| Literature DB >> 29047380 |
Wei Li1, Yuan Song1, Zhijun Zhong1, Xiangming Huang2, Chengdong Wang3, Caiwu Li3, Haidi Yang3, Haifeng Liu1, Zhihua Ren1, Jingchao Lan2, Kongju Wu2, Guangneng Peng4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most studies on Enterocytozoon bieneusi are conducted based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rRNA gene, whereas some have examined E. bieneusi population structures. Currently, the population genetics of this pathogen in giant panda remains unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the E. bieneusi population in captive giant pandas in China.Entities:
Keywords: E. bieneusi; Gene diversity; Linkage disequilibrium; Multilocus sequence typing; Population genetics; Population structure
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29047380 PMCID: PMC5648467 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2459-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Samples used in this study and their genotype distribution
| Category | No. of samples used | No. of types at each micro and mini satellite locia | No. MLGs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS1 | MS3 | MS4 | MS7 | |||
| CRBGPB | 25 | 7 (15) | 5 (14) | 4 (15) | 4 (14) | 10 (11) |
| DGPB | 16 | 5 (14) | 2 (12) | 5 (14) | 2 (14) | 7 (11) |
| WGGPB | 7 | 1 (6) | 4 (5) | 2 (6) | 1 (6) | 3 (4) |
| WHGPB | 3 | 1 (1) | 2 (2) | 2 (2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| YBGPB | 4 | 2 (3) | 3 (3) | 3 (3) | 1 (3) | 3 (3) |
| ZGs | 14 | 4 (9) | 2 (9) | 6 (10) | 1 (10) | 6 (7) |
| Total | 69 | 10 (48) | 8 (45) | 9 (50) | 5 (47) | 24 (36) |
aNumber in the parenthesis indicates the number of samples
Abbreviations: CRBGPB Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, DGPB Dujiangyan Giant Panda Base, WGGPB Wolong Gengda Giant Panda Base, WHGPB Wolong Hetaoping Giant Panda Base, YBGPB Yaan Bifengxia Giant Panda Base, ZGs zoological gardens
Hd, polymorphic sites, intragenic linkage disequilibrium and recombination events in individual genetic markers among 36 E. bieneusi specimens
| Marker | Hd | Polymorphic sites | LD (|D’|) | Rm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | 1 | 43 | Y = 0.9994 + 0.0000X | 1 |
| MS1 | 0.53 | 6 | Y = 1.0000 + 0.0000X | 0 |
| MS3 | 0.86 | 7 | Y = 1.0000 + 0.0000X | 0 |
| MS4 | 0.97 | 28 | Y = 0.9866 + 0.0163X | 2 |
| MS7 | 1 | 14 | Y = 1.0000 + 0.0000X | 0 |
Hd gene diversity, LD (|D’|) linkage disequilibrium per site, Rm minimum number of recombination events
Fig. 1Linkage disequilibrium (LD) in 36 isolates determined by DnaSP software after end-to-end linking of the sequences of 5 loci. Y coordinate represents the LD value, and X coordinate represents the nucleotide distance in kb
Genetic diversity in 36 E. bieneusi specimens based on the analysis of concatenated multilocus gene sequences
| Test model | Variability of multilocus gene sequences | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of MLGs | Hd | k | Pi | Theta (k) |
|
| |
| Polymorphic sites | 662 | 0.994 | 83.173 | 0.0330 | 83.173 | -6.680 | 0.010 |
| Segregating sites | 49 | 0.768 | 8.379 | 0.004 | 8.379 | 1.144 | 0.133 |
Abbreviations: Hd gene diversity, k mean number of pairwise differences, Pi nucleotide diversity (average over loci), theta (k) gene variance based on the mean number of pair-wise differences, Fs Fu’s statistic testing selective neutrality based on genotype frequency, Obs observed value, P (Fs ≤ Obs) probability of obtaining Fs values equal or lower than the observed
Results of linkage disequilibrium analysis based on allelic profile data
| Population |
| H ± SD |
| PMC | VD | L | VD > L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 36 | 0.5151 ± 0.1396 | 0.0903 | 1.10 × 10−02 | 0.9725 | 0.7652 | Y |
| Alla | 23 | 0.6107 ± 0.1358 | 0.0408 | 2.11 × 10−01 | 0.8191 | 0.7297 | Y |
| Population 1 | 14 | 0.2637 ± 0.1539 | 0.0482 | 1.97 × 10−01 | 0.5636 | 0.4925 | Y |
| Population 2 | 10 | 0.2833 ± 0.1641 | -0.0358 | – | 0.4364 | 0.4889 | N |
| Population 3 | 12 | 0.6856 ± 0.0908 | 0.0739 | 1.76 × 10−01 | 0.9326 | 0.7633 | Y |
| Population 1a | 7 | 0.5833 ± 0.1463 | -0.0331 | 7.75 × 10−01 | 0.6443 | 0.7153 | N |
| Population 2a | 6 | 0.3167 ± 0.1873 | -0.0690 | – | 0.3524 | 0.4444 | N |
| Population 3a | 12 | 0.6856 ± 0.0908 | 0.0739 | 1.76 × 10−01 | 0.9326 | 0.7633 | Y |
aConsidering each group of isolates with the same MLG as one individual
Abbreviations: n number of isolates, H mean genetic diversity, SD standard deviation, I standardized index of association, P significance for obtaining this value in 1000 simulations using the Monte Carlo method, V variance of pair-wise differences, L 95% critical value for VD, VD > L indicates linkage disequilibrium, Y, V > L N, VD ≤ L
Fig. 2Subpopulation structure of 36 E. bieneusi isolates. Different subpopulation patterns are shown depending on the setting of K values. a K = 2. b K = 3. c K = 4
Fig. 3K value calculation for population substructuring after burn-in length of 104 and 105 replicates of 20 Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation runs. a Plot of mean likelihood L (K) and variance per K value from STRUCTURE on a dataset containing 36 specimens for five loci. b-d Plots for detecting the number of K groups that best fit the data, where (d) represents the peak delta K value of 3
Fig. 4Median-joining analysis of the multilocus sequence contigs from 36 E. bieneusi isolates in this study. The size of the circles is proportional to the frequency of each of the 24 multilocus genotypes obtained based on segregating sites. The yellow, green, pink, purple, blue, grey and brown colours in circles represent the isolates from Sichuan, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Shandong, Fujian, Hunan provinces, and Shanghai city, respectively