Literature DB >> 29056400

Social Media Utilization at an Academic Radiology Practice.

Nicholas A Koontz1, Aaron P Kamer2, Sean C Dodson2, Alisha E Capps2, Courtney M Tomblinson3, Brandon P Brown2, Mark S Frank2, Darel E Heitkamp2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: We report social media (SoMe) utilization trends at an academic radiology department, highlighting differences between trainees and faculty and between Baby Boomers versus Generation X and Millennials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous online survey regarding SoMe utilization and SoMe-based educational curriculum was distributed to all radiologists (trainees and faculty) in our department. Regular chi-square, ordered (Mantel-Haenszel) chi-square, and Fischer exact tests were performed.
RESULTS: The survey instrument was sent to 172 radiologists with a 65% completion rate (N = 112). Eighty-three percent (n = 92) of the respondents use SoMe, with Facebook (67%, n = 75), YouTube (57%, n = 64), Instagram (26%, n = 29), and Twitter (21%, n = 23) as the most commonly used platforms. Eighty-one percent (n = 91) use SoMe for 30 minutes or less per day. Thirty-five percent (n = 39) reported previously using SoMe for educational purposes, although 66% (n = 73) would be willing to join SoMe for educational activities. The faculty are more likely than trainees to avoid using SoMe (30% vs 9%, P < 0.03). Trainees are more likely than faculty to find an electronic case-based curriculum valuable (95% vs 83%, P < 0.05) and are willing to spend more time on cases (P < 0.01). Baby Boomers are less interested in joining SoMe for educational activities than Generation X and Millennials (24% vs 73%, P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Generation gaps between trainees and faculty, as well as between Generation X and Millennials versus Baby Boomers, exist with regard to the use of SoMe, which may be underutilized in radiology education.
Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  SoMe; Social media; generation gap; radiology education; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29056400     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  8 in total

1.  Harnessing the Power of Medical Twitter for Mentorship.

Authors:  Morgan N McLuckey; Jessica A Gold; Avital Y O'Glasser; Susan Hingle; Abby Spencer; Laurel B Fick
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-10

2.  Publicly Available Metrics Underestimate AJNR Twitter Impact and Follower Engagement.

Authors:  C M Tomblinson; V Wadhwa; E Latimer; C H Gauss; J L McCarty
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Radiology, Mobile Devices, and Internet of Things (IoT).

Authors:  Supriya Gupta; Elizabeth M Johnson; Justin G Peacock; Liwei Jiang; Morgan P McBee; Michael B Sneider; Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Is a Picture Really Worth More than a Thousand Words? Which Instagram Post Types Elicit the Best Response for Radiology Education.

Authors:  Lilly Kauffman; Edmund M Weisberg; John Eng; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Using Facebook Live to Advocate Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Hilda H Tso; Jay R Parikh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) social media committee workgroup: best practices for the use of social media in emergency radiology.

Authors:  Waleed Abdellatif; Jeffrey Ding; Yael Porto Silva; Ali Tejani; Christina LeBedis
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2022-09-12

7.  Are We Witnessing a Paradigm Shift?: A Systematic Review of Social Media in Residency.

Authors:  James M Economides; Youna K Choi; Kenneth L Fan; Arjun P Kanuri; David H Song
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-19

8.  Twitter Use by Academic Nuclear Medicine Programs: Pilot Content Analysis Study.

Authors:  Ananya Panda; Akash Sharma; Ayca Dundar; Ann Packard; Lee Aase; Amy Kotsenas; Ayse Tuba Kendi
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-11-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.