Literature DB >> 21235698

Assessing the internet prevalence of cancer.

J M L Williamson1, D B Hocken.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The internet is one of the most frequently accessed sources of information by patients. There is a variety of cancer-related information provided by the internet, aimed at both the general public (from official sites and non-regulated sites) and health care professionals. Little is known about whether the information provided reflects the prevalence of disease.
METHODS: Searches for the 10 most common UK cancers were performed using five internet search engines. The number of relevant webpages was recorded and compared to the prevalence of each cancer according to Cancer Research UK.
RESULTS: Of the 985,687,623 webpages identified, the majority were related to breast cancer (37.2%), followed by lung (16.2%) and prostate cancer (12.5%). Colorectal cancer, Oesophageal cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma had the least number of websites (4.1%, 0.3% and 0.9%, respectively). There was over-representation of breast, kidney and stomach cancer with ratios of prevalence to number of websites of 1.7, 2.6 and 2.5 to 1, respectively. There was under-representation of colorectal cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and oesophageal cancer (ratios 0.2, 0.2 and 0.1, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This data highlights the enormity of information available on the internet. However, there is over-representation of certain cancers (and under-representation of others) which may influence how patients perceive their illness. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the nature of information available on the internet and known when and how to direct patients to reputable sites that provide high quality information.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21235698     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  2 in total

1.  Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lauren De Groot; Ilene Harris; Glenn Regehr; Ara Tekian; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Gurjit S Parmar; Samarpita Das; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 1.771

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.