Literature DB >> 29047015

Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

Lauren De Groot1, Ilene Harris2, Glenn Regehr3,4, Ara Tekian2, Paris-Ann Ingledew5,6.   

Abstract

The Internet is increasingly a source of information for pancreatic cancer patients. This disease is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage; therefore, timely access to high-quality information is critical. Our purpose is to systematically evaluate the information available to pancreatic cancer patients on the internet. An internet search using the term "pancreatic cancer" was performed, with the meta-search engines "Dogpile", "Yippy" and "Google". The top 100 websites returned by the search engines were evaluated using a validated structured rating tool. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using kappa statistics and results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Amongst the 100 websites evaluated, etiology/risk factors and symptoms were the most accurately covered (70 and 67% of websites). Prevention, treatment and prognosis were the least accurate sections (55, 55 and 43% of websites). Prevention and prognosis were also the least likely to be covered with 63 and 51 websites covering these, respectively. Only 40% of websites identified an author. Twenty-two percent of websites were at a university reading level. The majority of online information is accurate but incomplete. Websites may lack information on prognosis. Many websites are outdated and lacked author information, and readability levels are inappropriate. This knowledge can inform the dialogue between healthcare providers and patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet; Online resources; Pancreatic cancer; Patient education; Quality

Year:  2019        PMID: 29047015     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  20 in total

1.  Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  K M Griffiths; H Christensen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

2.  Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings.

Authors:  V P Abbott
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-06

3.  Internet information on colorectal cancer: commercialization and lack of quality control.

Authors:  M S Sajid; M Iftikhar; R S Monteiro; A F W Miles; W G A Woods; M K Baig
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.

Authors:  W M Silberg; G D Lundberg; R A Musacchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.

Authors:  D Charnock; S Shepperd; G Needham; R Gann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Assessing the internet prevalence of cancer.

Authors:  J M L Williamson; D B Hocken
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Quality of Internet-based information on gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  Vikram Tangri; Nilesh Chande
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  A survey of the quality of web based information on the treatment of schizophrenia and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Stephen Kisely; Greg Ong; Ashish Takyar
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.744

9.  Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.

Authors:  Tiffany M Walsh; Teresa A Volsko
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.258

10.  Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Storino; Manuel Castillo-Angeles; Ammara A Watkins; Christina Vargas; Joseph D Mancias; Andrea Bullock; Aram Demirjian; A James Moser; Tara S Kent
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

View more
  10 in total

1.  Patient-Focused Online Resources for Melanoma: Highly Variable Content and Quality.

Authors:  Eman A Alshaikh; Abdulaziz F Almedimigh; Abdulmajeed M Alruwaili; Abdullah H Almajnoni; Ali Alhajiahmed; Thamer S Almalki; Sukayna Z Alfaraj; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Gurjit S Parmar; Samarpita Das; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 1.771

3.  Online information analysis on pancreatic cancer in Korea using structural topic model.

Authors:  Minji Seo; Nayoung Lee; Junli Park; Wonkwang Jo; Yeol Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Quality Assessment of Online Resources for the Most Common Cancers.

Authors:  Jim Zhang Hao Li; Timothy Kong; Veronika Killow; Lisa Wang; Kevin Kobes; Ara Tekian; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Analysis of the quality of meningioma education resources available on the Internet.

Authors:  Chloe Ah-Ryung Lim; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-11-30

6.  Online Search Behavior for Cancer Immunotherapy Resources and Readability Analysis: An Opportunity to Aid in Medical Decision-making.

Authors:  Jie Deng; Ricky R Savjani; Percy Lee
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-10-07

Review 7.  Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information.

Authors:  Gopi Battineni; Simone Baldoni; Nalini Chintalapudi; Getu Gamo Sagaro; Graziano Pallotta; Giulio Nittari; Francesco Amenta
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2020-08-30

8.  The Past and Present of Breast Cancer Resources: A Re-evaluation of the Quality of Online Resources After Eight Years.

Authors:  Veronika Killow; Julia Lin; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-17

9.  Hand It to Dr Google: The Quality of Online Information on Ganglion Cysts.

Authors:  Tianshu Angela Ji; Neil Wells; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-01-22

10.  Effects of two-week e-learning on eHealth literacy: a randomized controlled trial of Japanese Internet users.

Authors:  Toshiharu Mitsuhashi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.