Literature DB >> 23617335

A faster and a stronger defense response: one of the key elements in grapevine explaining its lower level of susceptibility to Esca?

Carole Lambert, Ian Li Kim Khiook, Sylvia Lucas, Nadège Télef-Micouleau, Jean-Michel Mérillon, Stéphanie Cluzet.   

Abstract

Wood diseases like Esca are among the most damaging afflictions in grapevine. The defense mechanisms in this plant-pathogen interaction are not well understood. As some grapevine cultivars have been observed to be less susceptible to Esca than others, understanding the factors involved in this potentially stronger defense response can be of great interest. To lift part of this veil, we elicited Vitis vinifera plants of two cultivars less susceptible to Esca ('Merlot' and 'Carignan') and of one susceptible cultivar ('Cabernet Sauvignon'), and monitored their defense responses at the leaf level. Our model of elicitation consisted in grapevine cuttings absorbing a culture filtrate of one causal agent of Esca, Phaemoniella chlamydospora. This model might reflect the early events occurring in Esca-affected grapevines. The two least susceptible cultivars showed an earlier and stronger defense response than the susceptible one, particularly with regard to induction of the PAL and STS genes, and a higher accumulation of stilbene compounds and some pathogenesis-related proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23617335     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-12-0305-R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  6 in total

1.  Secreted proteins produced by fungi associated with Botryosphaeria dieback trigger distinct defense responses in Vitis vinifera and Vitis rupestris cells.

Authors:  E Stempien; M-L Goddard; Y Leva; M Bénard-Gellon; H Laloue; S Farine; F Kieffer-Mazet; C Tarnus; C Bertsch; J Chong
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  Comparison of the Molecular Responses of Tolerant, Susceptible and Highly Susceptible Grapevine Cultivars During Interaction With the Pathogenic Fungus Eutypa lata.

Authors:  Chloé Cardot; Gaetan Mappa; Sylvain La Camera; Cécile Gaillard; Cécile Vriet; Pascal Lecomte; Gérald Ferrari; Pierre Coutos-Thévenot
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Exhibition of Local but Not Systemic Induced Phenolic Defenses in Vitis vinifera L. Affected by Brown Wood Streaking, Grapevine Leaf Stripe, and Apoplexy (Esca Complex).

Authors:  Piebiep Goufo; Ana C Marques; Isabel Cortez
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-14

4.  In planta Activity of Novel Copper(II)-Based Formulations to Inhibit the Esca-Associated Fungus Phaeoacremonium minimum in Grapevine Propagation Material.

Authors:  Enrico Battiston; Stéphane Compant; Livio Antonielli; Vincenzo Mondello; Christophe Clément; Andrea Simoni; Stefano Di Marco; Laura Mugnai; Florence Fontaine
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Can vessel dimension explain tolerance toward fungal vascular wilt diseases in woody plants? Lessons from Dutch elm disease and esca disease in grapevine.

Authors:  Jérôme Pouzoulet; Alexandria L Pivovaroff; Louis S Santiago; Philippe E Rolshausen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Differing Alterations of Two Esca Associated Fungi, Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora on Transcriptomic Level, to Co-Cultured Vitis vinifera L. calli.

Authors:  Jochen Fischer; Stéphane Compant; Romain J G Pierron; Markus Gorfer; Alban Jacques; Eckhard Thines; Harald Berger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.