| Literature DB >> 29042909 |
Qing Huang1, Liyuan Han2, Yanfen Liu2, Changyi Wang3, Donghui Duan2, Nanjia Lu2, Kaiyue Wang2, Lu Zhang2, Kaibo Gu2, Shiwei Duan2, Yifeng Mai1.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the contribution of DNA methylation of the protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 1 (PTPN1) gene to the susceptibility to type 2 diabetes (T2D). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from 97 patients with T2D and 97 age- and gender-matched controls. DNA methylation of the PTPN1 gene promoter was evaluated by bisulfite pyrosequencing. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare the differences in the PTPN1 promoter and other phenotypes between the patients with T2D and the controls. The results indicated a significant correlation between PTPN1 promoter methylation and the risk of T2D. Additionally, a breakdown analysis by gender revealed that PTPN1 methylation was associated with an increased risk of T2D in females. Furthermore, low-density lipoprotein (r=-0.183, P=0.046) and total cholesterol (r=-0.310, P=0.001) were inversely associated with PTPN1 methylation in females. In conclusion, the results indicate that elevated PTPN1 promoter methylation is a risk factor for T2D in the female Chinese population.Entities:
Keywords: methylation; non-receptor type 1; promoter; protein tyrosine phosphatase; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2017 PMID: 29042909 PMCID: PMC5639402 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4924
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Pairwise correlation among eight methylated cytosine-guanine dinucleotide sites in the PTPN1 gene promoter. PTPN1, protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 1; CpG, cytosine-guanine dinucleotide site; UTR, untranslated region.
Comparison of protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 1 methylation levels (%) between cases of T2D and controls.
| Characteristics | Controls | Cases | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects, n=194[ | |||
| CpG1 | 12.00±9.03 | 15.98±9.18 | 0.001 |
| CpG2 | 6.41±3.16 | 8.68±4.48 | 0.002 |
| CpG3 | 5.57±1.88 | 6.98±3.11 | 0.001 |
| CpG4 | 15.46±5.76 | 18.87±8.09 | 0.003 |
| CpG5 | 6.23±1.75 | 7.51±3.69 | 0.007 |
| CpG6 | 4.60±0.87 | 5.21±1.24 | 0.001 |
| CpG7 | 4.84±1.39 | 5.15±1.60 | 0.036 |
| CpG8 | 4.37±0.70 | 4.89±0.76 | 0.001 |
| CpG mean | 7.43±2.37 | 9.16±3.02 | 1.34×10−4 |
| Female, n=120[ | |||
| CpG1 | 10.77±7.86 | 16.57±9.33 | 0.001 |
| CpG2 | 5.92±2.14 | 8.77±5.02 | 0.001 |
| CpG3 | 5.37±1.88 | 6.78±3.06 | 0.013 |
| CpG4 | 14.80±5.73 | 18.34±8.25 | 0.021 |
| CpG5 | 6.15±1.96 | 7.18±2.03 | 0.044 |
| CpG6 | 4.51±0.92 | 5.23±1.29 | 0.006 |
| CpG7 | 4.59±0.90 | 5.07±0.94 | 0.023 |
| CpG8 | 4.26±0.76 | 4.84±0.71 | 1.00×10−3 |
| CpG mean | 7.05±2.15 | 9.10±3.12 | 4.82×10−4 |
| Male, n=74[ | |||
| CpG1 | 14.00±10.46 | 15.02±8.96 | 0.918 |
| CpG2 | 7.20±4.25 | 8.53±3.48 | 0.570 |
| CpG3 | 5.90±1.86 | 7.29±3.21 | 0.067 |
| CpG4 | 16.51±5.74 | 19.75±7.85 | 0.072 |
| CpG5 | 6.35±1.36 | 8.06±5.40 | 0.101 |
| CpG6 | 4.74±0.78 | 5.17±1.16 | 0.128 |
| CpG7 | 5.24±1.88 | 5.28±2.32 | 0.536 |
| CpG8 | 4.54±0.58 | 4.96±0.85 | 0.436 |
| CpG mean | 8.06±2.61 | 9.26±2.89 | 0.192 |
DNA methylation in the T2D controls and cases was adjusted for smoking, drinking, TG and CRE in all subjects.
DNA methylation in T2D controls and cases was adjusted for drinking, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein and uric acid in females.
DNA methylation in T2D controls and cases was adjusted for drinking, smoking and creatinine in males. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. CpGs, cytosine-guanine dinucleotide sites; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
Figure 2.Comparison of the mean DNA methylation levels of the protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 1 gene promoter between patients with type 2 diabetes and controls.
Characteristics of the subjects in the T2D case and control groups.
| Characteristics | Controls | Cases | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects, n=194 | |||
| Age (years) | 59.79±9.39 | 59.79±9.39 | 1.000 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.19±1.65 | 23.19±1.61 | 0.985 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 5.15±0.91 | 5.21±1.25 | 0.711 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.49±0.59 | 2.26±2.89 | 0.018d |
| LDL (mmol/l) | 3.22±0.80 | 2.98±0.92 | 0.053 |
| UA (µmol/l) | 332.90±88.57 | 344.28±97.79 | 0.400 |
| CRE (µmol/l) | 69.20±17.80 | 77.19±24.28 | 6.00×10−3d |
| Female, n=120 | |||
| Age (years) | 60.07±8.64 | 60.07±8.64 | 1.000 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.86±1.66 | 22.98±1.61 | 0.701 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 5.28±1.17 | 5.41±0.87 | 0.476 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.52±0.55 | 2.42±2.20 | 0.002[ |
| LDL (mmol/l) | 3.35±0.85 | 3.01±0.96 | 0.040 |
| UA (µmol/l) | 293.87±70.51 | 325.18±90.79 | 0.037 |
| CRE (µmol/l) | 63.77±19.07 | 68.83±23.04 | 0.084[ |
| Male, n=74 | |||
| Age (years) | 59.35±10.60 | 59.35±10.60 | 1.000 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.72±1.51 | 23.55±1.63 | 0.633 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 4.74±0.82 | 5.11±1.37 | 0.162 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.45±0.66 | 1.99±3.78 | 0.969[ |
| LDL (mmol/l) | 3.01±0.68 | 2.93±0.88 | 0.666 |
| UA (µmol/l) | 396.19±78.19 | 375.24±101.96 | 0.325 |
| CRE (µmol/l) | 78.00±10.95 | 90.73±19.91 | 0.002[ |
TG and CRE were subjected to log-transformation for comparison. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. BMI, body mass index; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; UA, uric acid; CRE, creatinine; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
Figure 3.Correlation analyses between the mean protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 1 DNA methylation and clinical phenotypes. Correlation analyses between (A) the mean PTPN1 DNA methylation and TC level, and (B) the mean PTPN1 DNA methylation and LDL level. TC, total cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.