Literature DB >> 33179178

Differences in the progression of experimental peri-implantitis depending on the implant to abutment connection.

Javier Sanz-Esporrin1, Cristina Carral2, Juan Blanco2, José V Sanz-Casado3, Fernando Muñoz4, Mariano Sanz3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the rate of bone loss progression during experimentally induced peri-implantitis using two different implant-abutment connections in implants with identical surface topography.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-eight Regular Neck tissue-level SLA implants with a matching implant to abutment connection (TL) and 36 bone-level SLA implants with a switching platform implant to abutment connection (BL) were subjected to experimental peri-implantitis in two independent in vivo pre-clinical investigations. Experimental peri-implantitis was induced by means of silk ligatures during 3 months (induction phase), and followed for one extra month without ligatures (progression phase). Radiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated longitudinally along both studies and subsequently compared between experiments.
RESULTS: During the induction phase, radiographic bone loss was significantly higher in implants with matched abutments compared with those with platform switching connections (2.65 ± 0.66 mm vs 0.84 ± 0.16 mm, respectively, p = 0.001). During the progression phase, both types of implant-abutment connection exhibited similar rates of radiographic bone loss. Similar outcomes were observed clinically.
CONCLUSIONS: A platform switching connection resulted in a more benign development of peri-implantitis during the experimental induction phase of the disease. These differences, however, disappeared once the ligatures were removed (progression phase). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Influence of the implant-abutment connection in peri-implantitis progression may be relevant when considering implant selection in the moment of placement. In this sense, platform switching abutment demonstrated less peri-implantitis development when compared to implant matching connection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abutments; Animal model; Bone loss; Dental implants; Experimental peri-implantitis; Implant to abutment connection; Peri-implantitis; Platform switching; Radiographic analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33179178     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03680-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  24 in total

1.  Implant surface characteristics influence the outcome of treatment of peri-implantitis: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Albouy; Ingemar Abrahamsson; Leif G Persson; Tord Berglundh
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  Epidemiology and risk factors of peri-implantitis: A systematic review.

Authors:  H Dreyer; J Grischke; C Tiede; J Eberhard; A Schweitzer; S E Toikkanen; S Glöckner; G Krause; M Stiesch
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.419

3.  Spontaneous progression of peri-implantitis at different types of implants. An experimental study in dogs. I: clinical and radiographic observations.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Albouy; Ingemar Abrahamsson; Leif G Persson; Tord Berglundh
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Biological effect of the abutment material on the stability of peri-implant marginal bone levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez; Ignacio Sanz-Martín; Ana Carrillo de Albornoz; Elena Figuero; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Experimental periodontitis and peri-implantitis in dogs.

Authors:  Olivier Carcuac; Ingemar Abrahamsson; Jean-Pierre Albouy; Elena Linder; Lena Larsson; Tord Berglundh
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions.

Authors:  Tord Berglundh; Gary Armitage; Mauricio G Araujo; Gustavo Avila-Ortiz; Juan Blanco; Paulo M Camargo; Stephen Chen; David Cochran; Jan Derks; Elena Figuero; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Lisa J A Heitz-Mayfield; Guy Huynh-Ba; Vincent Iacono; Ki-Tae Koo; France Lambert; Laurie McCauley; Marc Quirynen; Stefan Renvert; Giovanni E Salvi; Frank Schwarz; Dennis Tarnow; Cristiano Tomasi; Hom-Lay Wang; Nicola Zitzmann
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 7.  Are peri-implantitis lesions different from periodontitis lesions?

Authors:  Tord Berglundh; Nicola U Zitzmann; Mauro Donati
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  Influence of implant neck and abutment characteristics on peri-implant tissue health and stability. Oral reconstruction foundation consensus report.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Ana Messias; Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez; Ana Carrillo de Albornoz; Pedro Nicolau; Tom Taylor; Florian Beuer; Alex Schär; Robert Sader; Fernando Guerra; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 9.  Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology.

Authors:  Jan Derks; Cristiano Tomasi
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.728

10.  Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible.

Authors:  David L Cochran; Dieter D Bosshardt; Leticia Grize; Frank L Higginbottom; Archie A Jones; Ronald E Jung; Marco Wieland; Michel Dard
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.993

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.