Literature DB >> 29048285

High-Level Fosfomycin Resistance in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Yan Guo, Adam D Tomich, Christi L McElheny, Vaughn S Cooper, Amelia Tait-Kamradt, Minggui Wang, Fupin Hu, Louis B Rice, Nicolas Sluis-Cremer, Yohei Doi.   

Abstract

Of 890 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates obtained by rectal screening from patients in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 4 had MICs >1,024 μg/mL for fosfomycin. These isolates had a Cys119Asp substitution in the active site of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase. This substitution increased the fosfomycin MIC >4-fold and rendered this drug inactive in biochemical assays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterococcus faecium; MurA; UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase; antimicrobial resistance; bacteria; fosfomycin; fosfomycin resistance; vancomycin; vancomycin resistance; vancomycin-resistant enterococci

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29048285      PMCID: PMC5652432          DOI: 10.3201/eid2311.171130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Vancomycin-resistant enterococci can cause nosocomial bacteremia, infective endocarditis, and intraabdominal and urinary tract infections that have limited treatment options. Fosfomycin is an antimicrobial drug that shows a wide spectrum of activity that includes enterococci, staphylococci, and many gram-negative species (). Fosfomycin inactivates UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA) by covalent modification of a highly conserved cysteine residue in the active site of MurA (). Some bacterial species, such as Borrelia burgdorferi and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, are naturally resistant to fosfomycin because they encode an aspartic acid residue instead of cysteine in the active site of MurA. Furthermore, in Escherichia coli, substitution of this cysteine at position 115 by aspartic acid results in fosfomycin resistance (). Fosfomycin has historically shown excellent in vitro activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and therefore might be considered as a treatment option for urinary tract infection caused by this organism (). However, information regarding the activity of fosfomycin against vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the setting of increasing fosfomycin use is limited (). We tested vancomycin-resistant enterococcal isolates obtained from rectal screening cultures at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) during 2012–2016 for fosfomycin resistance.

The Study

We tested 890 vancomycin-resistant enterococcal isolates by growth on Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing 100 or 200 μg/mL fosfomycin and 25 μg/mL glucose-6-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Isolates that grew on both selective plates were subjected to determination of MIC by using the agar dilution method on Mueller-Hinton agar plates supplemented with 25 μg/mL glucose-6-phosphate (). Of 234 isolates that grew on fosfomycin-containing selective plates, MICs were 32 μg/mL for 10 (4.3%), 64 μg/mL for 92 (39.3%), 128 μg/mL for 120 (51.3%), 256 μg/mL for 7 (3.0%), 512 μg/mL for 1 (0.4%), and >1,024 μg/mL for 4 (1.7%). When we used the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoint for urinary tract infections (), we found that 12 isolates (1.3%) had MICs >256 μg/mL and were considered resistant; an additional 120 isolates were considered to have intermediate resistance. The estimated resistance rate of 1.3% is consistent with that reported in a recent surveillance study conducted in the United States (). However, the resistance rate would be much higher if we applied the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (Växjö, Sweden) breakpoint of <32 μg/mL for susceptible isolates and >32 μg/mL for resistant isolates. The 4 vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolates with MICs >1,024 μg/mL were Enterococcus faecium. We subjected these isolates and a representative fosfomycin-susceptible E. faecium isolate (kindly provided by L. Harrison) to high-throughput paired-end sequencing by using NextSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). We performed de novo assembly by using CLC Genomics Workbench version 10.0 (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). We deposited assembled genome sequences in GenBank (accession nos. SAMN07274321–5). The 4 fosfomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates belonged to sequence type (ST) 17 (n = 2), ST18 (n = 1), and ST233 (n = 1) on the basis of in silico multilocus sequence typing and all had the vanA gene. These STs belong to clonal group 17, which is a prominent hospital-adapted vancomycin-resistant E. faecium clonal lineage associated with outbreaks in healthcare environments (). None of the isolates had fosB, a transferable bacillithiol S-transferase gene associated with fosfomycin resistance (). However, murA of the 4 fosfomycin-resistant isolates had a codon change of TGTCys119→GATAsp119 at nucleotide position 355–357, which was not present in the fosfomycin-susceptible control isolate or any of the available E. faecium genome sequences and was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Technical Appendix Figure). The murA gene of the 8 remaining fosfomycin-resistant isolates with lower MICs of 256 or 512 μg/mL did not contain the nonsynonymous mutations corresponding to C119D. Therefore, the C119D substitution was specific to isolates with a fosfomycin MIC >1,024 μg/mL. We amplified wild-type and mutant (C119D) murA, with their native promoters, by PCR with primers murA-F-EcoRI (5′-GAGAGAATTCCATAAAATGAGATGCGGATG-3′) and murA-R-BamHI (5′-GAGAGGATCCTTAAGCAATCGTTTGTGCTG-3′) (bold indicates restriction endonuclease site sequences) and cloned them into the shuttle vector pTCV-lac (). We selected E. coli TOP10 transformants by using kanamycin and erythromycin. After confirmation of sequences, we transformed recombinant plasmids into E. coli SM10, subsequently transferred them into E. faecium D344S by conjugation, and performed selection by using kanamycin, fusidic acid, and rifampin. The baseline fosfomycin MIC of the host strain was 128 μg/mL. Introduction of pTCV-lac-murAWT resulted in a 4-fold increase in the MIC to 512 μg/mL, which might be caused by increased expression of WT MurA produced as a result of complementation. Nonetheless, introduction of pTCV-lac-murAC119D yielded a higher MIC of >1,024 μg/mL, which indicated a >4-fold increase in the MIC compared with the murAWT control (Technical Appendix Table). This finding provided phenotypic evidence that C119D MurA is less susceptible to inhibition by fosfomycin. We determined steady-state Michaelis-Menten parameters for recombinant purified wild-type and C119D MurA (Table; Technical Appendix). The C119D substitution in MurA increased the mean ± SD Michaelis constant (Km 803.2 ± 180.0 μmol/L) for UDP-N-acetylglucosamine compared with the wild-type enzyme (Km 382.8 ± 79.5 μmol/L; p = 0.02), but did not affect the catalytic turnover (kcat). This increase in Km resulted in an ≈2-fold decreased catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) for C119D MurA with respect to UDP-N-acetylglucosamine. In contrast, C119D had no major effect on the kinetic parameters for phosphoenolpyruvate as a substrate (Table). The mean ± SD 50% inhibitory concentration of fosfomycin for wild-type MurA was 176.8 ± 38.3 nmol/L; no inhibition of C119D MurA was observed at concentrations <100 μmol/L fosfomycin (Figure).
Table

Michaelis-Menten steady-state kinetic parameters for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium wild-type and C119D MurA*

EnzymeUNAG (p value)
PEP (p value)
Km, μmol/L Vmax, μmol/L/minkcat/minkcat/Km, μmol/L/minKm, μmol/LVmax, μmol/minkcat/minkcat/Km, μmol/L/min
WT MurA382.8 ± 79.513.9 ± 1.6138.7 ± 16.40.4229.0 ± 87.20129.5 ± 8.4294.5 ± 83.81.3
CD119D MurA803.2 ± 1,780 (0.02)11.9 ± 2.2 (NS)119.4 ± 22.2 (NS)0.2304.6 ± 35.2 (NS)28.6 ± 3.2 (NS)285.5 ± 32.1 (NS)0.9

*Values are mean ± SD for >3 independent experiments unless otherwise indicated. Statistical differences between kinetic parameters for vancomycin-resistant enterococci WT and C119D MurA were assessed by using a paired t-test. MurA, UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase; NS, not significant; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; UNAG, UDP-N-acetylglucosamine; WT, wild type.

Figure

Inhibition of recombinant purified vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium wild-type (A) and C119D (B) MurA by fosfomycin. The 50% inhibitory concentration was 176.8 ± 38.3 nmol/L for wild-type MurA and >100 μmol/L for C119D MurA. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of >3 independent experiments. MurA, UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase.

*Values are mean ± SD for >3 independent experiments unless otherwise indicated. Statistical differences between kinetic parameters for vancomycin-resistant enterococci WT and C119D MurA were assessed by using a paired t-test. MurA, UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase; NS, not significant; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; UNAG, UDP-N-acetylglucosamine; WT, wild type. Inhibition of recombinant purified vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium wild-type (A) and C119D (B) MurA by fosfomycin. The 50% inhibitory concentration was 176.8 ± 38.3 nmol/L for wild-type MurA and >100 μmol/L for C119D MurA. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of >3 independent experiments. MurA, UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase. Our finding that high-level fosfomycin resistance in vancomycin-resistant enterococci can be conferred by substitution of the active site cysteine in MurA is consistent with the mode of action of fosfomycin, which covalently and irreversibly binds to the thiol group of this residue. The MurA enzymes in M. tuberculosis and B. burgdorferi are refractory to fosfomycin inhibition and naturally possess aspartic acid at the equivalent position (,). Previous site-directed mutagenesis–based studies of E. coli MurA showed that aspartic acid and glutamic acid substitutions, although conferring fosfomycin resistance, had a major effect on catalytic functioning of the enzyme (). Specifically, the catalytic efficiency of C115D E. coli MurA was reported to be >10-fold less than the wild-type enzyme (). In our study, the C119D substitution had only minimal effect on vancomycin-resistant enterococci MurA activity. The reason for these differences in kinetic activity is unclear, and additional structure–function studies will be required to elucidate differences between these MurA proteins. Nevertheless, our kinetic data help explain why this substitution was selected in E. faecium, whereas E. coli –producing C115D MurA has not been identified clinically. The nonsynonymous mutations associated with the C119D substitution of MurA were observed only in isolates that had an MIC >1,024 μg/mL and not in any isolates with lower-level resistance to fosfomycin. Therefore, the mechanisms underlying low-level fosfomycin resistance in enterococci need to be determined.

Conclusions

In this study, fosfomycin maintained activity against most contemporary vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolates, but we identified high-level resistance caused by substitution of the active site cysteine in MurA, which made it refractory to inhibition by fosfomycin but retained its catalytic activity. Our finding that high-level resistance to fosfomycin might arise through mutations of the target enzyme MurA, accompanied by modest impairment of the catalytic activity, indicates the need for ongoing surveillance activities to ensure its activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci is maintained. In addition, this finding highlights the potential relevance of aspartic acid−substituted, catalytically active MurA enzymes as a target for inhibitor development.

Technical Appendix

Additional information on high-level fosfomycin resistance in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Fosfomycin: Resurgence of an old companion.

Authors:  Sangeeta Sastry; Yohei Doi
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 2.211

2.  Alteration of a single amino acid residue reverses fosfomycin resistance of recombinant MurA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Koen A L De Smet; Karen E Kempsell; Alex Gallagher; Ken Duncan; Douglas B Young
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  Lyme disease enolpyruvyl-UDP-GlcNAc synthase: fosfomycin-resistant MurA from Borrelia burgdorferi, a fosfomycin-sensitive mutant, and the catalytic role of the active site Asp.

Authors:  Shan Jiang; Meghann E Gilpin; Menat Attia; Yi-Lee Ting; Paul J Berti
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  A broad-host-range mobilizable shuttle vector for the construction of transcriptional fusions to beta-galactosidase in gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  C Poyart; P Trieu-Cuot
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Evidence that the fosfomycin target Cys115 in UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA) is essential for product release.

Authors:  Susanne Eschenburg; Melanie Priestman; Ernst Schönbrunn
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Characterization of a Cys115 to Asp substitution in the Escherichia coli cell wall biosynthetic enzyme UDP-GlcNAc enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA) that confers resistance to inactivation by the antibiotic fosfomycin.

Authors:  D H Kim; W J Lees; K E Kempsell; W S Lane; K Duncan; C T Walsh
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 7.  Twenty-five years of shared life with vancomycin-resistant enterococci: is it time to divorce?

Authors:  Vincent Cattoir; Roland Leclercq
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 8.  Fosfomycin for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive cocci with advanced antimicrobial drug resistance: a review of microbiological, animal and clinical studies.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Nikos Roussos; Ioannis D Gkegkes; Petros I Rafailidis; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.206

9.  The fosfomycin resistance gene fosB3 is located on a transferable, extrachromosomal circular intermediate in clinical Enterococcus faecium isolates.

Authors:  Xiaogang Xu; Chunhui Chen; Dongfang Lin; Qinglan Guo; Fupin Hu; Demei Zhu; Guanghui Li; Minggui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fosfomycin and Comparator Activity Against Select Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Enterococcus Urinary Tract Infection Isolates from the United States in 2012.

Authors:  Tiffany R Keepers; Marcela Gomez; Chris Celeri; Kevin M Krause; Donald Biek; Ian Critchley
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2017-03-11
View more
  10 in total

1.  Oral Fosfomycin Treatment for Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections in a Dynamic In Vitro Model.

Authors:  Iain J Abbott; Elke van Gorp; Aart van der Meijden; Rixt A Wijma; Joseph Meletiadis; Jason A Roberts; Johan W Mouton; Anton Y Peleg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Structural and functional characterization of fosfomycin resistance conferred by FosB from Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Vanessa Wiltsie; Skye Travis; Madeline R Shay; Zachary Simmons; Patrick Frantom; Matthew K Thompson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Evolution of Enterococcus faecium in Response to a Combination of Daptomycin and Fosfomycin Reveals Distinct and Diverse Adaptive Strategies.

Authors:  Adeline Supandy; Heer H Mehta; Truc T Tran; William R Miller; Rutan Zhang; Libin Xu; Cesar A Arias; Yousif Shamoo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 4.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Enterococci.

Authors:  Ayesha Khan; William R Miller; Dierdre Axell-House; Jose M Munita; Cesar A Arias
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 11.677

5.  Assessing the Emergence of Resistance in vitro and Invivo: Linezolid Combined with Fosfomycin Against Fosfomycin-Sensitive and Resistant Enterococcus.

Authors:  Yaowen Li; Yu Peng; Na Zhang; Huiping Liu; Jun Mao; Yisong Yan; Shuaishuai Wang; Guang Yang; Yanyan Liu; Jiabin Li; Xiaohui Huang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Time series analysis of antibacterial usage and bacterial resistance in China: observations from a tertiary hospital from 2014 to 2018.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Zeng; Zhijie Xu; Xiang Wang; Wanli Liu; Long Qian; Xi Chen; Jie Wei; Minwen Zhu; Zhicheng Gong; Yuanliang Yan
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Pharmacodynamics Of Linezolid-Plus-Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Susceptible And -Resistant Enterococci In Vitro And In Vivo Of A Galleria mellonella Larval Infection Model.

Authors:  Caifen Qi; Shuangli Xu; Maomao Wu; Shuo Zhu; Yanyan Liu; Hong Huang; Guijun Zhang; Jiabin Li; Xiaohui Huang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid Plus Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Shuaishuai Wang; Huiping Liu; Jun Mao; Yu Peng; Yisong Yan; Yaowen Li; Na Zhang; Lifang Jiang; Yanyan Liu; Jiabin Li; Xiaohui Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Tuberculosis challenges: Resistance, co-infection, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Mohsen Heidary; Maryam Shirani; Melika Moradi; Mehdi Goudarzi; Ramin Pouriran; Tayebe Rezaeian; Saeed Khoshnood
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2022-04-14

10.  High Prevalence and Overexpression of Fosfomycin-Resistant Gene fosX in Enterococcus faecium From China.

Authors:  Ling Xin; Xiaogang Xu; Qingyu Shi; Renru Han; Jue Wang; Yan Guo; Fupin Hu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 6.064

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.