Literature DB >> 29050528

UV-Assisted 3D Bioprinting of Nanoreinforced Hybrid Cardiac Patch for Myocardial Tissue Engineering.

Mohammad Izadifar1,2,3,4, Dean Chapman3,5,6, Paul Babyn3,6, Xiongbiao Chen2,3, Michael E Kelly1,3.   

Abstract

Biofabrication of cell supportive cardiac patches that can be directly implanted on myocardial infarct is a potential solution for myocardial infarction repair. Ideally, cardiac patches should be able to mimic myocardium extracellular matrix for rapid integration with the host tissue, raising the need to develop cardiac constructs with complex features. In particular, cardiac patches should be electrically conductive, mechanically robust and elastic, biologically active and prevascularized. In this study, we aim to biofabricate a nanoreinforced hybrid cardiac patch laden with human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) with improved electrical, mechanical, and biological behavior. A safe ultraviolet (UV) exposure time with insignificant effect on cell viability was identified for methacrylated collagen (MeCol) micropatterning. The effects of carboxyl functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on MeCol and alginate matrix morphology, mechanical properties, electrical behavior, and cellular response were investigated at different CNT mass ratios. A UV-integrated 3D-bioprinting technique was implemented to create hybrid hydrogel constructs consisting of CNT-incorporated alginate framework and cell-laden MeCol. The compressive modulus, impedance, and swelling degree of hybrid constructs were assessed over 20 days of incubation in culture medium at 37°C for different CNT mass ratios. The HCAEC viability, proliferation, and differentiation in the context of the bioprinted hybrid constructs were assessed over 10 days in vitro. The functionalized CNTs provided a highly interconnected nanofibrous meshwork that significantly improved viscoelastic behavior and electrical conductivity of photo-cross-linked MeCol. Alginate-coated CNTs provided a nanofilamentous network with fiber size of ∼25-500 nm, improving not only electrical and mechanical properties but also HCAEC attachment and elongation compared to pristine alginate. The CNT-reinforced 3D-printed hybrid constructs presented significantly higher stiffness and electrical conductivity particularly in the physiologically relevant frequency range (∼5 Hz). The CNT-reinforced hybrid implants maintained a significantly higher swelling degree over 20 days of culturing compared to CNT-free hybrid constructs. For a selected CNT mass ratio, HCAECs presented significant cellular proliferation, migration, and differentiation (lumen-like formation) over 10 days of incubation in vitro. Findings from this study deliver essential steps toward developing conductive, robust, and potentially prevascularized hybrid cardiac patches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing; bioprinting; cardiac patch; cardiac tissue engineering; hybrid scaffold; hydrogel; nanotubes; photo-cross-linking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29050528     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  32 in total

1.  Engineering a naturally-derived adhesive and conductive cardiopatch.

Authors:  Brian W Walker; Roberto Portillo Lara; Chu Hsiang Yu; Ehsan Shirzaei Sani; William Kimball; Shannon Joyce; Nasim Annabi
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Engineering Functional Cardiac Tissues for Regenerative Medicine Applications.

Authors:  Martin L Tomov; Carmen J Gil; Alexander Cetnar; Andrea S Theus; Bryanna J Lima; Joy E Nish; Holly D Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  A Visible Light-Cross-Linkable, Fibrin-Gelatin-Based Bioprinted Construct with Human Cardiomyocytes and Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Shweta Anil Kumar; Matthew Alonzo; Shane C Allen; Laila Abelseth; Vikram Thakur; Jun Akimoto; Yoshihiro Ito; Stephanie M Willerth; Laura Suggs; Munmun Chattopadhyay; Binata Joddar
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-08-01

Review 4.  Biomaterials for Bioprinting Microvasculature.

Authors:  Ryan W Barrs; Jia Jia; Sophia E Silver; Michael Yost; Ying Mei
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  Bioprinting functional tissues.

Authors:  Ashley N Leberfinger; Shantanab Dinda; Yang Wu; Srinivas V Koduru; Veli Ozbolat; Dino J Ravnic; Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 6.  3D bioprinting for cardiovascular regeneration and pharmacology.

Authors:  Haitao Cui; Shida Miao; Timothy Esworthy; Xuan Zhou; Se-Jun Lee; Chengyu Liu; Zu-Xi Yu; John P Fisher; Muhammad Mohiuddin; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 7.  Cell armor for protection against environmental stress: Advances, challenges and applications in micro- and nanoencapsulation of mammalian cells.

Authors:  Onur Hasturk; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 8.  Engineering cardiac microphysiological systems to model pathological extracellular matrix remodeling.

Authors:  Nethika R Ariyasinghe; Davi M Lyra-Leite; Megan L McCain
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 9.  From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting.

Authors:  Riccardo Levato; Tomasz Jungst; Ruben G Scheuring; Torsten Blunk; Juergen Groll; Jos Malda
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  Designing Biomaterial Platforms for Cardiac Tissue and Disease Modeling.

Authors:  Andrew House; Iren Atalla; Eun Jung Lee; Murat Guvendiren
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2020-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.