Literature DB >> 29053335

Success rates of a skeletal anchorage system in orthodontics: A retrospective analysis.

Raymond Lam, Mithran S Goonewardene, Brent P Allan, Junji Sugawara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the premise that skeletal anchorage with SAS miniplates are highly successful and predictable for a range of complex orthodontic movements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional analysis consisted of 421 bone plates placed by one clinician in 163 patients (95 female, 68 male, mean age 29.4 years ± 12.02). Simple descriptive statistics were performed for a wide range of malocclusions and desired movements to obtain success, complication, and failure rates.
RESULTS: The success rate of skeletal anchorage system miniplates was 98.6%, where approximately 40% of cases experienced mild complications. The most common complication was soft tissue inflammation, which was amenable to focused oral hygiene and antiseptic rinses. Infection occurred in approximately 15% of patients where there was a statistically significant correlation with poor oral hygiene. The most common movements were distalization and intrusion of teeth. More than a third of the cases involved complex movements in more than one plane of space.
CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of skeletal anchorage system miniplates is high and predictable for a wide range of complex orthodontic movements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone plate; Miniplate; Orthodontic anchorage; Skeletal anchorage

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29053335     DOI: 10.2319/060617-375.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  6 in total

1.  Analysis for Predictors of Failure of Orthodontic Mini-implant Using Patient-Specific Finite Element Models.

Authors:  Takahiro Toriya; Toru Kitahara; Hiroto Hyakutake; Mitsugu Todo; Ichiro Takahashi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Intrusion of posterior teeth using miniplates: intrusive mechanics is not the same as intrusion force.

Authors:  Suzana T M P M Apolinário; Aparecida Fernanda Meloti; Ertty Silva; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso; Alberto Consolaro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2021-10-25

Review 3.  A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Daniel Jaramillo-Bedoya; Gustavo Villegas-Giraldo; Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez; Diana Milena Ramírez-Ossa
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Can maxilla and mandible bone quality explain differences in orthodontic mini-implant failures?

Authors:  Omar Melendres Ugarte; Ivan Onone Gialain; Naor Maldonado de Carvalho; Gisele Lie Fukuoka; Rafael Yague Ballester; Paolo Maria Cattaneo; Marina Guimarães Roscoe; Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 5.  Extra-Alveolar Bone Screws for Conservative Correction of Severe Malocclusion Without Extractions or Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Chris C H Chang; Joshua S Y Lin; H Y Yeh
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Assessing Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of New Approaches to Planning and Integrated Implementation of Full-Mouth Reconstruction.

Authors:  Fatima Dzalaeva; Sergey Chikunov; Anatoly Utyuzh; Maria Mikhailova; Marzhanat Budunova
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-09-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.