Literature DB >> 29058134

Distraction arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint: 2-year results of a descriptive prospective multi-center cohort study in 171 patients.

Volker Fuchs1, Benjamin Ruhl2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the given study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing sacroiliac joint (SIJ) distraction arthrodesis to treat SIJ-related pain.
METHODS: Descriptive prospective multi-center cohort study involving 20 hospitals in Germany. Between January 2011 and June 2012, 171 patients with chronic SIJ pain underwent indirect arthrodesis of the SIJ using a distraction implant. The patients were questioned prior to surgery, 6-weeks, and 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months postoperatively. Overall patient satisfaction was surveyed along with pain medication intake, the Million Visual Analogue Scale (MVAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a pain drawing. Bony fusion of the SIJ was evaluated using X-ray and computed tomography (CT).
RESULTS: A majority of patients (73%) reported to feel better or much better 24 months post-surgery, 49% of the patients reduced their pain medication intake. The MVAS dropped from 63 to 36%, the ODI improved from 51 to 33%, the SF-MPQ decreased from 50 to 31%, the SF-12 physical component summary rose from 22 to 41%, the mental component summary increased from 40 to 55%, and pain as measured by the VAS decreased from 74 to 37 points (all comparisons p < 0.001). In the follow-up CT scans 31% of the patients showed SIJ fusion.
CONCLUSIONS: SIJ distraction arthrodesis has shown satisfactory outcomes in patients with SIJ-related pain for all scores reported in the surveys, accompanied by increased functionality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIANA implant; Distraction interference arthrodesis with neurovascular anticipation; Pain drawing; Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis; Sacroiliac joint fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29058134     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5313-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  Age, body mass index, and gender differences in sacroiliac joint pathology.

Authors:  Robert W Irwin; Todd Watson; Ryan P Minick; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs Part 1: Biomechanics of self-bracing of the sacroiliac joints and its significance for treatment and exercise.

Authors:  C J Snijders; A Vleeming; R Stoeckart
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Test-retest reliability of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficients and limits of agreement in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kate V Grafton; Nadine E Foster; Christine C Wright
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Recognizing specific characteristics of nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  T N Bernard; W H Kirkaldy-Willis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variants on CT.

Authors:  P K Prassopoulos; C P Faflia; A E Voloudaki; N C Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.

Authors:  Bengt Sturesson; Djaya Kools; Robert Pflugmacher; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Domenico Prestamburgo; Julius Dengler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Does a pelvic belt influence sacroiliac joint laxity?

Authors:  Léonie Damen; Cornelis W Spoor; Chris J Snijders; Henk J Stam
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Sacroiliac joint: pain referral maps upon applying a new injection/arthrography technique. Part II: Clinical evaluation.

Authors:  J D Fortin; C N Aprill; B Ponthieux; J Pier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Referred pain location depends on the affected section of the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Daisuke Kurosawa; Eiichi Murakami; Toshimi Aizawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  9 in total

1.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 2.  The efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aazad Abbas; Jin Tong Du; Jay Toor; Anne Versteeg; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Lucas Haase; Paul A Lender; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-10

4.  Three-Year Clinical Outcomes after Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis Using Triangular Implants in Japan: A Pilot Study of Five Cases.

Authors:  Daisuke Kurosawa; Eiichi Murakami; Hiroaki Koga; Hiroshi Ozawa
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 5.  Best Practices for Postoperative Management of Posterior Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Authors:  Patrick Buchanan; David W Lee; Ashley Comer; Zohra Hussaini; Casey Grillo; Shashank Vodapally; Natalie H Strand; Dawood Sayed; Timothy R Deer
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.832

6.  Revision of Failed Sacroiliac Joint Posterior Interpositional Structural Allograft Stabilization with Lateral Porous Titanium Implants: A Multicenter Case Series.

Authors:  Andy Kranenburg; Gabriel Garcia-Diaz; Judson H Cook; Michael Thambuswamy; Whitney James; David Stevens; Adam Bruggeman; Ying Chen; Robyn Capobianco; W Carlton Reckling; Joel D Siegal
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-07-20

7.  Surgical Outcomes of Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Pain: An Analysis of Patients with Poor Results Regarding Activities of Daily Living.

Authors:  Daisuke Kurosawa; Eiichi Murakami; Toshimi Aizawa; Takashi Watanabe
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-21

8.  Pitfalls during Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis for Patients with Severe Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Report of Three Cases with Sacral Dysmorphism Induced by Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae.

Authors:  Daisuke Kurosawa; Eiichi Murakami; Toshimi Aizawa; Takashi Watanabe; Hiroshi Ozawa
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2019

9.  The effect of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion compared with sham operation: study protocol of a prospective double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Engelke Marie Randers; Paul Gerdhem; Jon Dahl; Britt Stuge; Thomas Johan Kibsgård
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.