Literature DB >> 29043572

Secreted proteins produced by fungi associated with Botryosphaeria dieback trigger distinct defense responses in Vitis vinifera and Vitis rupestris cells.

E Stempien1, M-L Goddard1,2, Y Leva1, M Bénard-Gellon1, H Laloue1, S Farine1, F Kieffer-Mazet1, C Tarnus2, C Bertsch1, J Chong3.   

Abstract

Grapevine trunk diseases (Eutypa dieback, esca and Botryosphaeria dieback) are caused by a complex of xylem-inhabiting fungi, which severely reduce yields in vineyards. Botryosphaeria dieback is associated with Botryosphaeriaceae. In order to develop effective strategies against Botryosphaeria dieback, we investigated the molecular basis of grapevine interactions with a virulent species, Neofusicoccum parvum, and a weak pathogen, Diplodia seriata. We investigated defenses induced by purified secreted fungal proteins within suspension cells of Vitis (Vitis rupestris and Vitis vinifera cv. Gewurztraminer) with putative different susceptibility to Botryosphaeria dieback. Our results show that Vitis cells are able to detect secreted proteins produced by Botryosphaeriaceae, resulting in a rapid alkalinization of the extracellular medium and the production of reactive oxygen species. Concerning early defense responses, N. parvum proteins induced a more intense response compared to D. seriata. Early and late defense responses, i.e., extracellular medium alkalinization, cell death, and expression of PR defense genes were stronger in V. rupestris compared to V. vinifera, except for stilbene production. Secreted Botryosphaeriaceae proteins triggered a high accumulation of δ-viniferin in V. vinifera suspension cells. Artificial inoculation assays on detached canes with N. parvum and D. seriata showed that the development of necrosis is reduced in V. rupestris compared to V. vinifera cv. Gewurztraminer. This may be related to a more efficient induction of defense responses in V. rupestris, although not sufficient to completely inhibit fungal colonization. Overall, our work shows a specific signature of defense responses depending on the grapevine genotype and the fungal species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Botryosphaeria dieback; Defense responses; Diplodia seriata; Extracellular fungal proteins; Neofusicoccum parvum; Vitis cell culture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29043572     DOI: 10.1007/s00709-017-1175-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protoplasma        ISSN: 0033-183X            Impact factor:   3.356


  31 in total

Review 1.  Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants.

Authors:  L C van Loon; M Rep; C M J Pieterse
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.078

Review 2.  Early signaling events induced by elicitors of plant defenses.

Authors:  Angela Garcia-Brugger; Olivier Lamotte; Elodie Vandelle; Stéphane Bourque; David Lecourieux; Benoit Poinssot; David Wendehenne; Alain Pugin
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Response of Vitis vinifera cell cultures to Eutypa lata and Trichoderma atroviride culture filtrates: expression of defence-related genes and phenotypes.

Authors:  C Mutawila; C Stander; F Halleen; M A Vivier; L Mostert
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Extracellular compounds produced by fungi associated with Botryosphaeria dieback induce differential defence gene expression patterns and necrosis in Vitis vinifera cv. Chardonnay cells.

Authors:  M Ramírez-Suero; M Bénard-Gellon; J Chong; H Laloue; E Stempien; E Abou-Mansour; F Fontaine; P Larignon; F Mazet-Kieffer; S Farine; C Bertsch
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.356

5.  A faster and a stronger defense response: one of the key elements in grapevine explaining its lower level of susceptibility to Esca?

Authors:  Carole Lambert; Ian Li Kim Khiook; Sylvia Lucas; Nadège Télef-Micouleau; Jean-Michel Mérillon; Stéphanie Cluzet
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 6.  Redox regulation in plant programmed cell death.

Authors:  M C De Pinto; V Locato; L De Gara
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 7.228

7.  A transcriptomic study of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon) interaction with the vascular ascomycete fungus Eutypa lata.

Authors:  Céline Camps; Christian Kappel; Pascal Lecomte; Céline Léon; Eric Gomès; Pierre Coutos-Thévenot; Serge Delrot
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 8.  Phytotoxins produced by fungi associated with grapevine trunk diseases.

Authors:  Anna Andolfi; Laura Mugnai; Jordi Luque; Giuseppe Surico; Alessio Cimmino; Antonio Evidente
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  An optimized grapevine RNA isolation procedure and statistical determination of reference genes for real-time RT-PCR during berry development.

Authors:  Karen E Reid; Niclas Olsson; James Schlosser; Fred Peng; Steven T Lund
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 10.  DAMPs, MAMPs, and NAMPs in plant innate immunity.

Authors:  Hyong Woo Choi; Daniel F Klessig
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  6 in total

1.  Grapevine Botryosphaeria dieback fungi have specific aggressiveness factor repertory involved in wood decay and stilbene metabolization.

Authors:  Elodie Stempien; Mary-Lorène Goddard; Kim Wilhelm; Céline Tarnus; Christophe Bertsch; Julie Chong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Transcriptional response of grapevine to infection with the fungal pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Jiye Yan; Xinghong Li; Qikai Xing; K W Thilini Chethana; Wensheng Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Biotechnological Potential of LSD1, EDS1, and PAD4 in the Improvement of Crops and Industrial Plants.

Authors:  Maciej Jerzy Bernacki; Weronika Czarnocka; Magdalena Szechyńska-Hebda; Ron Mittler; Stanisław Karpiński
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-16

4.  Comparison of the Molecular Responses of Tolerant, Susceptible and Highly Susceptible Grapevine Cultivars During Interaction With the Pathogenic Fungus Eutypa lata.

Authors:  Chloé Cardot; Gaetan Mappa; Sylvain La Camera; Cécile Gaillard; Cécile Vriet; Pascal Lecomte; Gérald Ferrari; Pierre Coutos-Thévenot
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Transcriptome Analysis and Cell Morphology of Vitis rupestris Cells to Botryosphaeria Dieback Pathogen Diplodia seriata.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Shuangmei You; Hui Zou; Xin Guan
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Severe Stunting Symptoms upon Nepovirus Infection Are Reminiscent of a Chronic Hypersensitive-like Response in a Perennial Woody Fruit Crop.

Authors:  Isabelle R Martin; Emmanuelle Vigne; Amandine Velt; Jean-Michel Hily; Shahinez Garcia; Raymonde Baltenweck; Véronique Komar; Camille Rustenholz; Philippe Hugueney; Olivier Lemaire; Corinne Schmitt-Keichinger
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 5.048

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.