J van Bastelaar1, L van Roozendaal2, R Granzier2, G Beets3,4, Y Vissers2. 1. Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands. j.vanbastelaar@zuyderland.nl. 2. Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Seroma formation is a common complication after mastectomy. This review aims to elucidate which surgical techniques are most effective in reducing the dead space and therefore seroma formation in patients undergoing mastectomy. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify clinical studies comparing any form of flap fixation to conventional closure technique in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary clearance. Studies were eligible for inclusion if outcome was described in terms of seroma formation and/or complications of seroma formation. Studies on animal research or breast reconstruction with tissue expanders or flap harvesting (latissimus dorsi) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of nine articles were eligible for inclusion. Five were retrospective studies and four were prospective. Retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated the higher incidence of seroma formation in patients not undergoing mechanical flap fixation. The incidence of seroma-related complications in these studies vary. Four out of the nine studies demonstrate that patients undergoing flap fixation, need significantly fewer seroma aspirations. There are very few studies on the use of tissue glues preventing seroma formation. CONCLUSION: The scientific body of evidence favoring flap fixation after mastectomy is convincing. Mechanical flap fixation seems to reduce seroma formation and seroma aspiration after mastectomy. There are, however, no well-powered randomized controlled trials evaluating all aspects of seroma formation and its sequelae. Further research should elucidate whether flap fixation using sutures or tissue glue is superior.
BACKGROUND:Seroma formation is a common complication after mastectomy. This review aims to elucidate which surgical techniques are most effective in reducing the dead space and therefore seroma formation in patients undergoing mastectomy. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify clinical studies comparing any form of flap fixation to conventional closure technique in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary clearance. Studies were eligible for inclusion if outcome was described in terms of seroma formation and/or complications of seroma formation. Studies on animal research or breast reconstruction with tissue expanders or flap harvesting (latissimus dorsi) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of nine articles were eligible for inclusion. Five were retrospective studies and four were prospective. Retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated the higher incidence of seroma formation in patients not undergoing mechanical flap fixation. The incidence of seroma-related complications in these studies vary. Four out of the nine studies demonstrate that patients undergoing flap fixation, need significantly fewer seroma aspirations. There are very few studies on the use of tissue glues preventing seroma formation. CONCLUSION: The scientific body of evidence favoring flap fixation after mastectomy is convincing. Mechanical flap fixation seems to reduce seroma formation and seroma aspiration after mastectomy. There are, however, no well-powered randomized controlled trials evaluating all aspects of seroma formation and its sequelae. Further research should elucidate whether flap fixation using sutures or tissue glue is superior.
Authors: Stefan Morarasu; Cillian Clancy; Nicolae Ghetu; Ana Maria Musina; Natalia Velenciuc; Stefan Iacob; Tudor Frunza; Cristian Ene Roata; Sorinel Lunca; Gabriel-Mihail Dimofte Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lotte J van Zeelst; Britt Ten Wolde; Ramon R J P van Eekeren; José H Volders; Johannes H W de Wilt; Luc J A Strobbe Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 2.885
Authors: Lisa de Rooij; Sander M J van Kuijk; Els R M van Haaren; Alfred Janssen; Yvonne L J Vissers; Geerard L Beets; James van Bastelaar Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Gaik Si Quah; James R French; Annelise Cocco; Jeremy Hsu; Farid Meybodi; Elisabeth Elder Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2019-12-31