Literature DB >> 2903807

Newer H2-receptor antagonists. Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug interaction potential.

D R Krishna1, U Klotz.   

Abstract

Since H2-receptor antagonists are widely and successfully used in the treatment of peptic ulcer, several alternatives to the standard agents cimetidine and ranitidine have been developed. Promising 'new' candidates might be famotidine and nizatidine. For proper selection of the appropriate drug, its pharmacokinetic properties and interaction potential should be known. All 'old' and 'new' H2-receptor blockers are eliminated relatively rapidly (t 1/2 ranges from 1.5 to 4 hours), mainly by the renal route (glomerular filtration and tubular secretion). They exhibit a linear disposition and their distribution is similar. Absorption is most complete for nizatidine, whereas famotidine demonstrates the lowest effective plasma concentrations. Since etintidine shares the same imidazole ring structure as cimetidine, it can also impair oxidative drug metabolism in the liver. In this respect, the non-interacting famotidine and nizatidine (like ranitidine) offer a definite advantage. Based on their very similar pharmacokinetic and interaction profiles, these 2 H2-receptor antagonists might be regarded as alternatives to the older drugs in this group, and at least some economic benefits might result from the competition they will provide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2903807     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198815040-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  40 in total

Review 1.  Prostaglandins, H2-receptor antagonists and peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  P Bright-Asare; T Habte; B Yirgou; J Benjamin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  CSF concentrations of famotidine.

Authors:  I Kagevi; E Thorhallsson; L Wählby
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Absorption studies of the H2-blocker nizatidine.

Authors:  M P Knadler; R F Bergstrom; J T Callaghan; B D Obermeyer; A Rubin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Lack of effect of nizatidine on hepatic drug metabolism in man.

Authors:  J W Secor; K V Speeg; C G Meredith; R F Johnson; P Snowdy; S Schenker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Comparative effects of famotidine and cimetidine on antipyrine kinetics in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  C Staiger; B Korodnay; J X Devries; E Weber; P Müller; B Simon; H G Dammann
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Etintidine-propranolol interaction study in humans.

Authors:  S M Huang; H S Weintraub; T B Marriott; B Marinan; R Abels
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral nizatidine.

Authors:  R Vargas; J Ryan; F G McMahon; G Regel; W W Offen; C Matsumoto
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  Comparative effect of famotidine and cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in normal volunteers.

Authors:  J H Lin; A N Chremos; R Chiou; K C Yeh; R Williams
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Nizatidine, an H2-blocker. Its metabolism and disposition in man.

Authors:  M P Knadler; R F Bergstrom; J T Callaghan; A Rubin
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.922

10.  Effect of five structurally diverse H2-receptor antagonists on drug metabolism.

Authors:  M Pasanen; P Arvela; O Pelkonen; E Sotaniemi; U Klotz
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1986-12-15       Impact factor: 5.858

View more
  8 in total

1.  Biliary excretion of H2-receptor antagonists.

Authors:  U Klotz; S Walker
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (Part II).

Authors:  K Lauritsen; L S Laursen; J Rask-Madsen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Famotidine. Pharmacokinetic properties and suppression of acid secretion in paediatric patients following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  G Kraus; D R Krishna; D Chmelarsch; M Schmid; U Klotz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Safety of acid-suppressing drugs.

Authors:  R A Smallwood; R G Berlin; N Castagnoli; H P Festen; C J Hawkey; S K Lam; M J Langman; P Lundborg; A Parkinson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with anti-ulcer drugs.

Authors:  R D Negro
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine in paediatric patients.

Authors:  L P James; G L Kearns
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine in patients with reflux oesophagitis.

Authors:  U Gladziwa; S Wagner; K V Dakshinamurty; E el Desoky; B Dreuw; U Klotz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Potential implications of DMET ontogeny on the disposition of commonly prescribed drugs in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Siavosh Naji-Talakar; Sheena Sharma; Leslie A Martin; Derek Barnhart; Bhagwat Prasad
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.