Literature DB >> 33648482

Surgical outcomes of transverse acetabular fractures and risk factors for poor outcomes.

Jae Hoon Jang1, Nam Hoon Moon2, Seung Joon Rhee2, Seok Jin Jung2, Tae Young Ahn3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transverse acetabular fractures, although classified as elementary, have worse outcomes than other types of acetabular fractures. Prognostic factors for this fracture type are not clearly established. This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of transverse acetabular fractures and subtypes thereof and to investigate the prognostic factors.
METHODS: Between 2014 and 2019, 39 patients (39 hips) had transverse fractures or subtypes thereof. We reviewed the surgical outcomes and evaluated patient factors, injury factors, and surgical factors in relation to osteoarthritis (OA) and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Additionally, we analyzed the cutoff values for postoperative residual gaps and steps.
RESULTS: Twenty-three male patients and sixteen female with a mean age of 41.7 years (range, 18-78 years) were included. There were 29 satisfactory reductions (74.4%). Eleven hips (28.2%) developed OA, and five (12.8%) of them underwent THA. Dome impaction (odds ratio [OR], 41.173; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.804-939.814; p = 0.020) and residual gaps (OR, 4.251; 95% CI, 1.248-14.479; p = 0.021) were correlated with poor outcomes. Residual gaps (≥3 mm) and residual steps (≥1 mm) were significantly associated with OA.
CONCLUSIONS: Relatively poor reduction was found for transverse acetabular fractures and subtypes thereof. However, the rates of OA and conversion to THA were not high. Dome impaction and wide residual gaps were identified as risk factors for poor outcomes. The development of OA significantly increased if residual gap and step were more than 3 mm and 1 mm, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dome impaction; Prognostic factor; Residual gap; Residual step; Surgical outcome; Transverse acetabular fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33648482      PMCID: PMC7923451          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04082-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  21 in total

1.  Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury.

Authors:  J M Matta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Outcomes of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Berton R Moed; Jessica C McMichael
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Results after operative treatment of transverse acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Chang-Wug Oh; Poong-Taek Kim; Byung-Chul Park; Shin-Yoon Kim; Hee-Soo Kyung; In-Ho Jeon; Sang-Ho Cheon; Woo-Kie Min
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.601

4.  Surgical dislocation technique for the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Alessandro Masse; Alessandro Aprato; Luca Rollero; Andrea Bersano; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Part 2: outcome of acetabular fractures and associated prognostic factors-a ten-year retrospective study of one hundred and fifty six operated cases with open reduction and internal fixation.

Authors:  Mehdi Boudissa; Sébastien Ruatti; Gael Kerschbaumer; Michel Milaire; Philippe Merloz; Jérôme Tonetti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Transverse + posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum: epidemiology, operative management and long-term results.

Authors:  A Gänsslen; F Hildebrand; C Kretek
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.531

7.  Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the acetabulum. Results in 163 fractures.

Authors:  K A Mayo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Acetabular fracture fixation via a modified Stoppa limited intrapelvic approach. Description of operative technique and preliminary treatment results.

Authors:  J D Cole; B R Bolhofner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome.

Authors:  Dana C Mears; John H Velyvis; Chih-Peng Chang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular fracture: long-term follow-up and factors associated with secondary implantation of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Dunet; C Tournier; A Billaud; N Lavoinne; T Fabre; A Durandeau
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.256

View more
  4 in total

1.  Outcome of acetabulum fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation through Kocher-Langenbeck Approach: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; Narendra Singh Kushwaha; Prakash Gaurav Tiwari; Yashvardhan Sharma; R N Srivastava; Vineet Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-30

2.  Three-dimensional mapping study of pure transverse acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Junran Li; Jingxiu Zhai; Yingchao Yin; Siyu Tian; Zhongzheng Wang; Ligeng Li; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.677

3.  The Kocher-Langenbeck approach combined with robot-aided percutaneous anterior column screw fixation for transverse-oriented acetabular fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhao-Jie Liu; Ya Gu; Jian Jia
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The Pararectus approach in acetabular fractures treatment: functional and radiologcial results.

Authors:  Guoming Liu; Jinli Chen; Chengzhi Liang; Chengdong Zhang; Xuwen Li; Yanling Hu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.