| Literature DB >> 29051865 |
Jia Jia1, Hong Wang2, Zhuole Lu3, Paul G O'Brien4, Mireille Ghoussoub2, Paul Duchesne5, Ziqi Zheng2, Peicheng Li1, Qiao Qiao6,7, Lu Wang2, Alan Gu3, Abdinoor A Jelle2, Yuchan Dong2, Qiang Wang8, Kulbir Kaur Ghuman1, Thomas Wood3, Chenxi Qian2, Yue Shao2, Chenyue Qiu1, Miaomiao Ye9, Yimei Zhu6, Zheng-Hong Lu1, Peng Zhang5, Amr S Helmy10, Chandra Veer Singh1, Nazir P Kherani1,10, Doug D Perovic1, Geoffrey A Ozin2.
Abstract
This study has designed and implemented a library of hetero-nanostructured catalysts, denoted as Pd@Nb2O5, comprised of size-controlled Pd nanocrystals interfaced with Nb2O5 nanorods. This study also demonstrates that the catalytic activity and selectivity of CO2 reduction to CO and CH4 products can be systematically tailored by varying the size of the Pd nanocrystals supported on the Nb2O5 nanorods. Using large Pd nanocrystals, this study achieves CO and CH4 production rates as high as 0.75 and 0.11 mol h-1 gPd-1, respectively. By contrast, using small Pd nanocrystals, a CO production rate surpassing 18.8 mol h-1 gPd-1 is observed with 99.5% CO selectivity. These performance metrics establish a new milestone in the champion league of catalytic nanomaterials that can enable solar-powered gas-phase heterogeneous CO2 reduction. The remarkable control over the catalytic performance of Pd@Nb2O5 is demonstrated to stem from a combination of photothermal, electronic and size effects, which is rationally tunable through nanochemistry.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 conversion; photothermal catalysts; size effects; tunable selectivity
Year: 2017 PMID: 29051865 PMCID: PMC5644230 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201700252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the growth of Pd nanocrystals on Nb2O5 nanorods: a) low loading of the Pd precursor and b) high loading of the Pd precursor.
Figure 2Morphology and structural analysis of Pd@Nb2O5 samples. Bright field TEM images of a) 0.1% Pd@Nb2O5 sample; b) 3% Pd@Nb2O5 sample; and c) 10% Pd@Nb2O5 sample; scale bar: 20 nm. HRTEM image of d) 0.1% Pd@Nb2O5 sample; e) 3% Pd@Nb2O5 sample; and f) 10% Pd@Nb2O5 sample; scale bar: 2 nm. g) Pd K‐edge XANES spectra from the supported Pd nanocrystals. h) Pd K‐edge FT‐EXAFS spectra from the supported Pd nanocrystals.
Figure 3Optical and Raman characterization of Pd@Nb2O5 samples. a) Digital photographs of pristine Nb2O5 and Pd@Nb2O5 samples with different loadings of Pd. b) Diffuse reflectance spectra of pristine Nb2O5 and different Pd@Nb2O5 samples dispersed on borosilicate filter films. Dependence of the Raman frequency for νNb=O stretching vibrations of c) 0.1% Pd@Nb2O5, d) 0.5% Pd@Nb2O5, and e) 5% Pd@Nb2O5 at different incident light power levels. f) The estimated temperatures of 0.1%, 0.5%, and 5% Pd loaded onto Nb2O5 nanorods at different incient light power levels.
Figure 4Photothermal catalytic performance of Pd@Nb2O5 samples. a) CO production rates over Pd@Nb2O5 film samples with different Pd loadings under irradiation from a 300 W Xe lamp. b) CH4 selectivities over Pd@Nb2O5 film samples with different Pd loadings. c) CH4 selectivities over 10% Pd@Nb2O5 with different sample weights. d) Comparison of TOFPd methane and TOFPd CO for 3% Pd@Nb2O5 and 10% Pd@Nb2O5 in a batch photoreactor under 4.2 W cm−2 and for 10% Pd@Nb2O5 in flow photoreactor under 2.1 W cm−2.
Figure 5XPS, UPS, and in situ DRIFT analysis: a) Pd 3d5/2 binding energy position as a function of Pd loading. b) The Fermi‐level position of pristine Nb2O5 in comparison with that of 0.1% Pd@Nb2O5 and 10% Pd@Nb2O5 measured by UPS (Fermi levels are referenced to the vacuum level, i.e., the materials' work functions). c,d) In situ DRIFT spectra of 0.1% Pd@Nb2O5 under a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (1:1 ratio) at 240 °C. e,f) In situ DRIFT spectra of 10% Pd@Nb2O5 under a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (1:1 ratio) at 240 °C.
Figure 6Density functional theory analysis and reaction mechanism on low Pd loading and high Pd loading samples. a) Pd(111), stepped Pd(211), and Pd55 computational models for representing surface terrace sites, edge and corner sites. b) Calculated free energy diagram for *CO intermediate reduction to CH4 on Pd(111), Pd(211), and Pd55. c) Calculated activation barrier for the rate‐determine step on Pd(111), Pd(211), and Pd55. d) Schematic illustration depicts the weak CO bonding of small Pd nanocrystals in low Pd loading sample, leading to mainly CO production. e) Schematic illustration depicts the strong CO bonding of large Pd nanocrystals in the high Pd loading sample, leading to CH4 production.