Literature DB >> 29054379

Treatment log files as a tool to identify treatment plan sensitivity to inaccuracies in scanned proton beam delivery.

Maria Francesca Belosi1, Robert van der Meer2, Paz Garcia de Acilu Laa3, Alessandra Bolsi2, Damien C Weber4, Antony J Lomax5.   

Abstract

Dose distributions delivered at Gantry 2 at the Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI) can be reconstructed on the patient anatomy based on machine log files. With the present work, the dependency of the log file calculation on the planning optimization technique and on other planning parameters, such as field direction and tumour size, has been investigated. Interestingly, and despite the typically higher modulation of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) plans, the results for both Single Field Uniform Distribution and IMPT approaches have been found to be similar. In addition, complex fields with steep in-field dose gradients, such as Simultaneous Integrated Boost, and with couch movements in between the delivery, also resulted in good agreement between planned and reconstructed doses. Nevertheless, highly modulated plans can have regions of larger local dose deviations and attention should therefore be paid during the planning stage to the location of isolated, highly weighted pencil beams. We propose also, that further effort should be invested in order to predict field robustness to delivery fluctuations before the clinical delivery of the plan as part of the plan specific Quality Assurance.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delivery accuracy; Dose reconstruction; Log files; Plan modulation; Proton pencil beam scanning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29054379     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

Review 1.  Online daily adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Francesca Albertini; Michael Matter; Lena Nenoff; Ye Zhang; Antony Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Daniel O'Connor; Dan Ruan; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Automation of routine elements for spot-scanning proton patient-specific quality assurance.

Authors:  Danairis Hernandez Morales; Jie Shan; Wei Liu; Kurt E Augustine; Martin Bues; Michael J Davis; Mirek Fatyga; Jedediah E Johnson; Daniel W Mundy; Jiajian Shen; James E Younkin; Joshua B Stoker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dosimetric impact of random spot positioning errors in intensity modulated proton therapy plans of small and large volume tumors.

Authors:  Manikandan Arjunan; Ganapathy Krishnan; Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma; Noufal M P; Kartikeshwar C Patro; Rajesh Thiyagarajan; Chilukuri Srinivas; Rakesh Jalali
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Highly efficient and sensitive patient-specific quality assurance for spot-scanned proton therapy.

Authors:  J E Johnson; C Beltran; H Wan Chan Tseung; D W Mundy; J J Kruse; T J Whitaker; M G Herman; K M Furutani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.