beisel
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Streamlined CRISPR genome engineering in wild-type bacteria using SIBR-Cas.

Authors:  Constantinos Patinios; Sjoerd C A Creutzburg; Adini Q Arifah; Belén Adiego-Pérez; Evans A Gyimah; Colin J Ingham; Servé W M Kengen; John van der Oost; Raymond H J Staals
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Genome editing and transcriptional repression in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 via the type II CRISPR system.

Authors:  Jun Sun; Qingzhuo Wang; Yu Jiang; Zhiqiang Wen; Lirong Yang; Jianping Wu; Sheng Yang
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.328

6.  Characterization of Context-Dependent Effects on Synthetic Promoters.

Authors:  Sebastian Köbbing; Lars M Blank; Nick Wierckx
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-12

Review 7.  Industrial biotechnology of Pseudomonas putida: advances and prospects.

Authors:  Anna Weimer; Michael Kohlstedt; Daniel C Volke; Pablo I Nikel; Christoph Wittmann
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12a biotechnology and application in bacteria.

Authors:  Ruilian Yao; Di Liu; Xiao Jia; Yuan Zheng; Wei Liu; Yi Xiao
Journal:  Synth Syst Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-03

9.  CRISPR/Cas9-based Genome Editing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Cytidine Deaminase-Mediated Base Editing in Pseudomonas Species.

Authors:  Weizhong Chen; Ya Zhang; Yifei Zhang; Yishuang Pi; Tongnian Gu; Liqiang Song; Yu Wang; Quanjiang Ji
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-08-01

10.  Stepwise genetic engineering of Pseudomonas putida enables robust heterologous production of prodigiosin and glidobactin A.

Authors:  Taylor B Cook; Tyler B Jacobson; Maya V Venkataraman; Heike Hofstetter; Daniel Amador-Noguez; Michael G Thomas; Brian F Pfleger
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 8.829

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.