| Literature DB >> 29034189 |
Y S Jaiswal1, P A Tatke1, S Y Gabhe1, A B Vaidya2.
Abstract
Anacardium occidentale L. (Anacardiaceae) is used in South Cameroon as well as in other tropical countries by traditional practitioners as a folk remedy for treatment of diabetes mellitus. We demonstrated the antidiabetic potential of the plant extracts in n-streptozotocin diabetic rats. The aim of the current study was to investigate the antidiabetic effects of ethanol extract of leaves of A. occidentale on neonatal streptozotocin diabetic rats. Two day old neonates were injected with 100 mg/kg of streptozotocin. At the end of the experimental period of 30 days, reduction in the fasting blood glucose levels, serum insulin, glycated hemoglobin levels, serum lipid parameters, and renal function biomarkers were estimated in the control and treated rats. Histopathological examination of liver, kidney and pancreas were also carried out. On administration of 100 mg/kg of plant extract, blood glucose levels of the rats showed 8.01% and 19.25% decrease in the fasting blood glucose levels on day 15 and day 30, respectively. The administration of extract showed that the effects of extract treatment are comparable to treatment with the standard drug Pioglitazone. These results demonstrate significant antidiabetic potential of the ethanol extract of leaves of A. occidentale, justifying the use of plant in the indigenous system of medicine. Further studies for investigating the specific compound(s) responsible for such beneficial role in diabetes would open new outlook in the therapy of type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Anacardium occidentale; Leaves; Neonatal-induced diabetic rats; Streptozotocin; Type 2 diabetes
Year: 2016 PMID: 29034189 PMCID: PMC5634720 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.11.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Effect of plant extract on body weight in rats.
| Treatment | Body weight (g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On day 1 | Day 10 | Day 20 | Day 30 | |
| Normal control | 229.17 ± 7.4 | 238.17 ± 6.9 | 245.83 ± 6.1 | 249.50 ± 5.1 |
| Diabetic control | 206.83 ± 11.7 | 218.67 ± 12.2 | 210.83 ± 12.1 | 209.33 ± 13.3 |
| Pioglitazone (2 mg/kg) | 222.67 ± 8.8 | 230.33 ± 10.1 | 236.17 ± 8.82 | 239.67 ± 8.42 |
| Ethanol extract of leaves (100 mg/kg) | 213.67 ± 13.5 | 215.33 ± 18.0 | 223.67 ± 14.0 | 229.83 ± 15.0 |
Each of the values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 6.
Effect of plant extract on fasting blood glucose levels in rats.
| Treatment | Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) ± SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| On day 0 | Day 15 | Day 30 | |
| Normal control | 78.67 ± 0.84 | 76.5 ± 1.38 | 75.83 ± 1.82 |
| Diabetic control | 150.33 ± 6.92 | 149.33 ± 5.86 | 154.50 ± 5.40 |
| Pioglitazone (2 mg/kg) | 144.83 ± 7.24 | 129.50 ± 5.47 | 113.33 ± 3.30 |
| Ethanol extract of cashew leaves (100 mg/kg) | 147.67 ± 6.09 | 135.83 ± 4.40 | 123.83 ± 2.87 |
Each of the values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 6.
Significantly different from control, p < 0.05.
Effect of plant extract on serum insulin and glycated hemoglobin in rats.
| Treatment | Serum insulin on day 30 (Uiu/ml) | Glycated hemoglobin on day 30 (%) | FIRI on day 30 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 16.99 ± 1.5 | 3.92 ± 0.08 | 51.71 ± 5.1 |
| Diabetic control | 16.52 ± 1.9 | 5.6 ± 0.27 | 103.37 ± 14.8 |
| Pioglitazone (2 mg/kg) | 13.43 ± 1.4 | 4.25 ± 0.18 | 60.44 ± 5.86 |
| Ethanol extract of cashew leaves (100 mg/kg) | 11.69 ± 0.93 | 4.92 ± 0.17 | 57.90 ± 4.69 |
Each of the values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 6.
FIRI denotes fasting insulin resistance index.
Significantly different from control, p < 0.05.
Effect of plant extract on serum triglyceride levels in rats.
| Treatment | Serum triglyceride (mg/dl) ± SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| On day 0 | Day 15 | Day 30 | |
| Normal control | 58.55 ± 3.65 | 61.21 ± 3.99 | 60.06 ± 4.13 |
| Diabetic control | 97.33 ± 8.12 | 98.71 ± 7.97 | 104.89 ± 7.55 |
| Pioglitazone (2 mg/kg) | 94.80 ± 3.05 | 84.59 ± 2.67 | 75.93 ± 2.52 |
| Ethanol extract of cashew leaves (100 mg/kg) | 96.63 ± 4.22 | 88.84 ± 4.16 | 81.69 ± 4.47 |
Each of the values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 6.
Significantly different from control, p < 0.05.
Effect of plant extract on lipid parameters in rats.
| Treatment | Serum Parameter on day 30 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | LDL-C (mg/dl) | VLDL-C (mg/dl) | |
| Normal control | 37.35 ± 1.81 | 28.73 ± 3.95 | 12.01 ± 0.82 |
| Diabetic control | 34.01 ± 2.01 | 49.38 ± 4.94 | 20.98 ± 1.51 |
| Pioglitazone (2 mg/kg) | 39.74 ± 2.28 | 29.31 ± 3.80 | 15.15 ± 0.78 |
| Ethanol extract of cashew leaves (100 mg/kg) | 36.19 ± 1.80 | 35.39 ± 3.03 | 16.34 ± 0.89 |
Each of the values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 6.
TG – Triglyceride; TC – Total cholesterol; HDL-c – High density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C – Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-C – Very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, VLDL-c calculated using friedewald formula.
VLDL = TG/5; LDL = TC − (HDL + TG/5).
Significantly different from control, p < 0.05.
Effect of plant extract on serum total cholesterol levels in rats.
| Treatment | Serum total cholesterol (mg/dl) ± SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| On day 0 | Day 15 | Day 30 | |
| Normal control | 78.89 ± 3.22 | 77.82 ± 2.78 | 78.09 ± 3.87 |
| Diabetic control | 99.49 ± 2.82 | 102.42 ± 3.38 | 104.37 ± 4.95 |
| Pioglitazone (2 mg/kg) | 95.11 ± 2.72 | 88.90 ± 2.64 | 84.21 ± 3.18 |
| Ethanol extract of cashew leaves (100 mg/kg) | 96.32 ± 2.59 | 91.93 ± 2.51 | 87.91 ± 3.21 |
Each of the values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 6.
Significantly different from control, p < 0.05.
Effect of plant extract on renal function biomarkers in rats.
| Treatment | Serum biomarkers of Liver and Kidney on day 30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGOT | SGPT | Urea | Creatinine | |
| Normal control | 273.14 ± 5.47 | 71.88 ± 4.91 | 61.18 ± 1.64 | 0.67 ± 0.02 |
| Diabetic control | 286.71 ± 28.46 | 85.34 ± 10.85 | 77.83 ± 2.12 | 0.81 ± 0.06 |
| Pioglitazone (2 mg/kg) | 291.83 ± 20.61 | 91.16 ± 7.28 | 67.60 ± 3.88 | 0.75 ± 0.02 |
| Ethanol extract of cashew leaves (100 mg/kg) | 222.19 ± 23.23 | 66.29 ± 4.27 | 66.93 ± 3.96 | 0.66 ± 0.01 |
Each of the values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 6.
Significantly different from control, p < 0.05.
Fig. 1Photomicrographs of liver. a) Normal rat, b) diabetic rat, c) diabetic rats treated with standard drug, d) diabetic rat treated with ethanol extract of leaves.
Fig. 2Photomicrographs of kidney. a) Normal rat, b) diabetic rat, c) diabetic rats treated with standard drug, d) diabetic rat treated with ethanol extract of leaves.
Fig. 3Photomicrographs of pancreas. a) Normal rat, b) diabetic rat, c) diabetic rats treated with standard drug, d) diabetic rat treated with ethanol extract of leaves.