Meghan E McGrady1,2, Lisa A Prosser3, Aimee N Thompson1,2, Ahna L H Pai1,2. 1. Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. 2. Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and pilot test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess the specific factors likely to motivate a given adolescent or young adult with cancer to adhere to medications included in treatment protocols. Methods: A multimethod and iterative approach was used. Twenty adolescents and young adults with cancer participated in DCE pilot testing and refinement. Hierarchical Bayes was used to estimate attribute and attribute-level preference scores for each participant. Results: The final DCE included nine choice sets composed of four attributes. The resulting DCE was modified with feedback from 20 adolescents and young adults (M[SD] age = 18.66 [2.95]) with cancer. The DCE was understandable and relevant. The factors likely to motivate adolescents and young adults with cancer to be adherent differed across individuals. Conclusions: DCEs including the measure developed in this manuscript offer a novel approach to understanding individual-level differences critical for informing adherence-promotion efforts.
Objective: To develop and pilot test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess the specific factors likely to motivate a given adolescent or young adult with cancer to adhere to medications included in treatment protocols. Methods: A multimethod and iterative approach was used. Twenty adolescents and young adults with cancer participated in DCE pilot testing and refinement. Hierarchical Bayes was used to estimate attribute and attribute-level preference scores for each participant. Results: The final DCE included nine choice sets composed of four attributes. The resulting DCE was modified with feedback from 20 adolescents and young adults (M[SD] age = 18.66 [2.95]) with cancer. The DCE was understandable and relevant. The factors likely to motivate adolescents and young adults with cancer to be adherent differed across individuals. Conclusions: DCEs including the measure developed in this manuscript offer a novel approach to understanding individual-level differences critical for informing adherence-promotion efforts.
Authors: John F P Bridges; A Brett Hauber; Deborah Marshall; Andrew Lloyd; Lisa A Prosser; Dean A Regier; F Reed Johnson; Josephine Mauskopf Journal: Value Health Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Uwe Güth; Mary Elizabeth Myrick; Nerbil Kilic; Serenella Eppenberger-Castori; Seraina Margaretha Schmid Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: James N Porter; Amy K Roy; Brenda Benson; Christina Carlisi; Paul F Collins; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Monica Luciana; Monique Ernst Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 6.464
Authors: D H Grossoehme; E Smith; D Standiford; N Morwessel; J Kichler; D M Maahs; K Driscoll; M Seid Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Alexandra M Psihogios; Lisa A Schwartz; Kylie B Ewing; Bryn Czerniecki; Leslie S Kersun; Ahna L H Pai; Janet A Deatrick; Lamia P Barakat Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Alexandra M Psihogios; Mashfiqui Rabbi; Annisa Ahmed; Elise R McKelvey; Yimei Li; Jean-Philippe Laurenceau; Stephen P Hunger; Linda Fleisher; Ahna Lh Pai; Lisa A Schwartz; Susan A Murphy; Lamia P Barakat Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-10-22
Authors: Lori Wiener; Kimberly Canter; Kristin Long; Alexandra M Psihogios; Amanda L Thompson Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 3.955