Literature DB >> 29045747

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Julia Riebandt1, Thomas Haberl1, Dominik Wiedemann1, R Moayedifar1, Thomas Schloeglhofer2,3, Stéphane Mahr1, Kamen Dimitrov1, Philipp Angleitner1, Guenther Laufer1,3, Daniel Zimpfer1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Right ventricular (RV) failure complicating left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with increased mortality. Despite a lack of supporting evidence, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is increasingly being used as an alternative to traditional temporary RV support. We report our institutional experience with ECMO-facilitated RV support after left ventricular assist device implantation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the concept of temporary ECMO support for perioperative RV failure in 32 consecutive left ventricular assist device (mean age 52 ± 14 years; male 84.4%; ischaemic cardiomyopathy 40.6%; INTERMACS Level I 71.8%; INTERMACS Level II 6.3%; INTERMACS Level III 12.5%; INTERMACS Level IV-VII 9.4%; HeartWare ventricular assist device 75%; HeartMate II: 25%) from May 2009 to April 2014. The study end points were RV recovery during ECMO support, mortality and causes of death.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine (90.6%) patients were successfully weaned from ECMO support after RV recovery. Three (9.4%) patients expired during ECMO support. ECMO support improved RV function and haemodynamic parameters (central venous pressure 13 mmHg vs 10 mmHg, P < 0.01; mean pulmonary artery pressure 28 mmHg vs 21 mmHg, P < 0.01; cardiac output 5.1 l/min vs 5.9 l/min, P = 0.09) over a median period of 3 (range 1-15) days. Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality were 18.8% and 25%, respectively. One-year survival was 75%, causes of death were multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (50%), sepsis (25%), haemorrhagic stroke (12.5%) and ischaemic stroke (12.5%). Causes of death during ECMO support were ischaemic stroke, sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: Temporary ECMO-facilitated RV support is associated with good long-term outcomes and high rates of RV recovery.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29045747     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  5 in total

1.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for right ventricular support in left ventricular assist device recipients.

Authors:  Julia Riebandt; Roxana Moayedifar; Günther Laufer; Daniel Zimpfer
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

Review 2.  The Surgeon's Role in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Alexandra E Sperry; Matthew Williams; Pavan Atluri; Wilson Y Szeto; Marisa Cevasco; Christian A Bermudez; Michael A Acker; Michael Ibrahim
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Results of concomitant groin-free percutaneous temporary RVAD support using a centrifugal pump with a double-lumen jugular venous cannula in LVAD patients.

Authors:  Bastian Schmack; Mina Farag; Jamila Kremer; Leonie Grossekettler; Andreas Brcic; Philip W Raake; Michael M Kreusser; Ranny Goldwasser; Aron-Frederik Popov; Ashham Mansur; Matthias Karck; Arjang Ruhparwar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Valeria Lo Coco; Maria Elena De Piero; Giulio Massimi; Giovanni Chiarini; Giuseppe M Raffa; Mariusz Kowalewski; Jos Maessen; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Do-(Not-)Mechanical-Circulatory-Support Orders: Should We Ask All Cardiac Surgery Patients for Informed Consent for Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Circulatory Support?

Authors:  Jorik Simons; Martje Suverein; Walther van Mook; Kadir Caliskan; Osama Soliman; Marcel van de Poll; Thijs Delnoij; Jos Maessen; Barend Mees; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.