Literature DB >> 29055050

An evolutionary framework outlining the integration of individual social and spatial ecology.

Quinn M R Webber1, Eric Vander Wal1,2.   

Abstract

Behaviour is the interface between an organism and its environment, and behavioural plasticity is important for organisms to cope with environmental change. Social behaviour is particularly important because sociality is a dynamic process, where environmental variation influences group dynamics and social plasticity can mediate resource acquisition. Heterogeneity in the ecological environment can therefore influence the social environment. The combination of the ecological and social environments may be interpreted collectively as the "socioecological environment," which could explain variation in fitness. Our objective was to outline a framework through which individual social and spatial phenotypes can be integrated and interpreted as phenotypes that covary as a function of changes in the socioecological environment. We propose the socioecological environment is composed of individual behavioural traits, including sociality and habitat selection, both of which are repeatable, potentially heritable and may reflect animal personality traits. We also highlight how ecological and social niche theory can be applied to the socioecological environment framework, where individuals occupy different socioecological niches. Individual sociality and habitat selection are also density-dependent, and theory predicts that density-dependent traits should affect reproduction, survival, and therefore fitness and population dynamics. We then illustrate the proximate links between sociality, habitat selection and fitness as well as the ultimate, and possibly adaptive, consequences associated with changes in population density. The ecological, evolutionary and applied implications of our proposed socioecological environment framework are broad and changes in density could influence individual fitness and population dynamics. For instance, human-induced environmental changes can influence population density, which can affect the distribution of social and spatial phenotypes within a population. In summary, we outline a conceptual framework that incorporates individual social and spatial behavioural traits with fitness and we highlight a range of ecological and evolutionary processes that are likely associated with the socioecological environment.
© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive landscape; animal personality; ecological niche; indirect genetic effects; isodar analysis; quantitative genetics; resource selection function; social network analysis; social niche specialization; socioecological environment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29055050     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  10 in total

1.  Ageing red deer alter their spatial behaviour and become less social.

Authors:  Gregory F Albery; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Alison Morris; Sean Morris; Josephine M Pemberton; Daniel H Nussey; Josh A Firth
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 19.100

2.  Environmental and anthropogenic influences on movement and foraging in a critically endangered lemur species, Propithecus tattersalli: implications for habitat conservation planning.

Authors:  Meredith A Semel; Heather N Abernathy; Brandon P Semel; Michael J Cherry; Tsioriniaina J C Ratovoson; Ignacio T Moore
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.253

3.  Negative density-dependent parasitism in a group-living carnivore.

Authors:  Gregory F Albery; Chris Newman; Julius Bright Ross; David W MacDonald; Shweta Bansal; Christina Buesching
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Consistent individual differences and population plasticity in network-derived sociality: An experimental manipulation of density in a gregarious ungulate.

Authors:  Paul P O'Brien; Quinn M R Webber; Eric Vander Wal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ecological correlates of blue whale movement behavior and its predictability in the California Current Ecosystem during the summer-fall feeding season.

Authors:  Daniel M Palacios; Helen Bailey; Elizabeth A Becker; Steven J Bograd; Monica L DeAngelis; Karin A Forney; Elliott L Hazen; Ladd M Irvine; Bruce R Mate
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.600

6.  "Micropersonality" traits and their implications for behavioral and movement ecology research.

Authors:  Joseph D Bailey; Andrew J King; Edward A Codling; Ashley M Short; Gemma I Johns; Ines Fürtbauer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Social networks and the conservation of fish.

Authors:  David Villegas-Ríos; David M P Jacoby; Johann Mourier
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-02-28

8.  Permutation tests for hypothesis testing with animal social network data: Problems and potential solutions.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Gerald G Carter
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 8.335

9.  The movements of a recently urbanized wading bird reveal changes in season timing and length related to resource use.

Authors:  Anjelika Kidd-Weaver; Jeffrey Hepinstall-Cymerman; Catharine N Welch; Maureen H Murray; Henry C Adams; Taylor J Ellison; Michael J Yabsley; Sonia M Hernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Decrease in social cohesion in a colonial seabird under a perturbation regime.

Authors:  M Genovart; O Gimenez; A Bertolero; R Choquet; D Oro; R Pradel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.