Literature DB >> 29032574

Five-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing bone-level implants with either submerged or transmucosal healing.

Juan Flores-Guillen1, Carmen Álvarez-Novoa1, Germán Barbieri1, Conchita Martín1, Mariano Sanz1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the long-term hard and soft tissue peri-implant tissue stability of bone-level implants using a different implant placement protocol (submerged versus transmucosal).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was partly a subset analysis of a multicentre study where in 40 patients, a single bone-level implant with platform switching and a conical implant-abutment interface was placed either submerged or transmucosal in non-molar sites. Changes in the peri-implant tissues between implant placement and 5 years were assessed clinically and radiologically. Patient-related outcomes were also recorded.
RESULTS: Thirty patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Implant survival rate was 100%. The mean radiographic changes in crestal bone levels between baseline and 5 years were 0.59 (0.92) mm and 0.78 (1.03) mm for the submerged and the transmucosal groups, respectively. No statistical significant differences were found between the groups for any of the investigated variables. Peri-implantitis, defined as changes in the level of crestal bone of ≥2 mm together with bleeding on probing, was only diagnosed in one patient. Patients in both groups were highly satisfied with the treatment received.
CONCLUSIONS: Bone-level implants with submerged or transmucosal healing protocols demonstrated similar outcomes after 5 years. Both protocols yielded optimal clinical and radiographic results when bone-level implants were placed in non-molar positions for single tooth replacement.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crestal bone levels; dental implants; randomized clinical trial; surgical protocol; wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29032574     DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  6 in total

1.  Differences in the progression of experimental peri-implantitis depending on the implant to abutment connection.

Authors:  Javier Sanz-Esporrin; Cristina Carral; Juan Blanco; José V Sanz-Casado; Fernando Muñoz; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Two-Dimensional Analysis of Digital Images through Vector Graphic Editors in Dentistry: New Calibration and Analysis Protocol Based on a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Samuel Rodríguez-López; Matías Ferrán Escobedo Martínez; Luis Junquera; María García-Pola
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The Effect of Tapered Abutments on Marginal Bone Level: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Simone Marconcini; Enrica Giammarinaro; Ugo Covani; Eitan Mijiritsky; Xavier Vela; Xavier Rodríguez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Clinical and radiographics results at 3 years of RCT with split-mouth design of submerged vs. nonsubmerged single laser-microgrooved implants in posterior areas.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Dario Di Nardo; Gianni Di Giorgio; Gabriele Miccoli; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 5.  Bone loss-related factors in tissue and bone level dental implants: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Hamed Mortazavi; Amin Khodadoustan; Aida Kheiri; Lida Kheiri
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-30

6.  Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Karl-Ludwig Ackermann; Thomas Barth; Claudio Cacaci; Steffen Kistler; Markus Schlee; Michael Stiller
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-04-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.