Amanda D Latimore1, Rachel S Bergstein2. 1. Baltimore City Health Department, 1001 East Fayette Street, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States; Behavioral Health System Baltimore, 100 South Charles Street, Tower II, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States. Electronic address: amanda.latimore@bhsbaltimore.org. 2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States; Behavioral Health System Baltimore, 100 South Charles Street, Tower II, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To address soaring opioid overdose fatality rates, 41U.S. states have passed Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs) extending legal immunity to overdose bystanders who call for emergency assistance. This study, conducted during the period that followed implementation of a GSL, aimed to characterize current factors determining the decision to call for emergency medical help (911) at the scene of an overdose with specific attention to exploring the role of the GSL as one such factor in decision-making. METHODS: We conducted 22 in-depth interviews with needle exchange program clients in Baltimore, MD. RESULTS: Most participants reported calling 911 or witnessing a 911 call after drug overdose, but widely remained fearful of arrest for drug or paraphernalia possession, homicide, outstanding warrants, and/or trespassing. These concerns were underpinned by a history of police maltreatment and threat, and strong distrust of police; concerns which were specifically related to perceptions of police conduct at the scene of an overdose as well as perceptions of police conduct in general. Additional considerations included: fear of losing housing, informal shelter or custody of children; encountering social stigma; and facing violent and fatal repercussions at the hands of local drug dealers. Additionally, some participants did not perceive a significant enough medical risk to call 911. Two thirds of participants were unaware of the GSL. Some believed a GSL would positively impact law enforcement behaviour and increase the likelihood of a bystander call; but due to distrust of police, others believed the GSL would have little influence on bystander decisions. CONCLUSION: Insights from overdose bystanders during the post-implementation period of a Good Samaritan Law demonstrate persistent deterrents to bystanders calling 911 after overdose. Additional measures are needed to align policy aims with lived experiences of overdose bystanders, and to achieve overdose prevention aims.
BACKGROUND: To address soaring opioid overdose fatality rates, 41U.S. states have passed Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs) extending legal immunity to overdose bystanders who call for emergency assistance. This study, conducted during the period that followed implementation of a GSL, aimed to characterize current factors determining the decision to call for emergency medical help (911) at the scene of an overdose with specific attention to exploring the role of the GSL as one such factor in decision-making. METHODS: We conducted 22 in-depth interviews with needle exchange program clients in Baltimore, MD. RESULTS: Most participants reported calling 911 or witnessing a 911 call after drug overdose, but widely remained fearful of arrest for drug or paraphernalia possession, homicide, outstanding warrants, and/or trespassing. These concerns were underpinned by a history of police maltreatment and threat, and strong distrust of police; concerns which were specifically related to perceptions of police conduct at the scene of an overdose as well as perceptions of police conduct in general. Additional considerations included: fear of losing housing, informal shelter or custody of children; encountering social stigma; and facing violent and fatal repercussions at the hands of local drug dealers. Additionally, some participants did not perceive a significant enough medical risk to call 911. Two thirds of participants were unaware of the GSL. Some believed a GSL would positively impact law enforcement behaviour and increase the likelihood of a bystander call; but due to distrust of police, others believed the GSL would have little influence on bystander decisions. CONCLUSION: Insights from overdose bystanders during the post-implementation period of a Good Samaritan Law demonstrate persistent deterrents to bystanders calling 911 after overdose. Additional measures are needed to align policy aims with lived experiences of overdose bystanders, and to achieve overdose prevention aims.
Authors: Brooke S West; Daniela A Abramovitz; Patricia Gonzalez-Zuniga; Gudelia Rangel; Dan Werb; Javier Cepeda; Leo Beletsky; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2019-11-24
Authors: Kristin E Schneider; Ju Nyeong Park; Sean T Allen; Brian W Weir; Susan G Sherman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Rachel E Gicquelais; Mary Jannausch; Amy S B Bohnert; Laura Thomas; Srijan Sen; Anne C Fernandez Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kristin E Schneider; Ju Nyeong Park; Sean T Allen; Brian W Weir; Susan G Sherman Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Monica Fadanelli; David H Cloud; Umedjon Ibragimov; April M Ballard; Nadya Prood; April M Young; Hannah L F Cooper Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2019-11-18
Authors: Magdalena Cerdá; Noa Krawczyk; Leah Hamilton; Kara E Rudolph; Samuel R Friedman; Katherine M Keyes Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 21.981