Literature DB >> 29031882

Long-term outcomes after noncurative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: the optimal time for additional endoscopic treatment.

Mi Young Jeon1, Jun Chul Park1, Kyu Yeon Hahn1, Sung Kwan Shin1, Sang Kil Lee1, Yong Chan Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes with noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) and surveillance strategies such as the optimal time for additional endoscopic treatment in patients with noncurative ESD.
METHODS: Of 2527 patients who underwent gastric ESD for EGC, 512 (20.3%) patients with noncurative resection were reviewed. Noncurative resection is defined as positive resected margins on histology, lymphovascular infiltration, or beyond the expanded criteria for ESD.
RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation follow-up duration was 79.0 ± 55.7 months. A total of 264 patients (51.6%) and 50 patients (9.8%) underwent surgery and endoscopic treatment after noncurative resection, respectively, whereas 198 patients (38.7%) were observed. Cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly different among the surgery, other endoscopic treatment, and observation groups (96.7%, 86.8%, and 86.2%, respectively; P =.030; and 92.5%, 73.6%, and 63.0%, respectively; P < .001). When patients who underwent surgery were excluded, the disease-free survival rate of recurrence was not significantly different between the endoscopic treatment and observation groups (73.6% vs 63.0%; P = .548). To exclude the potential for the presence of lymph node metastasis, we further analyzed disease-free survival of local recurrence by comparing the patients with only a positive lateral resection margin. The disease-free survival rate was higher in the endoscopic treatment group than in the observation group (89.2% vs 69.1%; P = .023). Moreover, additional endoscopic treatment within 3 months showed significant associations with lower risk of local recurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.017; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.260; P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with noncurative ESD, additional surgery showed a better long-term outcome; moreover, when a positive lateral resection margin was the only noncurative factor, additional endoscopic treatment within 3 months could be considered to improve disease-free survival.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29031882     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of synchronous dual wavelength diode laser versus conventional endo-knives for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: an animal study.

Authors:  Jian Tang; Shufang Ye; Xueliang Ji; Jun Li; Feng Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Long-term outcomes of superficial neoplasia at the esophagogastric junction treated via endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection: a cohort study of a single center from China.

Authors:  Shengzhen Liu; Ningli Chai; Zhongsheng Lu; Huikai Li; Ying Xiong; Yaqi Zhai; Enqiang Linghu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prognosis of patients with early gastric carcinoma treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection and risk factors for additional postoperative surgery.

Authors:  Shuang Jiang; Dahe Ge; Kaijun Shou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  Long-term Outcomes of Additional Endoscopic Treatments for Patients with Positive Lateral Margins after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Tae-Se Kim; Byung-Hoon Min; Yang Won Min; Hyuk Lee; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jun Haeng Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.321

5.  Risk Factors and Timing of Additional Surgery after Noncurative ESD for Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Kaipeng Duan; Dongbao Li; Dongtao Shi; Jie Pei; Jiayu Ren; Weikang Li; Anqi Dong; Tao Chen; Jin Zhou
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-06-21

6.  Risk Factors Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis for Early Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Non-curative Endoscopic Resection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bochao Zhao; Jingting Zhang; Jiale Zhang; Rui Luo; Zhenning Wang; Huimian Xu; Baojun Huang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Predictive Factors and Long-Term Outcomes of Early Gastric Carcinomas in Patients with Non-Curative Resection by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Yun Wang; Yini Dang; Qin Huang; Jianhua Wang; Weifeng Zhang; Yifeng Zhang; Guoxin Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  TMEM119 silencing inhibits cell viability and causes the apoptosis of gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells.

Authors:  Peifen Zheng; Weifeng Wang; Muxi Ji; Qin Zhu; Yuliang Feng; Feng Zhou; Qiaona He
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  Additional gastrectomy in early-stage gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic resection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Run-Cong Nie; Shu-Qiang Yuan; Yuan-Fang Li; Shi Chen; Yong-Ming Chen; Xiao-Jiang Chen; Guo-Ming Chen; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Ying-Bo Chen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2019-03-08

10.  Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Chan Hyuk Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Jong Wook Kim; Jie-Hyun Kim; Ji Hyun Kim; Yang Won Min; Si Hyung Lee; Jung Ho Bae; Hyunsoo Chung; Kee Don Choi; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Min-Seob Kwak; Bun Kim; Hyun Jung Lee; Hye Seung Lee; Miyoung Choi; Dong-Ah Park; Jong Yeul Lee; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chan Guk Park; Joo Young Cho; Soo Teik Lee; Hoon Jai Chun
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2020-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.