Literature DB >> 29055159

Genomics of natural populations: Evolutionary forces that establish and maintain gene arrangements in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Zachary L Fuller1, Gwilym D Haynes1, Stephen Richards2, Stephen W Schaeffer1.   

Abstract

The evolution of complex traits in heterogeneous environments may shape the order of genes within chromosomes. Drosophila pseudoobscura has a rich gene arrangement polymorphism that allows one to test evolutionary genetic hypotheses about how chromosomal inversions are established in populations. D. pseudoobscura has >30 gene arrangements on a single chromosome that were generated through a series of overlapping inversion mutations with >10 inversions with appreciable frequencies and wide geographic distributions. This study analyses the genomic sequences of 54 strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura that carry one of six different chromosomal arrangements to test whether (i) genetic drift, (ii) hitchhiking with an adaptive allele, (iii) direct effects of inversions to create gene disruptions caused by breakpoints, or (iv) indirect effects of inversions in limiting the formation of recombinant gametes are responsible for the establishment of new gene arrangements. We found that the inversion events do not disrupt the structure of protein coding genes at the breakpoints. Population genetic analyses of 2,669 protein coding genes identified 277 outlier loci harbouring elevated frequencies of arrangement-specific derived alleles. Significant linkage disequilibrium occurs among distant loci interspersed between regions with low levels of association indicating that distant allelic combinations are held together despite shared polymorphism among arrangements. Outlier genes showing evidence of genetic differentiation between arrangements are enriched for sensory perception and detoxification genes. The data presented here support the indirect effect of inversion hypothesis where chromosomal inversions are favoured because they maintain linked associations among multilocus allelic combinations among different arrangements.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; chromosomal inversions; linkage disequilibrium; population genomics; recombination

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29055159     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  13 in total

1.  Eight million years of maintained heterozygosity in chromosome homologs of cercopithecine monkeys.

Authors:  Doron Tolomeo; Oronzo Capozzi; Giorgia Chiatante; Luca Sineo; Takafumi Ishida; Nicoletta Archidiacono; Mariano Rocchi; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dynisty Wright; Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  The Cyclically Seasonal Drosophila subobscura Inversion O7 Originated From Fragile Genomic Sites and Relocated Immunity and Metabolic Genes.

Authors:  Charikleia Karageorgiou; Rosa Tarrío; Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Inversion evolutionary rates might limit the experimental identification of inversion breakpoints in non-model species.

Authors:  Eva Puerma; Dorcas J Orengo; Montserrat Aguadé
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Fine-Scale Position Effects Shape the Distribution of Inversion Breakpoints in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jakob McBroome; David Liang; Russell Corbett-Detig
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Consequences of Single-Locus and Tightly Linked Genomic Architectures for Evolutionary Responses to Environmental Change.

Authors:  Rebekah A Oomen; Anna Kuparinen; Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Ancestral polymorphisms explain the role of chromosomal inversions in speciation.

Authors:  Zachary L Fuller; Christopher J Leonard; Randee E Young; Stephen W Schaeffer; Nitin Phadnis
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Extensive Recombination Suppression and Epistatic Selection Causes Chromosome-Wide Differentiation of a Selfish Sex Chromosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Zachary L Fuller; Spencer A Koury; Christopher J Leonard; Randee E Young; Kobe Ikegami; Jonathan Westlake; Stephen Richards; Stephen W Schaeffer; Nitin Phadnis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Origin and Consequences of Chromosomal Inversions in the virilis Group of Drosophila.

Authors:  Micael Reis; Cristina P Vieira; Rodrigo Lata; Nico Posnien; Jorge Vieira
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Muller "Elements" in Drosophila: How the Search for the Genetic Basis for Speciation Led to the Birth of Comparative Genomics.

Authors:  Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.