Spencer J Hayes1, Matthew Andrew1, Nathan C Foster1, Digby Elliott2, Emma Gowen3, Simon J Bennett1. 1. Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. 2. Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 3. Faculty of Life Sciences, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Humans show an astonishing capability to learn sensorimotor behaviours. However, data from sensorimotor learning experiments suggest the integration of efferent sensorimotor commands, afferent sensorimotor information, and visual consequences of a performed action during learning is different in autism, leading to atypical representation of internal action models. Here, we investigated the generalization of a sensorimotor internal action model formed during sensorimotor learning to a different, but associated, visual perception task. Although motor timing was generally less accurate in adults with autism, following practice with feedback both autistic adults, and controls, significantly improved performance of the movement sequence timing task by reducing timing error. In a subsequent perception task, both groups demonstrated similar temporal-discrimination accuracy (autism = 75%; control = 76%). Significant correlations between motor timing error, and temporal-discrimination during a perception task, was found for controls. No significant correlations were found for autistic adults. Our findings indicate that autistic adults demonstrated adaptation by reducing motor timing error through sensorimotor learning. However, the finding of significant correlations between motor timing error and temporal-discrimination accuracy in the control group only suggests sensorimotor processes underpinning internal action model formation operate differently in autism. Autism Res 2018, 11: 296-304.
Humans show an astonishing capability to learn sensorimotor behaviours. However, data from sensorimotor learning experiments suggest the integration of efferent sensorimotor commands, afferent sensorimotor information, and visual consequences of a performed action during learning is different in autism, leading to atypical representation of internal action models. Here, we investigated the generalization of a sensorimotor internal action model formed during sensorimotor learning to a different, but associated, visual perception task. Although motor timing was generally less accurate in adults with autism, following practice with feedback both autistic adults, and controls, significantly improved performance of the movement sequence timing task by reducing timing error. In a subsequent perception task, both groups demonstrated similar temporal-discrimination accuracy (autism = 75%; control = 76%). Significant correlations between motor timing error, and temporal-discrimination during a perception task, was found for controls. No significant correlations were found for autistic adults. Our findings indicate that autistic adults demonstrated adaptation by reducing motor timing error through sensorimotor learning. However, the finding of significant correlations between motor timing error and temporal-discrimination accuracy in the control group only suggests sensorimotor processes underpinning internal action model formation operate differently in autism. Autism Res 2018, 11: 296-304.
Authors: Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Jennifer Segawa; F Isik Karahanoglu; Catherine Tocci; Jason A Tourville; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Helen Tager-Flusberg; Dara S Manoach; Frank H Guenther Journal: Res Autism Spectr Disord Date: 2022-04-07
Authors: Yu Wei Chua; Szu-Ching Lu; Anna Anzulewicz; Krzystof Sobota; Christos Tachtatzis; Ivan Andonovic; Philip Rowe; Jonathan Delafield-Butt Journal: Dev Sci Date: 2021-12-06