Literature DB >> 29057562

Complications of the neovagina in male-to-female transgender surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with discussion of management.

Paulette Cutruzzula Dreher1, Daniel Edwards1, Shaun Hager1, Margeaux Dennis2, Andie Belkoff3, Jamie Mora4, Susan Tarry1, Kathy L Rumer4.   

Abstract

Gender-affirmation surgery is often the final gender-confirming medical intervention sought by those patients suffering from gender dysphoria. In the male-to-female (MtF) transgendered patient, the creation of esthetic and functional external female genitalia with a functional vaginal channel is of the utmost importance. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the epidemiology, presentation, management, and outcomes of neovaginal complications in the MtF transgender reassignment surgery patients. PUBMED was searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for relevant articles (n = 125). Ineligible articles were excluded and articles meeting all inclusion criteria went on to review and analysis (n = 13). Ultimately, studies reported on 1,684 patients with an overall complication rate of 32.5% and a reoperation rate of 21.7% for non-esthetic reasons. The most common complication was stenosis of the neo-meatus (14.4%). Wound infection was associated with an increased risk of all tissue-healing complications. Use of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSL) was associated with a significantly decreased risk of prolapse of the neovagina. Gender-affirmation surgery is important in the treatment of gender dysphoric patients, but there is a high complication rate in the reported literature. Variability in technique and complication reporting standards makes it difficult to assess the accurately the current state of MtF gender reassignment surgery. Further research and implementation of standards is necessary to improve patient outcomes. Clin. Anat. 31:191-199, 2018.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prolapse; reoperation; risk; sex reassignment surgery; transgender person; vagina

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29057562     DOI: 10.1002/ca.23001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  5 in total

1.  Repair of colonic neovaginal stenosis using a biological graft in a male-to-female transgender patient.

Authors:  Ankita Gupta; Sean Francis; Ryan Stewart; Deslyn Hobson; Kate V Meriwether
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Penile Flap Inversion Vaginoplasty in Transgender Women: Contemporary Morbidity and Learning-Curve Analysis From a High-Volume Reconstructive Center.

Authors:  Valentin Maurer; Marian Howaldt; Inga Feldmann; Tim Ludwig; Malte W Vetterlein; Philipp Gild; Sylvia Weis; Phillip Marks; Armin Soave; Christian P Meyer; Margit Fisch; Roland Dahlem; Silke Riechardt
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 3.  The Effect of Gender-Affirming Medical Care on the Vaginal and Neovaginal Microbiomes of Transgender and Gender-Diverse People.

Authors:  Yonah Krakowsky; Emery Potter; Jason Hallarn; Bern Monari; Hannah Wilcox; Greta Bauer; Jacques Ravel; Jessica L Prodger
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.293

4.  The neovaginal microbiome of transgender women post-gender reassignment surgery.

Authors:  Kenzie D Birse; Kateryna Kratzer; Christina Farr Zuend; Sarah Mutch; Laura Noël-Romas; Alana Lamont; Max Abou; Emilia Jalil; Valdiléa Veloso; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Ruth Khalili Friedman; Kristina Broliden; Frideborg Bradley; Vanessa Poliquin; Fan Li; Carolyn Yanavich; Adam Burgener; Grace Aldrovandi
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 5.  Scaffold strategies combined with mesenchymal stem cells in vaginal construction: a review.

Authors:  Nicole Andréa Corbellini Henckes; Dalana Faleiro; Laura Chao Chuang; Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima
Journal:  Cell Regen       Date:  2021-08-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.