Literature DB >> 33323092

Negative density-dependent parasitism in a group-living carnivore.

Gregory F Albery1, Chris Newman2, Julius Bright Ross2, David W MacDonald2, Shweta Bansal1, Christina Buesching2,3.   

Abstract

Animals living at high population densities commonly experience greater exposure to disease, leading to increased parasite burdens. However, social animals can benefit immunologically and hygienically from cooperation, and individuals may alter their socio-spatial behaviour in response to infection, both of which could counteract density-related increases in exposure. Consequently, the costs and benefits of sociality for disease are often uncertain. Here, we use a long-term study of a wild European badger population (Meles meles) to investigate how within-population variation in host density determines infection with multiple parasites. Four out of five parasite taxa exhibited consistent spatial hotspots of infection, which peaked among badgers living in areas of low local population density. Combined movement, survival, spatial and social network analyses revealed that parasite avoidance was the likely cause of this negative density dependence, with possible roles for localized mortality, encounter-dilution effects, and micronutrient-enhanced immunity. These findings demonstrate that animals can organize their societies in space to minimize parasite infection, with important implications for badger behavioural ecology and for the control of badger-associated diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  density dependence; disease ecology; parasite avoidance; parasites; wild mammal

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33323092      PMCID: PMC7779509          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  46 in total

1.  Spatial perturbation caused by a badger (Meles meles) culling operation: implications for the function of territoriality and the control of bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis).

Authors:  F A M Tuyttens; R J Delahay; D W Macdonald; C L Cheeseman; B Long; C A Donnelly
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Linking social and pathogen transmission networks using microbial genetics in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis).

Authors:  Kimberly L VanderWaal; Edward R Atwill; Lynne A Isbell; Brenda McCowan
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Infection-avoidance behaviour in humans and other animals.

Authors:  Valerie A Curtis
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 16.687

4.  Coccidiosis in the European badger, Meles meles in Wytham Woods: infection and consequences for growth and survival.

Authors:  C Newman; D W Macdonald; M A Anwar
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  Impacts of widespread badger culling on cattle tuberculosis: concluding analyses from a large-scale field trial.

Authors:  Christl A Donnelly; Gao Wei; W Thomas Johnston; D R Cox; Rosie Woodroffe; F John Bourne; C L Cheeseman; Richard S Clifton-Hadley; George Gettinby; Peter Gilks; Helen E Jenkins; Andrea M Le Fevre; John P McInerney; W Ivan Morrison
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Helminth-microparasite co-infection in wildlife: lessons from ruminants, rodents and rabbits.

Authors:  V O Ezenwa
Journal:  Parasite Immunol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.280

7.  Macroimmunology: The drivers and consequences of spatial patterns in wildlife immune defence.

Authors:  Daniel J Becker; Gregory F Albery; Maureen K Kessler; Tamika J Lunn; Caylee A Falvo; Gábor Á Czirják; Lynn B Martin; Raina K Plowright
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-01-26       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Badgers prefer cattle pasture but avoid cattle: implications for bovine tuberculosis control.

Authors:  Rosie Woodroffe; Christl A Donnelly; Cally Ham; Seth Y B Jackson; Kelly Moyes; Kayna Chapman; Naomi G Stratton; Samantha J Cartwright
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Social structure contains epidemics and regulates individual roles in disease transmission in a group-living mammal.

Authors:  Carly Rozins; Matthew J Silk; Darren P Croft; Richard J Delahay; Dave J Hodgson; Robbie A McDonald; Nicola Weber; Mike Boots
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Spatial networks differ when food supply changes: Foraging strategy of Egyptian fruit bats.

Authors:  Erik Bachorec; Ivan Horáček; Pavel Hulva; Adam Konečný; Radek K Lučan; Petr Jedlička; Wael M Shohdi; Šimon Řeřucha; Mounir Abi-Said; Tomáš Bartonička
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Crowding does not affect monarch butterflies' resistance to a protozoan parasite.

Authors:  Wajd Alaidrous; Scott M Villa; Jacobus C de Roode; Ania A Majewska
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Patterns of Genital Tract Mustelid Gammaherpesvirus 1 (Musghv-1) Reactivation Are Linked to Stressors in European Badgers (Meles Meles).

Authors:  Ming-Shan Tsai; Sarah François; Chris Newman; David W Macdonald; Christina D Buesching
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-11

3.  How Does the Social Grouping of Animals in Nature Protect Against Sickness? A Perspective.

Authors:  Lynette A Hart; Benjamin L Hart
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.558

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.