N Nabieva1, S Kellner1, T Fehm2,3, L Häberle1,4, J de Waal5, M Rezai6, B Baier5, G Baake7, H-C Kolberg8, M Guggenberger9, M Warm10,11, N Harbeck10,12, R Wuerstlein10,12, J-U Deuker13, P Dall14, B Richter15, G Wachsmann16, C Brucker17, J W Siebers18, N Fersis19, T Kuhn20, C Wolf21, H-W Vollert22, G-P Breitbach23, W Janni24, R Landthaler25, A Kohls26, D Rezek27, T Noesselt28, G Fischer29, S Henschen30, T Praetz31, V Heyl32, T Kühn33, T Krauss34, C Thomssen35, A Hohn36, H Tesch37, C Mundhenke38, A Hein1, C Rauh1, C M Bayer1, A Jacob39, K Schmidt39, E Belleville40, S Y Brucker3, S Kümmel41, M W Beckmann1, D Wallwiener3, P Hadji42, P A Fasching1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany. 2. Department of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 3. Department of Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 4. Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany. 5. Department of Gynecology, Dachau Clinic, Dachau, Germany. 6. Luisen-Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 7. Oncological Medical Practice Pinneberg, Pinneberg, Germany. 8. Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany. 9. Tuttlingen Clinic, Tuttlingen, Germany. 10. Breast Center, Department of Gynecology, Cologne University Hospital, Cologne, Germany. 11. Breast Center, Clinics of Cologne gGmbH, Holweide, Cologne, Germany. 12. Breast Center, Department of Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany. 13. Vinzenz-Hospital Hannover GmbH, Hannover, Germany. 14. Department of Gynecology, Lüneburg Clinic, Lüneburg, Germany. 15. Elbland Clinics, Meissen-Radebeul, Germany. 16. County Hospital of Böblingen, Böblingen, Germany. 17. Department of Gynecology, University Hospital, Paracelsus Private Medical University of Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany. 18. Department of Gynecology, St. Josef's Hospital, Offenburg, Germany. 19. Department of Gynecology, Bayreuth Clinic GmbH, CCC ER-EMN, Bayreuth, Germany. 20. Karl-Olga-Hospital Stuttgart, Diakonie Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. 21. Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 22. Friedrichshafen Clinic, Friedrichshafen, Germany. 23. Department of Gynecology, Neunkirchen Clinic, Neunkirchen, Germany. 24. Department of Gynecology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany. 25. Gynecological Medical Practice of the County Hospital of Krumbach, Krumbach, Germany. 26. Protestant County Hospital of Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany. 27. Marien-Hospital Wesel, Wesel, Germany. 28. Department of Gynecology of the County Hospital of Hameln, Hameln, Germany. 29. Mittweida Hospital gGmbH, Mittweida, Germany. 30. HELIOS Kliniken Schwerin GmbH, Schwerin, Germany. 31. Caritas-Hospital Bad Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany. 32. Asklepios Paulinen Clinic Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany. 33. Department of Gynecology, Esslingen Clinics a.N., Esslingen, Germany. 34. Department of Gynecology Lippe-Detmold, Lippe-Detmold, Germany. 35. Department of Gynecology, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. 36. County Hospital of Rendsburg, Rendsburg, Germany. 37. Oncology Bethanien Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. 38. Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany. 39. Novartis Pharma GmbH Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany. 40. Clin-Sol GmbH Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 41. Breast Unit, Essen Mitte Clinics, Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbH, Essen, Germany. 42. Department of Bone Oncology, Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Abstract
Background: Patients' compliance and persistence with endocrine treatment has a significant effect on the prognosis in early breast cancer (EBC). The purpose of this analysis was to identify possible reasons for non-persistence, defined as premature cessation of therapy, on the basis of patient and tumor characteristics in individuals receiving adjuvant treatment with letrozole. Patients and methods: The EvAluate-TM study is a prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study in which treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole was evaluated in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive EBC in the early therapy phase. Treatment persistence was evaluated at two pre-specified study visits after 6 and 12 months. As a measure of early therapy persistence the time from the start to the end of treatment (TTEOT) was analyzed. Cox regression analyses were carried out to identify patient characteristics and tumor characteristics predicting TTEOT. Results: Out of the total population of 3941 patients with EBC, 540 (13.7%) events involving treatment cessation unrelated to disease progression were observed. This was due to drug-related toxicity in the majority of cases (73.5%). Persistence rates were 92.2%, 86.9%, and 86.3% after 6, 12, and 15 months, respectively. The main factors influencing premature treatment discontinuation were older age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02/year], comorbidities (HR 1.06 per comorbidity), low body mass index, and lower tumor grade (HR 0.85 per grade unit). Conclusion: These results support the view that older, multimorbid patients with low tumor grade and low body mass index are at the greatest risk for treatment discontinuation and might benefit from compliance and support programs.
Background: Patients' compliance and persistence with endocrine treatment has a significant effect on the prognosis in early breast cancer (EBC). The purpose of this analysis was to identify possible reasons for non-persistence, defined as premature cessation of therapy, on the basis of patient and tumor characteristics in individuals receiving adjuvant treatment with letrozole. Patients and methods: The EvAluate-TM study is a prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study in which treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole was evaluated in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive EBC in the early therapy phase. Treatment persistence was evaluated at two pre-specified study visits after 6 and 12 months. As a measure of early therapy persistence the time from the start to the end of treatment (TTEOT) was analyzed. Cox regression analyses were carried out to identify patient characteristics and tumor characteristics predicting TTEOT. Results: Out of the total population of 3941 patients with EBC, 540 (13.7%) events involving treatment cessation unrelated to disease progression were observed. This was due to drug-related toxicity in the majority of cases (73.5%). Persistence rates were 92.2%, 86.9%, and 86.3% after 6, 12, and 15 months, respectively. The main factors influencing premature treatment discontinuation were older age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02/year], comorbidities (HR 1.06 per comorbidity), low body mass index, and lower tumor grade (HR 0.85 per grade unit). Conclusion: These results support the view that older, multimorbid patients with low tumor grade and low body mass index are at the greatest risk for treatment discontinuation and might benefit from compliance and support programs.
Authors: Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Andreas D Hartkopf; Naiba Nabieva; Florin-Andrei Taran; Friedrich Overkamp; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Peyman Hadji; Hans Tesch; Johannes Ettl; Jens B Huober; Diana Lüftner; Markus Wallwiener; Volkmar Müller; Matthias W Beckmann; Erik Belleville; Tanja N Fehm; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sara Y Brucker; Andreas Schneeweiss; Peter A Fasching Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Andreas Schneeweiss; Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Andreas D Hartkopf; Naiba Nabieva; Florin-Andrei Taran; Friedrich Overkamp; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Peyman Hadji; Hans Tesch; Achim Wöckel; Johannes Ettl; Diana Lüftner; Markus Wallwiener; Volkmar Müller; Matthias W Beckmann; Erik Belleville; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sara Y Brucker; Florian Schütz; Peter A Fasching; Tanja N Fehm Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Florian Schütz; Peter A Fasching; Manfred Welslau; Andreas D Hartkopf; Achim Wöckel; Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Johannes Ettl; Diana Lüftner; Erik Belleville; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Friedrich Overkamp; Florin-Andrei Taran; Sara Y Brucker; Markus Wallwiener; Hans Tesch; Tanja N Fehm; Andreas Schneeweiss; Volkmar Müller Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: C C Hack; L Häberle; S Y Brucker; W Janni; B Volz; C R Loehberg; A D Hartkopf; C-B Walter; G Baake; A Fridman; W Malter; R Wuerstlein; N Harbeck; O Hoffmann; S Kuemmel; B Martin; C Thomssen; H Graf; C Wolf; M P Lux; C M Bayer; C Rauh; K Almstedt; P Gass; F Heindl; T Brodkorb; L Willer; C Lindner; H-C Kolberg; P Krabisch; M Weigel; D Steinfeld-Birg; A Kohls; C Brucker; V Schulz; G Fischer; V Pelzer; B Rack; M W Beckmann; T Fehm; A Rody; N Maass; A Hein; P A Fasching; N Nabieva Journal: Breast Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: W Wulaningsih; H Garmo; J Ahlgren; L Holmberg; Y Folkvaljon; A Wigertz; M Van Hemelrijck; M Lambe Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-07-21 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; Karen Lisa Smith; Yuhua Zong; Christina L Gersch; Andrea M Pesch; Jennifer Lehman; Amanda L Blackford; N Lynn Henry; Kelley M Kidwell; James M Rae; Vered Stearns Journal: Front Genet Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 4.599