Literature DB >> 29040129

Postoperative CT Is Superior for Acetabular Fracture Reduction Assessment and Reliably Predicts Hip Survivorship.

Diederik O Verbeek1, Jelle P van der List, Jordan C Villa, David S Wellman, David L Helfet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pelvic radiographs are routinely used to assess acetabular fracture reduction. We compared radiographs and computed tomography (CT) with regard to their ability to detect residual fracture displacement. We also determined the association between the quality of reduction as assessed on CT and hip survivorship and identified risk factors for conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS: Patients were included in the study who had undergone acetabular fracture fixation between 1992 and 2012, who were followed for ≥2 years (or until early THA), and for whom radiographs and a pelvic CT scan were available. Residual displacement was measured on postoperative radiographs and CT and graded according to Matta's criteria (0 to 1 mm indicating anatomic reduction; 2 to 3 mm, imperfect reduction; and >3 mm, poor reduction) by observers who were blinded to patient outcome. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were plotted and log-rank tests were used to assess statistical differences in survivorship curves between adequate (anatomic or imperfect) and inadequate reductions on CT. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for conversion to THA. Two hundred and eleven patients were included. At mean of 9.0 years (standard deviation [SD], 5.6; median, 7.9; range, 0.5 to 23.3 years) postoperatively, 161 patients (76%) had retained their native hip.
RESULTS: Compared with radiographs, CT showed worse reduction in 124 hips (59%), the same reduction in 79 (37%), and better reduction in 8 (4%). Of the 99 patients graded as having adequate reduction on CT, 10% underwent conversion to THA in comparison with 36% of those with inadequate reduction, and there was a significant difference between the survivorship curves (p < 0.001). Mean hip survivorship was shorter in patients ≥50 years of age (p < 0.001) and in those with an inadequate reduction on CT (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for conversion to THA were age (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.07 to 9.62; p < 0.001), inadequate reduction (HR = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.71 to 7.45; p = 0.001), and posterior wall involvement (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.00 to 3.26; p = 0.049). Sex, fracture type (elementary versus associated), and year of surgery did not influence hip survivorship.
CONCLUSIONS: CT is superior to radiographs for detecting residual displacement after acetabular fracture fixation. Hip survivorship is greater in patients with adequate (anatomic or imperfect) reduction on CT. Along with older age and posterior wall involvement, an inadequate reduction on CT is a risk factor for conversion to THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29040129     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  Postoperative computed tomography assessment of anteromedial cortex reduction is a predictor for reoperation after intramedullary nail fixation for pertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Norio Yamamoto; Takahiro Imaizumi; Tomoyuki Noda; Tomoo Inoue; Keisuke Kawasaki; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  The influence of bone quality on radiological outcome in 50 consecutive acetabular fractures treated with a pre-contoured anatomic suprapectineal plate.

Authors:  Maximilian J Hartel; Tareq Naji; Florian Fensky; Frank O Henes; Darius M Thiesen; Wolfgang Lehmann; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Dimitris Ntalos
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Feasibility of Imaging-Based 3-Dimensional Models to Design Patient-Specific Osteosynthesis Plates and Drilling Guides.

Authors:  Frank F A IJpma; Anne M L Meesters; Bram B J Merema; Kaj Ten Duis; Jean-Paul P M de Vries; Hester Banierink; Klaus W Wendt; Joep Kraeima; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  Surgical outcomes of transverse acetabular fractures and risk factors for poor outcomes.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Jang; Nam Hoon Moon; Seung Joon Rhee; Seok Jin Jung; Tae Young Ahn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Midterm results of digastric trochanteric flip osteotomy for high acetabular posterior wall fracture.

Authors:  Yuneng Li; Yufeng Ge; Haonan Liu; Shiwen Zhu; Xinbao Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Treatment modalities and outcomes following acetabular fractures in the elderly: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brian P McCormick; Joseph Serino; Sebastian Orman; Alex R Webb; David X Wang; Amin Mohamadi; Sharri Mortensen; Michael J Weaver; Arvind Von Keudell
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-02

7.  What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures?

Authors:  Anne M L Meesters; Kaj Ten Duis; Hester Banierink; Vincent M A Stirler; Philip C R Wouters; Joep Kraeima; Jean-Paul P M de Vries; Max J H Witjes; Frank F A IJpma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  The accuracy of gap and step-off measurements in acetabular fracture treatment.

Authors:  A M L Meesters; K Ten Duis; J Kraeima; H Banierink; V M A Stirler; P C R Wouters; J P P M de Vries; M J H Witjes; F F A IJpma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The value of 3D reconstructions in determining post-operative reduction in acetabular fractures: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elke Arts; Han Nijsink; Luc Verhamme; Jan Biert; Mike Bemelman; Lars Brouwers; Bas van Wageningen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Acetabular Fractures with Central Hip Dislocation: A Retrospective Consecutive 50 Case Series Study Based on AO/OTA 2018 Classification in Midterm Follow-Up.

Authors:  Chun-Yen Chen; Chin-Jung Hsu; Tsung-Li Lin; Hsien-Te Chen; Chun-Hao Tsai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.