Literature DB >> 29039181

Comparisons of Airborne Measurements and Inventory Estimates of Methane Emissions in the Alberta Upstream Oil and Gas Sector.

Matthew R Johnson1, David R Tyner1, Stephen Conley2, Stefan Schwietzke3, Daniel Zavala-Araiza4.   

Abstract

Airborne measurements of methane emissions from oil and gas infrastructure were completed over two regions of Alberta, Canada. These top-down measurements were directly compared with region-specific bottom-up inventories that utilized current industry-reported flaring and venting volumes (reported data) and quantitative estimates of unreported venting and fugitive sources. For the 50 × 50 km measurement region near Red Deer, characterized by natural gas and light oil production, measured methane fluxes were more than 17 times greater than that derived from directly reported data but consistent with our region-specific bottom-up inventory-based estimate. For the 60 × 60 km measurement region near Lloydminster, characterized by significant cold heavy oil production with sand (CHOPS), airborne measured methane fluxes were five times greater than directly reported emissions from venting and flaring and four times greater than our region-specific bottom up inventory-based estimate. Extended across Alberta, our results suggest that reported venting emissions in Alberta should be 2.5 ± 0.5 times higher, and total methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector (excluding mined oil sands) are likely at least 25-50% greater than current government estimates. Successful mitigation efforts in the Red Deer region will need to focus on the >90% of methane emissions currently unmeasured or unreported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29039181     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Methane emissions from abandoned coal and oil and gas developments in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

Authors:  James P Williams; David Risk; Alexander Marshall; Nick Nickerson; Alexandra Martell; Chance Creelman; Mitchell Grace; Grant Wach
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  A Wavelength Modulation Spectroscopy-Based Methane Flux Sensor for Quantification of Venting Sources at Oil and Gas Sites.

Authors:  Simon A Festa-Bianchet; Scott P Seymour; David R Tyner; Matthew R Johnson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Measured Canadian oil sands CO2 emissions are higher than estimates made using internationally recommended methods.

Authors:  John Liggio; Shao-Meng Li; Ralf M Staebler; Katherine Hayden; Andrea Darlington; Richard L Mittermeier; Jason O'Brien; Robert McLaren; Mengistu Wolde; Doug Worthy; Felix Vogel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  An updated look at petroleum well leaks, ineffective policies and the social cost of methane in Canada's largest oil-producing province.

Authors:  Daniel Schiffner; Maik Kecinski; Sandeep Mohapatra
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.743

5.  Reduction of Signal Drift in a Wavelength Modulation Spectroscopy-Based Methane Flux Sensor.

Authors:  Scott P Seymour; Simon A Festa-Bianchet; David R Tyner; Matthew R Johnson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Estimating Regional Methane Emission Factors from Energy and Agricultural Sector Sources Using a Portable Measurement System: Case Study of the Denver-Julesburg Basin.

Authors:  Stuart N Riddick; Fancy Cheptonui; Kexin Yuan; Mercy Mbua; Rachel Day; Timothy L Vaughn; Aidan Duggan; Kristine E Bennett; Daniel J Zimmerle
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories.

Authors:  Bruno G Neininger; Bryce F J Kelly; Jorg M Hacker; Xinyi Lu; Stefan Schwietzke
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.