Literature DB >> 29047034

Quantitative Volumetric K-Means Cluster Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue and Skin in Breast MRI.

Anton Niukkanen1,2, Otso Arponen3, Aki Nykänen3,4, Amro Masarwah3, Anna Sutela3, Timo Liimatainen3, Ritva Vanninen3,4,5, Mazen Sudah3.   

Abstract

Mammographic breast density (MBD) is the most commonly used method to assess the volume of fibroglandular tissue (FGT). However, MRI could provide a clinically feasible and more accurate alternative. There were three aims in this study: (1) to evaluate a clinically feasible method to quantify FGT with MRI, (2) to assess the inter-rater agreement of MRI-based volumetric measurements and (3) to compare them to measurements acquired using digital mammography and 3D tomosynthesis. This retrospective study examined 72 women (mean age 52.4 ± 12.3 years) with 105 disease-free breasts undergoing diagnostic 3.0-T breast MRI and either digital mammography or tomosynthesis. Two observers analyzed MRI images for breast and FGT volumes and FGT-% from T1-weighted images (0.7-, 2.0-, and 4.0-mm-thick slices) using K-means clustering, data from histogram, and active contour algorithms. Reference values were obtained with Quantra software. Inter-rater agreement for MRI measurements made with 2-mm-thick slices was excellent: for FGT-%, r = 0.994 (95% CI 0.990-0.997); for breast volume, r = 0.985 (95% CI 0.934-0.994); and for FGT volume, r = 0.979 (95% CI 0.958-0.989). MRI-based FGT-% correlated strongly with MBD in mammography (r = 0.819-0.904, P < 0.001) and moderately to high with MBD in tomosynthesis (r = 0.630-0.738, P < 0.001). K-means clustering-based assessments of the proportion of the fibroglandular tissue in the breast at MRI are highly reproducible. In the future, quantitative assessment of FGT-% to complement visual estimation of FGT should be performed on a more regular basis as it provides a component which can be incorporated into the individual's breast cancer risk stratification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast density; FGT; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Segmentation; Tomosynthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29047034      PMCID: PMC6113149          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0031-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  34 in total

1.  A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification.

Authors:  Stefano Ciatto; Daniela Bernardi; Massimo Calabrese; Manuela Durando; Maria Adalgisa Gentilini; Giovanna Mariscotti; Francesco Monetti; Enrica Moriconi; Barbara Pesce; Antonella Roselli; Carmen Stevanin; Margherita Tapparelli; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories.

Authors:  S Ciatto; N Houssami; A Apruzzese; E Bassetti; B Brancato; F Carozzi; S Catarzi; M P Lamberini; G Marcelli; R Pellizzoni; B Pesce; G Risso; F Russo; A Scorsolini
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.

Authors:  Saskia van Engeland; Peter R Snoeren; Henkjan Huisman; Carla Boetes; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Yi-Wei Shen; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Sheng-Chy Luo; Aida Kuzucan; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Quantitative 3D breast magnetic resonance imaging fibroglandular tissue analysis and correlation with qualitative assessments: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Eralda Mema; Xiaotao Guo; Victoria Mango; Elise Desperito; Jason Ha; Ralph Wynn; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-04

6.  Very low mammographic breast density predicts poorer outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Amro Masarwah; Päivi Auvinen; Mazen Sudah; Suvi Rautiainen; Anna Sutela; Outi Pelkonen; Sanna Oikari; Veli-Matti Kosma; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures.

Authors:  Emily F Conant; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Aimilia Gastounioti; Elizabeth S McDonald; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Thomas A Sellers; John J Heine
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Similarity of fibroglandular breast tissue content measured from magnetic resonance and mammographic images and by a mathematical algorithm.

Authors:  Fatima Nayeem; Hyunsu Ju; Donald G Brunder; Manubai Nagamani; Karl E Anderson; Tuenchit Khamapirad; Lee-Jane W Lu
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-07-15

Review 10.  Imaging Breast Density: Established and Emerging Modalities.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Gultekin Gulsen; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.243

View more
  2 in total

1.  Semiautomatic assessment of respiratory dynamics using cine MRI in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Hirotaka Sato; Naoko Kawata; Ayako Shimada; Yuma Iwao; Chen Ye; Yoshitada Masuda; Hideaki Haneishi; Koichiro Tatsumi; Takuji Suzuki
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2022-09-29

Review 2.  Application of Radiomics and Decision Support Systems for Breast MR Differential Diagnosis.

Authors:  Ioannis Tsougos; Alexandros Vamvakas; Constantin Kappas; Ioannis Fezoulidis; Katerina Vassiou
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-09-23       Impact factor: 2.238

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.