Literature DB >> 29048287

Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 in the Water Facilities of a Tertiary Healthcare Center, India.

Rama Chaudhry, K Sreenath, Valavane Arvind, E V Vinayaraj, Sagar Tanu.   

Abstract

Proactive environmental surveillance for Legionella pneumophila in hospitals that treat immunocompromised patients is a useful strategy for preventing nosocomial Legionnaires' disease. We report the presence of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 in 15.2% of the water systems of our tertiary healthcare center, which should prompt health officials to formulate mitigation policies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  India; Legionella pneumophila; Legionnaires’ disease; bacteria; bacterial infections; legionellosis; water facilities

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29048287      PMCID: PMC5652427          DOI: 10.3201/eid2311.171071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Legionella pneumophila, the causative agent of Legionnaires’ disease (LD), is a bacterium omnipresent in aquatic environments and increasingly recognized as a major cause of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia. L. pneumophila serogroup 1 (Lp1), the dominant serogroup, accounts for ≈84% of human infections worldwide (,). Hospital-acquired LD has been reported globally, and routine use of environmental cultures is recommended as a useful strategy to prevent infections (). Although proactive environmental surveillance of Legionella and regular treatment of cooling tower installations are recommended in many countries, these practices are not routine in India, and limited studies have been conducted in this country for monitoring Legionella contamination in hospital water systems (). We conducted a study to detect L. pneumophila and to identify Lp1 in the water systems of a tertiary healthcare center in northern India that has organ transplantation and cancer treatment facilities. We collected 79 water samples (41 potable, 38 nonpotable) from the hospital and general areas of the healthcare center during an 18-month period (May 2015–October 2016). Of 79 samples, 27 were collected from patient areas (wards, intensive care units, outpatient departments, emergency units, and procedure rooms); 14 from residential areas; 15 from cooling towers; and 23 from other buildings (e.g., laboratory divisions, teaching departments, library, and recreational zones). We followed guidelines issued by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention regarding isolation of Legionella (). In brief, we concentrated 500 mL of water samples and decontaminated 1 part by using heat treatment (in water bath at 50°C for 30 min) and 1 part by acid (in equal volume of HCl-KCl acid buffer [pH 2.2]). We then inoculated 0.1-mL samples onto buffered charcoal yeast extract agar (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) supplemented with glycine, vancomycin, polymyxin B, and cycloheximide (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). We presumptively identified colonies growing only on buffered charcoal yeast extract but not on blood agar as Legionella species and confirmed the presence of L. pneumophila by amplification of a 375-bp region of the mip gene using previously published primers (). We identified Lp1 by using a real-time PCR (rPCR) assay targeting the wzm gene (). We used genomic DNA isolated from L. pneumophila strain Philadelphia (ATCC 33152) for standardization of PCR and rPCR and L. pneumophila strain Knoxville (ATCC 33153) for standardization of culture. We identified Legionella spp. in 21 (26.6%) of 79 water samples (10 potable and 11 nonpotable) by culture. We obtained a collection of 28 isolates from the 79 samples and identified all of them as L. pneumophila by PCR. Among these 28 isolates, 18 (64.3%) tested positive for Lp1 by rPCR, indicating the presence of this pathogenic serogroup in 12 (15.2%) of the 79 water samples (5 potable and 7 nonpotable). We repeatedly isolated L. pneumophila (˃4 times) from 2 high-risk sites: a drinking water unit and a cooling tower situated inside the hospital campus. Four water samples collected from patient areas tested positive for L. pneumophila, posing a risk for nosocomial infection. We isolated L. pneumophila from water bodies with temperatures ranging from 12°C to 57°C but most frequently (11 times) from those with temperatures of 25°C–50°C. We summarized the isolation of L. pneumophila with respect to type of water sample, sampling site, and temperature (Table).
Table

Legionella pneumophila isolated from 79 water samples collected at a tertiary healthcare center, by type of water, sampling site, and temperature, India, May 2015–October 2016

CharacteristicSamples positive for L. pneumophila, n = 21Samples positive for
L. pneumophila serogroup 1, n = 12
Type of water
Potable105
Nonpotable
11
7
Sampling site
Patient area43
Residential area61
Cooling tower53
Other building
6
5
Temperature, °C
<2594
25–50117
>5011
We demonstrated the presence of Lp1 in the hospital water systems, indicating that LD might be a common cause of pneumonia in this setting. Previously published reports have documented infections attributable to L. pneumophila in patients with community-acquired pneumonia; however, the prevalence of nosocomial legionellosis in India remains unknown (,,). On the basis of our findings, we initiated infection-control measures and created awareness to formulate Legionella risk management in this hospital. We ensured that physicians were cognizant of possible Legionella colonization in the hospital water supply and advised them to recommend Legionella diagnostic testing for patients with suspected nosocomial pneumonia. Underdiagnosed nosocomial legionellosis might become evident as the awareness of clinicians increases and as specialized laboratory testing for the pathogen becomes easily available. Eradication of Legionella from aquatic bodies is a herculean task. Numerous systemic disinfection measures are available, such as super heat and flush, copper-silver ionization, chlorine dioxide, and point-of-use filters, but no method is ideal for complete eradication of the contagion (). We advised the hospital’s engineers and healthcare facility managers to install point-of-use filters to the drinking water taps in areas where Legionella was isolated. Repeat sampling of 2 sites that had once tested positive for Legionella showed that they were culture-negative for the pathogen 6 six months after installation of the filters. However, to evaluate the efficacy of any disinfection method, validation and monitoring over a prolonged period is required. Our findings might be an important sentinel of an underestimated threat and could be useful for health officials in India to set standards for LD surveillance and control in hospitals. Although we did not perform sequence-based typing in this study, examination of Legionella from natural sources and advances in molecular typing might help clarify the distribution and natural history of LD in this region.
  9 in total

1.  Development of a multiplex real-time quantitative PCR assay to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in respiratory tract secretions.

Authors:  Martine Welti; Katia Jaton; Martin Altwegg; Roland Sahli; Aline Wenger; Jacques Bille
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 2.  Hospital-acquired legionellosis: solutions for a preventable infection.

Authors:  Miguel Sabria; Victor L Yu
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 3.  Controlling Legionella in hospital drinking water: an evidence-based review of disinfection methods.

Authors:  Yusen E Lin; Janet E Stout; Victor L Yu
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 4.  Current and emerging Legionella diagnostics for laboratory and outbreak investigations.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Mercante; Jonas M Winchell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Isolation of Legionella pneumophila from clinical & environmental sources in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  S Anbumani; A Gururajkumar; A Chaudhury
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Application of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay to detect Legionella pneumophila in patients of community-acquired pneumonia in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  A Angrup; R Chaudhry; S Sharma; A Valavane; K Passi; K Padmaja; S Javed; A B Dey; B Dhawan; S K Kabra
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.985

Review 7.  Legionella and Legionnaires' disease: 25 years of investigation.

Authors:  Barry S Fields; Robert F Benson; Richard E Besser
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Legionella pneumophila infection associated with renal failure causing fatality in a known case of sarcoidosis.

Authors:  R Chaudhry; A Valavane; A Mohan; A B Dey
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.985

9.  Clinical application of a multiplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Legionella species, Legionella pneumophila, and Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1.

Authors:  Alvaro J Benitez; Jonas M Winchell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Epidemiologic Survey of Legionella Urine Antigen Testing Within a Large Wisconsin-Based Health Care System.

Authors:  Caroline P Toberna; Hannah M William; Jessica J F Kram; Kayla Heslin; Dennis J Baumgardner
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2020-04-27

2.  Distribution of Virulence Genes and Sequence-Based Types Among Legionella pneumophila Isolated From the Water Systems of a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

Authors:  K Sreenath; Rama Chaudhry; E V Vinayaraj; A B Dey; S K Kabra; Bhaskar Thakur; Randeep Guleria
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.