Literature DB >> 29040233

Is the Best Plate a Nail? A Review of 3230 Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur.

Adam Tucker1, Kevin J Donnelly1, Clare Rowan2, Sinead McDonald3, Andrew P Foster1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the functional outcomes, revision, and mortality rates of 3 implants used for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures; the sliding hip screw (SHS), with or without a trochanteric stabilization plate (TSP); and a cephalomedullary nail (CMN).
DESIGN: Multicentre National Prospective Cohort Study.
SETTING: Northern Ireland. PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS: Patients were identified from a prospective database. Fractures were classified according to OTA/AO A31A2.2, A2.3, and A3. All patients had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. INTERVENTION: Patients received either an SHS, an SHS in combination with a TSP, or a CMN. Implant choice was at the discretion of the operating surgeon. OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome was 12-month mortality analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Secondary outcomes included 12-month functional status using a validated score and all time revision of implants for any reason.
RESULTS: In total, 3230 patients met the inclusion criteria (2474 SHS, 158 SHS + TSP, and 598 CMN). CMN use increased over time, with concomitant reduction in SHS use. There was no significant difference in functional outcomes at 12 months (analysis of variance, P = 0.177). Although men were significantly younger, they were at a higher risk of 12-month mortality. CMNs had statistically significantly lower 12-month mortality rates (P = 0.0148). The highest revision rate (4.04%) was seen in patients treated with SHS alone (P = 0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a CMN in unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures conveys the best results in functional outcomes, 12-month mortality, and has lower revision rates compared with an SHS ± TSP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29040233     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

1.  Epidemiology, treatment and mortality of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures: data from the Swedish fracture register.

Authors:  Leif Mattisson; Alicja Bojan; Anders Enocson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Primary hemiarthroplasty after unstable trochanteric fracture in elderly patients: mortality, readmission and reoperation.

Authors:  Tzu-Chieh Lin; Pin-Wen Wang; Chun-Teng Lin; Yu-Jun Chang; Ying-Ju Lin; Wen-Miin Liang; Jeff Chien-Fu Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Implants for trochanteric fractures in Norway: the role of the trochanteric stabilizing plate-a study on 20,902 fractures from the Norwegian hip fracture register 2011-2017.

Authors:  Carl Erik Alm; Frede Frihagen; Eva Dybvik; Kjell Matre; Jan Erik Madsen; Jan-Erik Gjertsen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Are Intertrochanteric Fractures Evolving? Trends in the Elderly Population over a 10-Year Period.

Authors:  Jegathesan T; Ernest Beng Kee Kwek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  Increased mortality after intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures: a comparison of sliding hip screws with nails in 19,935 patients.

Authors:  Olof Wolf; Sebastian Mukka; Jan Ekelund; Cecilia Rogmark; Michael Möller; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  Trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of trochanteric fractures: a scoping review.

Authors:  Carl Erik Alm; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Trude Basso; Kjell Matre; Stephan Rörhl; Jan Erik Madsen; Frede Frihagen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.